This Wikipedian is deceased. His user page is preserved here in his memory.
|
As a Wikipedia editor, I understand that my goal is the destruction of my purpose.
Some subpages
User:Vami_IV/Completionism
User:Vami_IV/Unreliable sources
Image: Schloss Favorite, by Julian Herzog
Pledges
I pledge to...
- ...prioritize the quality of our content over the quantity of our content.
- ...be civil, because of the harm others' incivility has caused me, and the harm my incivility has caused others.
- ...but not to mince words.
- ...stay silent, and generally not speak unless spoken to.
Goals and projects
- Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2024/Submissions/Vami IV
- Goal: Wikipedia:100,000 feature-quality articles
- Also of interest to me: Template:Project missing articles
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Missing articles by dictionary/Handbook of Texas
- Project: Get Fletcher-class destroyer to Featured Topic.
- Project: Rewrite and, if possible, Complete ColonelH's Rutgers articles
- Project: Get Doom (franchise) to Featured Topic.
considering Serengeti National Park to GA+
Toolbelt
- Copypatrol
- User:SuperHamster/CiteUnseen
- User:Headbomb/unreliable
- Template:FAC peer review sidebar
- Template:Project missing articles
- Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to provide copies of deleted articles
In-progress reviews
Thank you
to my off-wiki confederates, who have fed references to me or helped with translations.
- Mamelsberg
- HrcAK47
- TacError
- The volunteer fan translators of the Hololive community
Wisdom
- SuperHamster: "I'm proposing a new adage: the longer a response is proportional to the original post, the more ridiculous that response will be. If the response to an 80 word message is 500 words it ain't gonna be good."
- Johnbod: "5 refs on a line is almost always a sure sign of trouble."
- Tamzin: "The breadth of an SNG is directly proportional to the relevant topic's prevalence as a special interest among autistic people."
- Abraham van Hellsing, Dracula: "We learn from failure, not from success!"
- Simón Bolívar: "The art of victory is learned in defeat."
- Plato, quoting(?) Socrates, "I know that I know nothing."
- Krisgabwoosh: "I edit by the philosophy that there's no reason to create an article that isn't a good article. I don't believe in stubs or adding new entries that will never be expanded upon. Perhaps this limits my output or my article creation count, etc., but I don't mind. It means that every article I contribute to the encyclopedia merits being included."
Essays
- User:JPxG/All essays by size
- User:Tony1/How to improve your writing
- User:Antandrus/observations on Wikipedia behavior
- Wikipedia:Writing about women
- User:Giano/A fool's guide to writing a featured article
- User:Ihcoyc/The problem of anti-supernatural bias
- User:SandyGeorgia/Achieving excellence through featured content
Women in Red
My copypastas
for GAN
===Preamble from Vami===
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. My name is Vami, and I will be your reviewer. During this review I may make small edits such as spelling corrections, but I will only suggest substantive content changes in comments here. For responding to my comments, please use {{Done}}, {{Fixed}}, {{Added}}, {{Not Done}}, {{Doing}}, or {{Removed}}, followed by any comment you'd like to make. As my comments are addressed or rebutted, I will cross them out, and only my comments.<p>My goal as your reviewer is to assess the quality of your work and offer suggestions for its improvement; I want to help you write a truly good article. To this end, I intend to be collaborative and work with a collegial attitude. If I have demonstrated incompetence or caused offense, [[User talk:Vami_IV|please let me know]]. ~~~~
- GA box
Good Article review progress box
|
for FAC
- Source reviewing and spot-checking
;Spotcheck Rationale for method used Format: * All good. * Ditto * Does not support... [quotation] (for single-use citation) * Errors detected, noted below. All other instances good. (for citations used multiple times) * Complete fabrication.