Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-css3-flexbox-20120918/
Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope,
Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted.
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. # Summary: Handling of zero-length boxes at end of line From: Kang-Hao Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0094.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0158.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0384.html
Issue 2. # Summary: Handling of negative-size flex lines From: Kang-Hao Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0094.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0158.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0384.html
Issue 3. #
Summary: Need way to fill flex-item boxes / Make 'stretch' propagate definiteness
From: Rudolph Gottesheim
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0204.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0207.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0216.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0217.html
Notes: Grid (and IE?) reflow after stretching in order to resolve
percentages inside the item (but treat them as auto for finding
the flex item's size).
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0464.html
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0384.html (definite containers)
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0474.html (indefinite containers)
Issue 4. # Summary: Constant spacing around items From: Giuseppe Bilotta Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0249.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0046.html Closed: Deferred (most cases possible; maybe add more spacing controls in next level) Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0384.html
Issue 5. #
Summary: If percentage height cannot be resolved, is the flex items stretched?
From: Ojan Vafai
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0220.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0505.html
Notes: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15392
http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/REC-CSS2-20110607-errata.html#s.10.5a
Closed: Accepted
Issue 6. # Summary: Clarifications to abspos static position in flex containers From: Kang-Hao Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0462.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0478.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 7. # Summary: Conflict in applicability of 'float' to flex items From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0675.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0698.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0691.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0701.html Resolved: Editorial
Issue 8. # Summary: Interaction of 'stretch' and items with aspect ratio From: Rossen Atanassov Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0781.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0040.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0384.html
Issue 9. # Summary: Transfer min/max constraints across dimensions via aspect ratio? From: Kang-Hao Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0010.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0041.html Closed: Rejected Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0384.html
Issue 10. # Summary: Do flex items with negative margins increase available space? From: Tony Chang Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0460.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0462.html Closed: Rejected Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0384.html
Issue 11. # Summary: Stretch should clamp cross size to min/max before calculating flex base size From: Kang-Hao Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0061.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0157.html Closed: Accepted Resolve: Bugfix
Issue 12. # Summary: Orthogonal Flex Layouts Sub-optimally Defined From: Rossen Atanassov Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0251.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0260.html Closed: Accepted Verified:
Issue 13. # Summary: Should ::first-line/::first-letter apply to a flex container? From: Tab Atkins Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0264.html Response: Closed: Accepted Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0384.html
Issue 14. # Summary: Clarify interaction of min-width and width From: Ojan Vafai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0046.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0050.html Closed: Invalid
Issue 15. # Summary: Should 'overflow' apply to flex containers? From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0465.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0001.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0384.html
Issue 16. # Summary: What should percentage margins on a flex item be relative to? From: fantasai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0143.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0688.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0688.html
Issue 17. # Summary: Revert min-size of flex items to 0. From: Tab Atkins Jr. Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0364.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0257.html Closed: Accepted See also: Issue 19
Issue 18. #
Summary: Paint flex items and table cells atomically
From: fantasai
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0707.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0133.html
Closed: Accepted
Note: Recommends corresponding CSS2.1 change for Table layout, see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0145.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0027.html
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0133.html
Issue 19. # Summary: Re-revert min-size of flex items back to 'auto', with overflow consideration From: Elliot Sprehn Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0538.html Analysis: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0456.html See also: Issue 17 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0463.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 20. # Summary: Min/max constraint sizing of flexible flex-basis: 0. From: Tab Aktins Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0342.html Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0511.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0463.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 21. # Summary: Clarify interaction of table fixup and flex itemizing From: Christian Biesinger Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0508.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0462.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 22. # Summary: Re-evaluate static position of flex items and grid items From: Daniel Holbert and fantasai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0514.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0459.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0217.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0255.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0146.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0468.html
Issue 23. # Summary: Intrinsic cross-sizing vs. main-size From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0360.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0171.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editors' discretion, needs LC review for correctness
Issue 24. # Summary: Missing clamp to min/max size From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0698.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0701.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 25. # Summary: change initial value of align-items to flex-start From: Bruno Racineaux Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Nov/0117.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Nov/0142.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Nov/0152.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Nov/0166.html Closed: Rejected Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0474.html
Issue 26. # Summary: Clarify "white space" From: Simon Sapin Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Nov/0369.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0555.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0556.html Resolved: Clarification
Issue 27. # Summary: Remove example's dependency on CSS3 Box Alignment From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0032.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0145.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 28. # Summary: Handling <br> as text From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0317.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0425.html Closed: OutOfScope Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0055.html
Issue 29. # Summary: Distinguish element vs. box From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0459.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0423.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 30. # Summary: Discontinuity of flex values between 0 and 1 From: Tab Atkins Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0246.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0424.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0055.html
Issue 31. # Summary: Confusion wrt computed 'display' and box generation From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0469.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0173.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 32. # Summary: Should 'float' compute to 'none' on flex items From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0469.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0173.html Closed: Rejected Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0474.html
Issue 33. # Summary: Does 'order' affect counters From: Peter Moulder Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0469.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0176.html Closed: Invalid Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0474.html
Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.
Alternative Proxies: