Stombs

Hi Stombs, and welcome to Wikipedia.

Thankyou for finding the time to sign up and contribute to our little project. If you're in doubt about anything, you might want to check out some of these pages:

• Welcome, newcomers - a general introduction, and a good starting point
• The help centre and FAQs
• The Manual of Style - a guide to the community's writing conventions

It's also a good idea to sign the new user log and add a little about yourself.

When contributing to a talk page, you can sign your name by typing four tildes after your comments, like this: ~~~~. Some people do not pay attention to unsigned comments. An important note: Please do not add this signature to encyclopedia articles you may edit, even if you have created them. Wikipedia articles are owned by the community, not by any one person.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to me at my talk page, or at the Help desk or Village Pump.

But above all, make sure you be bold when contributing, and have fun!

TPK 06:22, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Style

Hi 'Stombs, could I give you a friendly suggestion, that you read the Wikipedia:Manual of Style before making any more contributions. It may mean that many changes won't need to be made to your entries to knock them into Wiki shape.. Cheers. Moriori 08:54, Aug 13, 2004 (UTC)

Greetings again Stombs. Tks for your response on my talk page. Another friendly suggestion (yes, ANOTHER one), when you post to talk pages your contribution goes on the bottom of the page, not the top, (or at the bottom of the subject you are replying to, as I have done here). Anyway, good to see you are now registered user. Look forward to some entries about the area you live in.Go BOP. Ka kite. Moriori 22:05, Aug 15, 2004 (UTC)

Thank you again, Moriori—just got the message from Bishonen as well about stuff going at the bottom. At work today so better not do quite as much during the weekdays! Noho ora mai. Stombs 23:16, Aug 15, 2004 (UTC)

Wanted ad: Stombs

Hey, Stombs, if you're there, could you please leave a message for me on this page, or on my talk page, so I can talk to you? I really hope you don't let all the VfD listings put you off editing, and I feel kind of bad about that BJAODN crack. (Even though actually making it to BJAODN would be quite an honor - they're very selective these days. :-)) Bishonen 22:16, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Hi, Kiwi bloke

Hello, Stombs, very glad to hear from you. Nice to see you bluelinked, too! Actually, I was mostly worried that you'd notice I'd put up yet more of your pages for deletion - Medinge and Medinge Group - don't know if you did or not - and ship out in disgust at all the stalking and nitpicking. I've been checking out your contribs, an amazing list where you can be observed making excellent edits for twelve hours at a stretch or so. At what I thought was an ungodly hour, too :-) (before I figured about New Zealand). It would be a shame if the only feedback you got on all that work was a crapload of deletion boilerplates. Sorry I was so quick to assume you were another Swedish prankster there - it's just that I've been seeing a lot of those lately, back for the autumn term and writing encyclopedic articles about their girlfriends that run "Lhina Hansson is considered by many people to be the best and most beautiful woman in the world, especially by Swedish guitarist Gustav Bjarnason." (What? Well, yes, I suppose it is kind of funny, if you're in the mood for it. :-))

I notice you've done a good deal of copyediting of other people's work, which is a very useful service. See, your edit topic for the Nanjing Massacre caught my eye: "Serious repairs to typos, grammar—does no one check these?" That's just it: yes, someone does. You did. That's how the wiki works. There's no hierarchy of editing, everybody's an editor, and skilled English speakers are jumping in all the time, the way you did, to give articles a shine, especially new articles by non-native speakers. Many of those do need what's referred to as Cleaning up (or in extreme cases, need Tender loving care). There's a Wikipedia section called Cleanup, where people list entries they come across that are or could be valuable for their encyclopedic content, in order to request that somebody else clean them up. Ideally, the somebody would have good English plus some interest in the subject, but editors are encouraged to Be Bold in selecting themselves for this job, as for everything else. Me, for instance, I just cleaned up an "Engrish" article about a little-known manga book, a subject I know less than nothing about. Suicidally bold, you might say. Anyway, if you think you might be interested in doing some work on Cleanup, I think you could do a lot of good deeds there, with your excellent writing skills. I feel pompous saying welcome to Wikipedia - I've only been here a month myself - but welcome anyway, Stombs. (Btw,it can be a little risky to put messages at the top of talk pages - the convention is to put them at the bottom, and that's where people tend to look for them.) Bishonen 16:56, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Old cars

Thanks for your contribution on the Australian version of the Plymouth Valiant. I'm always interested in learning something new about old cars. RivGuySC 02:30, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Your info about the Monaro/Riviera was new to me and I'll certainly do something with it. Like you, I'd thought the new GTO looked more Buickish. There's nothing there that says Pontiac to me except the grille. RivGuySC 02:06, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)

GM Daewoo

Thanks for your contribution to GM Daewoo Motors. Finally this stub is growing. Very much appreciated. Have a nice day. Kokiri 07:54, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for telling me about this a couple of months ago, Stombs. I have just signed on. I'm very flattered about what you wrote, too. Jackyan 23:10, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Liter->L

In text, I would leave it as litre or liter, depending on the local usage. So if I was talking about "less than a liter of Ketchup" or "multi-litre engines" I would leave it at that. But if it's a mark notating a metric, like "2.2 L engine" we should use the SI convention of using a space then the short symbol - this was discussed in thy wiki style area somewhere a couple of months ago. What do you think?

Don't worry - I know you mean well and aren't picking on me! We're all here to make this the best it can be! --SFoskett 15:18, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

• Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
• Multi-Licensing Guide
• Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Since you've chosen option #1, please copy and paste the text into your user page, which will add the banner describing your choice. – Ram-Man ^{(comment) (talk)}[[]] 22:32, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC)

Cosworth pic

Stombs, I was really pleased to read your nice comment on my RS Cosworth pic. I've put thirty car pics on in the last four days, all taken by myself last summer. Thanks again, such comments are very much appreciated - Adrian Pingstone 21:51, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Impreza

Could we redirect to Subaru Impreza and could you, of course, as nominator, rescind the VfD nomination? Ty! Samaritan 23:23, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Image:19-vc-sle.jpg

What licence is Image:19-vc-sle.jpg which you uploaded released under? Somebody in the WWW 10:54, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

There is no such tag as {{CopyrightFreeUse}}. I think you must mean {{fairuse}} instead. Somebody in the WWW 06:31, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Note to self: I've replied directly to the above user—the tag was not incorrect at the time. Stombs 08:57, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)

Holden Zafira in NZ

Tena koe,

I've looked at the Holden NZ website for several years, and have never seen the Zafira featured, although Opel-badged used Japanese imports are on sale locally according to this website. Only this Australian website has any mention of the Holden Zafira. We get a few Opel-badged cars from Ireland in the UK (but as brand new parallel imports). Quiensabe 01:16 UTC 10 Jan 2005

Note: the Zafira was indeed sold as a Holden in New Zealand and many web sites indicate this.

Brazilian Ford Sierras

I've seen several references to Brazilian Ford Sierras, but I doubt seriously that the Sierra was ever sold, let alone produced, in that country. I speak Portuguese and I've seen numerous websites that confirm this. That segment of the market was served by the Del Rey (a local design despite the resemblance to the last Cortina/Taunus) and the Versailles, a clone of the VW Santana.

It seems unlikely that Ford do Brasil would have tooled up for production of a car that it wouldn't have sold locally, not least as everything they would have produced would have been for the local market. The facelifted Sierra was assembled in Venezuela, so maybe that would have been the source for the Merkur.

Quiensabe Jan 10 2005 13:13 UTC

Quiensabe is correct: I meant the Argentinian models.

Image:0817tmp3.jpg

Where did you get Image:0817tmp3.jpg from? It is obviously not a "Ford New Zealand publicity photograph", as it has a registration plate from Victoria, Australia in the photo. Somebody in the WWW 03:05, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Again responded: source was not incorrect. Stombs 08:59, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)

Re: Volkswagen Golf Plus

No problem. As you can see I've moved most of the content formerly under "Variants" to the specific model sections. This makes more sense to me. SamH 10:47, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Mazda Celtus?

I just saw this article created - you have in the past warned the user responsible (82.42.151.164) for creating fake articles about cars - is this one the same? Regards, Smoddy | Talk 16:55, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Nguyet Anh Duong

why did you chose to Delete the page on Nguyet Anh Duong she is a Influential Vietnamese American.

-Did you take the time to read the article?

-*Bomb Lady: Vietnamese American Makes Tools for War on Terror by Pacific News Service

-Nguyet Anh Duong Accomplishment in Naval technology saved lifes of American Soliders in Iraq and Afganistan.

Would you reconsider your vote?--Bnguyen 06:47, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Apology for my edits

Apologies for my vandalism. I will confine them to the sandbox. I am new to this Wikipedia thing. Advice would be appreciated on using Wikipedia, I am new to this. Please don't ban me. I apologise for any fake articles - these can now be confined to the sandbox. 82.42.151.164 14:13, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)

Opel Manta in UK

The Opel Manta was never badged as a Vauxhall. True, there was a Vauxhall Cavalier coupe and 'Sportshatch', which used the same bodyshells, but those were dropped in 1981, the same year in which Opel dealerships merged with Vauxhall ones. The Manta was the last car to be sold as an Opel in the UK, when it was dropped in 1988. (The Senator was rebadged as a Vauxhall in 1984, but the Monza remained an Opel until it was dropped two years later.)

