User talk:Dabomb87/Archive 15

Archive 10

←

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

→

Archive 20

ArbCom Election RFC courtesy notice

A request for comment that may interest you is currently in progress at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Arbitration Committee 2. If you have already participated, then please disregard this notice and my apologies. Manning (talk) 08:22, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
You received this message because you participated in the earlier ArbCom secret ballot RFC.

Pelinka proposal

Would you be interested in doing a Pelinka copyedit in exchange for me doing a newsearch for Toney Douglas or another article?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 15:26, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Tony, if I had time I would help with Pelinka regardless of whether you did something in return or not (although your offer is very kind). At this stage, I think you're better off asking someone with more time and ability (Steve Smith (talk · contribs) maybe?) than me. If not, then I'll try to look at the article as soon as possible, which may not be until Thanksgiving, if even that soon. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:34, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Comeback Player award FLC

I know you say not to give you notice, but this one's been open for a while and I'd like to finish up the last outstanding issue, your comment, so it can get closed and run through on the next bot run. A quick check back would be greatly appreciated, thanks! Staxringold _talk^contribs 15:46, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

• I updated the dates. Staxringold _talk^contribs 20:46, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
• Any chance of capping this for the Wednesday bot run? 4 full-throated supports, issues dealt with, etc, etc. It's been open a month now. Staxringold _talk^contribs 21:30, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Waiting for Bucs. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:13, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

• :( Thanks, guess it waits til Sunday. Heh. Sad, cuz the only issue he had left was the linking refs you already replied to. Staxringold _talk^contribs 03:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Basketball Hall of Fame update

There seems to be an agreement on the FLC. Both opposers express willingness to support if the paragraphs are expanded. I don't think I can finish within the nomination period. If you agree with withdrawal, then could you remove the nomination from FLC. Thanks.—Chris!_c/t 03:35, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

I guess I don't want to withdraw anymore.—Chris!_c/t 04:35, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Could you take a look Dennis Johnson for me? I am planning for FAC in the near future. An extra pair of eyes would be nice. Thanks—Chris!_c/t 00:38, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

I'll chip away at it over the weekend. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:54, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

• For the Basketball Hall of Fame, I significantly expanded the paragraphs. Can you go through them to make sure the sentences are grammatically correct? Thanks—Chris!_c/t 02:51, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
  • I think it looks good now. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:03, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

RE

Holy S***!!! I totally forgot about that. I got sick recently and it has kept me off of here. I totally meant to review that. I'll see what I can do.--WillC 06:06, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Cricket World Cup records/archive1

Hi, sorry I haven't had time to revisit the article previously but TRM has done some good work and I'm happy with it now. I've struck out my previous comment on the removal discussion page and confirmed that it is now okay. ----Jack | ^{talk page} 13:58, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks for your prompt response. Dabomb87 (talk) 13:59, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

the FLC standards list

I got List of state highways in Hamilton County, New York up to standards a while ago. What's holding to strike it out of curiousity. (if you post her, don't leave me a talkback post thing, I'll watch my watchlist.)Mitch32^{(A fortune in fabulous articles can be yours!)} 14:27, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Criterion 3b: "In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists; it is not a content fork, does not largely recreate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article." In other words, some people think it's a content fork and that it could be merged into another article. You may want to ask about this on WT:FLC. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:15, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

It has for a long time and there is nowhere suitable to merge, that's been made well. A lot of it is the fact it doesn't follow the same structure.Mitch32^{(A fortune in fabulous articles can be yours!)} 15:48, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm afraid I can't help you much, then. Try asking at WP:ROADS. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:12, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

List of international cricket centuries by Virender Sehwag

Looks to be worthy of FL. I doubt we'll see any more newcomers because of the extent of cricket lists. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 00:38, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Noted. See also my comment to YellowMonkey. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:56, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Also, YellowMonkey rarely edits at all on weekends. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 00:57, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

I know; I've already taken those circumstances into account. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:05, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Just went to re-review the list and saw that it was already promoted; sorry I didn't come sooner. After looking at the list, however, I probably would have remainded undeclared anyway. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 21:07, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Charlie Chaplin filmography

Hi. Could you take another look at the Charlie Chaplin filmography? I'm looking for support to make it a featured list.Jimknut (talk) 00:21, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Unfortnately, I don't have time to review the article right now. You might ask Nehrams2020 (talk · contribs) to take a look. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:34, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Motion to reopen ArbCom case "Mattisse"

ArbCom courtesy notice: You have received this notice because you particpated in some way on the Mattisse case or the associated clarification discussion.

A motion has recently been proposed to reopen the ArbCom case concerning Mattisse. ArbCom is inviting editor comment on this proposed motion.

For the Arbitration Committee, Manning (talk) 03:59, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Master of the Rolls

Sorry to bother you, but the FLC work I've done seems to have addressed your concerns. Would you mind taking another look? Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 14:42, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/World Series Most Valuable Player Award/archive1

You might want to promote this now... All comments have been resolved. -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 01:06, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Can't; I've reviewed and supported it. See my comment at IMatthew's talk page. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:07, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

He hasn't replied for two days... New director? Laugh out loud, jokes. -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 01:11, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

My sandbox

Can you please run a dash and delink script on my sandbox? We're talking about reverting Sly & the Family Stone to an older revision that just needs a little cleanup. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 20:33, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Done. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:48, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop

As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.

For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (talk) 08:05, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

2007 Pan American Games medal table

Hi Dabom! Could you review the list 2007 Pan American Games medal table? Regards; Felipe Menegaz 00:14, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, but I don't have time at the moment. You might ask Giants2008 (talk · contribs), Geraldk (talk · contribs), or Scorpion0422 (talk · contribs) for help. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:26, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you! Felipe Menegaz 01:29, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Now it is a FLC, could you participate? Felipe Menegaz 16:10, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Help

Well, you helped me before with Rumford Prize, so I'm wondering if you could use your special powers to dig up some gruib on HMS Anson (79). If you don't find anything also try "King George V class battleship". I need some "reliable" sources and you're the best shot I have. Ty in advance for the e-mails :) ResMar 19:29, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Res, I'll try to find stuff over the weekend. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:02, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Scribblenauts/GA1

Hi there. Talk:Scribblenauts/GA1 has been up for almost a month now and only one person responded. Can you help out with the process. Secret Saturdays (talk) 23:23, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't have time at the moment. Maybe ask for help at WT:GAN? Dabomb87 (talk) 00:32, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Skunk Anansie discography

Hi!, as you recently assessed this article in the previous FL nomination, would it be okay if you could re-assess the second nomination? :). Cheers and many thanks!Marcus Bowen (talk) 15:44, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

I don't want to promise anything, but I'll take a look when I can. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:48, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks very much :). Have addressed and resolved the pointers you made ready for an approval or oppose :).Marcus Bowen (talk) 18:48, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Mindreader

You rascal :) You seem to have gotten to everything already. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:47, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

You caught me :) What shall my punishment be? Dabomb87 (talk) 16:48, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

You can choose between my first-born, or my "job" at FAC :) Since I need to go to the airport today, I may not promote 'til tomorrow: will see how my time goes. Thanks again ! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:51, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Regarding your edit

... at Lundomys [1]: in what way does this improve the layout of the article? (This is an honest question, not a rhetorical one or an attack.) And should I use this parameter of {{reflist}} in other articles with similar layouts? Thanks, Ucucha 21:09, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Three-column reflists break in some browsers and some screens. Also, using colwidth allows the reflists to dynamically expand or contract to fit the reader's screen and browser. It's not necessary for short reflists, but for longer ones, it is very useful. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:11, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

OK, I see that when I narrow down my browser window it moves from three to two columns--which is great. Thanks for the tip and I'll also be using it for other long reflists in the future. Ucucha 21:17, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Re:Question about Olympic list

I don't know if's essential, but I wouldn't have anything against adding horses to the list, if they could be sourced. As for this FLC, I took a look at it and didn't see anything wrong with it, so I see no need for me to leave comments. -- Scorpion0422 II (Talk) 14:39, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Sportsperson of the Year (Czechoslovakia)

Hello, I would like to ask about the FL nomination of the Sportsperson of the Year (Czechoslovakia). I nominated it 24 days ago. All the requirements which appeared during the nomination process were met. The article has recieved three supports, and is not listed among the nominations older than 10 days which need more reviews. If it needed more reviews, I would expect that it was listed there 2 weeks ago. I saw that some nominations were positively closed with three supports. So, is it possible to close this nomination as well? Thank you. Jan.Kamenicek (talk) 16:37, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

