Hagerman
My inactive conversations are routinely archived. Please select an archive to view the history: |
Archive 1 |
Moved the next half<\s> five sixths of a dozen from bots page to here
...
Bot still being a pain
Enough with this bot already. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.144.60.229 (talk • contribs)
Hi! I enabled my e-mail address
Does it have to be so fast?
Many times I'll notice I forgot to sign and immediately go back to add a sig, only to find that Hagermanbot has beat me to it. Could you put even a short delay on the bot to give users a chance to fix the sig themselves? Even 30 seconds or a minute would probably be plenty. --Milo H Minderbinder 22:58, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Read the top of this page. Trebor 22:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
The bot
The da Vinci Barnstar | ||
Go bot, oh yeah, go bot... Great bot you have; it is one of the most useful thing on Wikipedia, more important than AntiVandal and Orphans. !! The Evil Clown 02:04, 2 March 2007 (UTC) |
I think the bot misplaced a sig
Here a user went in and added to his comment, and the bot came in and signed the middle of the comment. *Mishatx*-In\Out 05:55, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Single edit opt-out
I like Hagermanbot going after me in case I miss something. There are cases when I intend to skip signing, such as here and here. Is there a way we could have a single edit opt-out feature? E.g. we could add an <!--opt-out--> html comment. Especially useful for newsletters and stuff. NikoSilver 18:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC)