Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-css-flexbox-1-20140325/
Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox-1/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope,
Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted.
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. # Summary: Which size do percentage heights on flex items resolve against? From: Greg Whitworth Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0062.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0073.html Closed: Invalid Resolved: Editor's discretion
Issue 2. # Summary: Typos From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0090.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0091.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0100.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 3. # Summary: Excessive recalculation of free space From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0097.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0098.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0099.html Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 4. # Summary: Mishandling of zero free space From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0106.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0113.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 5. # Summary: Change 'flex' animatability to "yes, always" From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0169.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0175.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 6. # Summary: Use inline size for block-axis percentage padding From: Christian Biesinger Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0184.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0015.html Closed: Rejected Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0373.html
Issue 7. # Summary: Alternate wording for resolving flex lengths From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0223.html Closed: Retracted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0252.html
Issue 8. # Summary: Alternate wording for resolving flex lengths Take II From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0253.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0398.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0026.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0027.html Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0107.html Note: Current spec has both variants available for review.
Issue 9. # Summary: Better handling of max-height on flex containers From: Greg Whitworth Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0292.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0293.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0294.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0297.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0373.html
Issue 10. # Summary: Regression in flex resolution algorithm From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0311.html Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0397.html Closed: Accepted Verified: (In IRC) Resolved: Editor's discretion
Issue 11. # Summary: Missing negation in description of 'auto' From: Greg Whitworth Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0430.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0016.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 12. # Summary: Clarify impact of alignment properties on abspos items From: Rossen Atanassov Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0043.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0380.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Roughly resolved at WG discussion at Seoul F2F
Issue 13. #
Summary: Make 'flex-basis: auto' compute through to main size property value
From: Tab Atkins
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0046.html
Note: This was discussed earlier, see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jun/0029.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0192.html
Closed: Rejected
Verified: WG member comment
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0056.html
Issue 14. # Summary: Editorial comments From: Alan Stearns Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0057.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0195.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 15. # Summary: Editorial simplification of flex distribution step From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0169.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0197.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editors' discretion
Issue 16. # Summary: Min-height tweak to skip intrinsic aspect ratio items From: Greg Whitworth Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0177.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0011.html Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/53F3B6E3.50903@inkedblade.net Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editors' discretion
Issue 17. # Summary: Typo From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0424.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0425.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 18. # Summary: min-size: auto rules should be main-axis specific From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0074.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0076.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 19. # Summary: min-size: auto should reference 'width' only for flex-basis: auto From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0459.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0007.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editors' discretion Open: NEEDS MORE REVIEW
Issue 20. # Summary: Need keyword for 'auto' flex-basis, which no longer = max-content Proposal: Rename 'auto' to something else, make 'auto' the auto keyword. Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0107.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0008.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0051.html
Issue 21. # Summary: Cross-size of stretched flex size should be definite if flexbox is def From: Rossen Atanassov Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0040.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0012.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Was already fixed in previous LC! Verified:
Issue 22. # Summary: Advise authors to reorder focus order together with box order From: PFWG Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0247.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0256.html Closed: Rejected Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014
Issue 23. # Summary: Masonry effect From: JK Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0046.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0053.html Closed: OutOfScope Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014
Issue 24. # Summary: More precise definition for stretched items. From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0455.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0456.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0458.html Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 25. # Summary: Add flex-wrap: balance From: Cory Brown Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0099.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0100.html Closed: Deferred Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014
Issue 26. # Summary: Better handling of main-axis percentages From: John Rimmer Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0290.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0010.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 27. # Summary: Intrinsic sizes vs. percentage children From: fantasai and Tab Atkins Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0009.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0383.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014
Issue 28. # Summary: Clarify "any definite size constraints" From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0053.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0268.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0270.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0271.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0273.html
Issue 29. # Summary: Possible typo in main-size keyword conversion From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0125.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0274.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 30. # Summary: Restrict min-size: auto overflow check to appropriate axis From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0317.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0319.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 31. # Summary: Question wrt interaction of text wrapping and flex wrapping From: Richard Dodd Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0395.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0440.html Closed: Invalid
Issue 32. # Summary: What is the flexbox height when computed height is indefinite? From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0438.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0283.html Closed: Invalid
Issue 33. # Summary: Shrinkwrapping of block-level flex containers undefined/suboptimal From: fantasai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0502.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0293.html Closed: Rejected Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0293.html
Issue 34. # Summary: Overflow directions should relate to content ordering From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0380.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0285.html Closed: OutOfScope Note: Accepted edits into CSS Box Alignment instead.
Issue 35. # Summary: min-content default problematic for scroll root descendants From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0589.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0282.html Closed: Rejected Verified:
Issue 36. # Summary: Should intrinsic aspect ratio be considered? Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0609.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0616.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0042.html Closed: Invalid Verified:
Issue 37. # Summary: Error in application of intrinsic ratio From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0098.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0288.html Closed: Invalid Verified:
Issue 38. # Summary: Clarify non-application of ::first-line/::first-letter From: Tab Atkins Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0099.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0099.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 39. # Summary: max-content definition is wrong From: fantasai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0277.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014
Issue 40. # Summary: Back-compat concerns with Issue 20 renaming of 'auto' From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0160.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0381.html Open: Closed as no change for now, but requesting more feedback during LC.
Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.
Alternative Proxies: