Talk:Family Guy season 4
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Family Guy season 4 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Family Guy season 4 is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on May 22, 2017. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Featured list |
This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Family Guy (season 4). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090825025429/http://www.sptimes.com/2005/05/01/Floridian/Fox_packages_animatio.shtml to http://www.sptimes.com/2005/05/01/Floridian/Fox_packages_animatio.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Family Guy (season 4). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/69hpYEZQi?url=http://jam.canoe.ca/Television/TV_Shows/F/Family_Guy/2005/05/01/pf-1020572.html to http://jam.canoe.ca/Television/TV_Shows/F/Family_Guy/2005/05/01/pf-1020572.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:31, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
"Most acclaimed episodes"
editIt may well be the case that the episodes being listed here are highly regarded, but it needs proper sourcing. The only episode with a semi-valid source is PTV, but the BBC article referenced is from 2008 and well out of date.
Additionally, the phrase "fewer critics responded negatively to the season" doesn't make much sense and is also unsourced in any case. Barry Wom (talk) 11:30, 5 March 2024 (UTC)