This site has the history of the Manta, and the Cavalier equivalents. Quiensabe 20 Jan 2005 17:02

Quiensabe is correct—corrected my own info.

Nissan Pulsar/Sunny

Well, I was about to argue with you about the Pulsar/Sunny thing, but then I got confused after some Google searches told me that the B14 and N15 platforms had the same 2535 mm wheelbase and suspension layout (McPherson strut/trailing arm at the front and multilink/beam axle at the rear) as the outgoing B15 Sunny and the current N16 Almera, Sylphy, Sentra and Wingroad. I'm guessing the same underpinnings were retained between generations. Incidentally, one of those searches turned up a New Zealander named ant_marter on the freshalloy.com forum. Was that you? --Pc13 10:34, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

De Lorean vote

Because you voted at Talk:De Lorean on whether or not to move that page to De Lorean Motor Company, I thought you might like to know that another vote has been started at Wikipedia:Requested_moves#De Lorean → De Lorean Motor Company. SamH|Talk 18:30, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Mitsubishi Mirage

I added a fact that Mirage & Colt are sold alongside each other in Australia, and you deleted it saying Mitsubishi ceased selling Mirage's in Australia in 2003. However, if you go to http://www.mitsubishi-motors.com.au you plainly see both Mirage and Colt for sale. This is also confirmed by phoning Mitsubishi Motors Australia.

Maybe in New Zealand it has ceased selling, but not Australia.

And this was added here … why?

Isuzu Gemini

I wrote an article about the Isuzu Gemini in German Wikipedia. There you've got a copyrighted picture of the '85 FF Gemini I'd like to ask you if I can copy it into my German Gemini article -Honza 19:55, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

lots of edits, not an admin

Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 17:27, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the vote of confidence on my new adminship - looks like it's your time too! I'll nominate or support you... --SFoskett 20:14, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

GM Daewoo

• As outlined in WikiProject Automobiles, the home market information is used as the basis in Wikipedia. Stombs 13:50, August 14, 2005 (UTC)

Why did you delete tons of useful information from the original articles (for ex. Chevrolet Nubira) in the process of a copy and paste move, which is NOT how the articles should be moved anyway, and replaced it with information that is simply full of errors? I'm reverting your edits. Please list the pages on WP:RM if you feel there's a need to move them. --DmitryKo 20:28, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

Image source/licensing for Image:86tre nb.gif

The image you uploaded, Image:86tre nb.gif, has no no source information. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Unless the copyright status is provided, the image will be marked for deletion on 24 October 2005.

This message notification has been automatically sent by NotificationBot managed and run by AllyUnion. Please leave comments regarding bot operations at AllyUnion's talk page. Please direct all comments regarding licensing information at Wikipedia talk:Images for deletion. --NotificationBot 12:23, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

• Oh well, too late—did not see this till December. I'll just make a note to put source info in future. Stombs 00:40, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

NZ resident

Hi, I see you're another NZ-based person. If you like, you can add the template {{User NZ res}} to your user page, and this will automatically add you to the category of Wikipedians in New Zealand. --LesleyW 06:59, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Important WikiProject Automobiles Discussion

Hello! As a Wikipedia:WikiProject Automobiles member, I just thought you might want to input your opinions on an important discussion we're currently having about whether articles regarding similar vehicles should be merged into one or split by brand. If you would like to comment or read further, please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles#Articles of Similar Vehicles. Thank you in advance for your thoughts and feedback. Airline 23:52, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Isuzu_Aska_(1994).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Isuzu_Aska_(1994).jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 05:55, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Isuzu_Aska_(2000).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Isuzu_Aska_(2000).jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 04:29, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Auckland meetup

Just to let you know that a meetup is planned in Auckland for the 25th of June (see Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland for more details), and that you are cordially invited. GeorgeStepanek\^talk 00:21, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Pontiac GTO (1974, studio).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pontiac GTO (1974, studio).jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Angr (talk) 12:49, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Liz Shaw

I noticed that on Talk:Liz Shaw (New Zealand)#Why is this article even here? you asked then if anyone nominates the article for deletion to tell you. Well, I have, so I am. --Midnighttonight 03:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

If you want can you take a look at Infiniti G20?

I noticed some of your edits and would like it if you took a look at the Infiniti G20 article. No pressure if you do not feel like it. Zoli Elo 06:38, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Holden Premier (HG series, 1970) s.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Holden Premier (HG series, 1970) s.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 01:28, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Stombs: thanks for the St Mark’s reference! Just spotted it. Jack Yan 05:09, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Ford Laser GL 4-door (1990).jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ford Laser GL 4-door (1990).jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a free image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 13:44, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

P.S. Also Image:Ford LTD (1999).jpg and Image:Ford Fairlane (1997).gif

Image:Holden Monaro GTS (HG series, 1970).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Holden Monaro GTS (HG series, 1970).jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Roguegeek (talk) 20:16, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:EH Premier.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:EH Premier.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Roguegeek (talk) 17:30, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Holden Premier (HG series, 1970).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Holden Premier (HG series, 1970).jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Roguegeek (talk) 17:31, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Rambler American Rogue (1968).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rambler American Rogue (1968).jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Chowbok 20:44, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

P.S. Also Image:1991 Ford Sierra 3-door.jpg, and any other non-free images of cars you may have uploaded.

Unspecified source for Image:Honda Jazz (1993).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Honda Jazz (1993).jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 17:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Honda Jazz (1993).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Honda Jazz (1993).jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 17:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikiproject Automobiles Notification

Hi Stombs, you were on the list of members at WikiProject Automobiles and we are introducing a new way of listing members, as the old list was becoming too long. Our new method involves having all of our members in a category.

To add yourself to the category just add the userbox to your user page by putting {{Wiki Auto Project}} where you want the userbox. Alternatively if you don't like the userbox you can add [[Category:WikiProject Automobiles members|Stombs]] to your userpage.

If you no longer wish to be a member of the project, simply don't add the userbox or category, there's no pressure. Thanks for your time, James086^{Talk | Contribs} 04:30, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Mazda Roadpacer 2400.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mazda Roadpacer 2400.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 15:36, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Nissan Sunny 1200 GX (B210 series, grille).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nissan Sunny 1200 GX (B210 series, grille).jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 16:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

English usage

I now know what you mean about editing difficulties in Wikipedia! See the Beatles’ capitalization discussion (I imagine you can find it under my history). Let the amateurs rule!—Jack Yan 23:36, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to my world, Jack!—Stombs 12:22, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Mainzeal

Calm down, man. You start editing the German-language Wikipedia and let me accuse you of mangling *my* first language before you accuse *me* of 'imperial overreach' into yours, okay? The article was 100% my creation up to that point, and you are welcome to fix it without getting all in a jiffy. Cheers, MadMaxDog 08:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Duly responded.

Gordon Jackson

With regard to the years, it is Wikipedia policy not to link lone years. I deleted the cookery show for two reasons; 1) How was written (saying he "even" did something doesn't sound very encyclopedic) and 2), its completly unreferenced. I will reword it now, and it would be useful if you reference it. --UpDown 10:10, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for that, I now see where it is mentioned in the reference. --UpDown 10:16, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Auckland Meetup 2 Scheduled - Feb 10 2007

You are all invited to Auckland Meetup 2 on the afternoon of Saturday February 10th 2007 at Galbraith's Ale House in Mt Eden. Please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland 2 for details. You can also bookmark Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland to be informed of future NZ meetups. - SimonLyall 05:52, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Audi_NSU_range_(1969).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Audi_NSU_range_(1969).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:26, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Holden Kingswood (HX series, 1976).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Holden Kingswood (HX series, 1976).jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Renata 03:17, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Proton Tiara.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Proton Tiara.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Liftarn 08:40, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Arna_200.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Arna_200.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:58, 14 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 09:58, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Arna 200.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Arna 200.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:46, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Millionth Holden.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Millionth Holden.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:47, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Leyland 18-22 series grilles.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Leyland 18-22 series grilles.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Citroën Bijou.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Citroën Bijou.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:21, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Jonathan Bishop

An article you previously voted on in an AfD has been re-nominated. You can see the discussion at This link. Cardydwen (talk) 14:40, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Triumph Toledo 2-door.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Triumph Toledo 2-door.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:42, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Stombs! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 333 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Hilary Timmins - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Vendela Kirsebom - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Kylie Bax - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Sarah Bradley - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Panagiotis Papadopoulos - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:26, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jack Yan

An editor has nominated Jack Yan, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Yan and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.-gadfium 19:46, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jack Yan

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Jack Yan. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Yan (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Medinge Group

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Medinge Group. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medinge Group. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:8-idealog-cover-small.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:8-idealog-cover-small.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:09, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of St Mark's Church School

The article St Mark's Church School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable school. Unable to verify by independent reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fages (talk) 12:39, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:1980 Austin Metro Range.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:1980 Austin Metro Range.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Fleet Command (talk) 19:48, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Non-Free rationale for File:Lucire-cover-2006.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lucire-cover-2006.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:15, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Non-Free rationale for File:Lucire-cover-20.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lucire-cover-20.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:15, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Idealog

The article Idealog has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Written like an advert. Internet search does not reveal notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Schwede66 02:51, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)