While FLC is not a vote, three supports has proved to be the borderline minimum needed for an FLC to pass; this means that while that happens, we (the FLC directors) really want to see more opinions before having to close the nomination. That said, if a list looks good to go, and has been open for a while, a director will probably promote it. In case you were wondering, I won't be closing this one since I reviewed and supported it. I hope that answered your question. Regards, Dabomb87 (talk) 00:46, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

OK, I understand. Thanks for explanation. Jan.Kamenicek (talk) 08:10, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Dan Povenmire/archive1

Responded. The Flash ^{talk} 21:12, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

En dashes in article's name

You directed me to WP:DASHES regarding en dashes in articles' names, but did you read what you had directed me to? If you have not, I would suggest you go read it again more thoroughly. I think you might have misunderstood the concept of en dashes. I know how to use en dashes properly, so you do not need to explain it to me.

An en dash used correctly to show disjunction does not have spaces around it. For example: The en dash used in "Canada–United States relations" is correct. This is used to show the relationship between Canada and United States. My explanation is also supported in the linked that you had directed me to. En dashes used correctly to show disjunction do not have spaces around them. Only use space around en dashes if en dashes are used in place of em dashes. En dashes and em dashes are not the same. Please take some time to research on this and stop introducing incorrect usage of the en dash in articles' names. I would suggest that you pick up a college-level grammar handbook and refer to the section on en dashes. Thanks. —RJN (talk) 03:36, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Are you going to tell me that Texas A&M University–Commerce should be "Texas A&M University – Commerce"? Not according to the Handbook of Texas![2] So according to you, they are wrong. Most universities' names do not have spaces. Names of colleges and universities should be the way they are. For example: University of Wisconsin–Madison,[3] not "University of Wisconsin – Madison" according to you. For the record, I did not move the UWM page. There have been other people, besides me, that have moved articles to en dashes without spacing.

I do not have time to watch user talk pages, so please respond on my talk page if you would like an immediate response or attention. Also, I am busy this week so I will not have time to discuss at length regarding the correct usage of the en dash. Thanks. —RJN (talk) 04:24, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

RJN, MOSDASH says: "Spacing: All disjunctive en dashes are unspaced, except when there is a space within either one or both of the items (the New York – Sydney flight; the New Zealand – South Africa grand final; June 3, 1888 – August 18, 1940, but June–August 1940)." This is to prevent the unfortunate gluing together of "Canada–United", which sounds more like the name of some new airline. Above, you're referring to the use of spaced en dashes as interrupters, not to show disjunctions. Tony (talk) 07:07, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Dabomb87. You have new messages at Rambo's Revenge's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hey

Now that the date delinking thing is in the past, would you consider running RfA? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:22, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the offer, but not at the moment. See these three links. Dabomb87 (talk) 05:18, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Deletion query

Hi, I can confirm it was not my deletion :). no worries there, you've gotta ask anyway :) Marcus Bowen (talk) 22:23, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

List of international cricket five wicket hauls by Muttiah Muralitharan

Can you please refrain from closing at the moment, regards. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 01:58, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Ok now ;) Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 02:19, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Ooops... Thanks. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 22:38, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Chaplin filmography

Yes, I'm still following the FLC. I haven't seen any new comments lately. Jimknut (talk) 23:50, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Family Guy

Unfortunately, it hasn't. The review section only has three brief reviews, one of which appears to be a user of a website rather than a staff member (one of those websites where anyone can post their own review). They've said they're gonna search for more reviews. Ωphois 08:03, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Apparently there do not exist many reviews for Family Guy's fifth season. What is usually done in a case where a request is not possible to be fulfilled? Ωphois 16:06, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

If a request is genuinely unactionable (i.e. unnecessary or impossible be address), and the list is not seriously affected by that request not being fulfilled, then the director may ignore it. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:23, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Dabomb how can the artical fail if we have 2 supporrt and no oppose.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 16:40, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

There was only one support. See also Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Closure log. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:42, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Just for future refrences how many those it need.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 16:45, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

If by "those" you are referring to "supports", there is no magic number; FLC is not a vote. However, I generally don't promote lists with fewer than three full reviews and supports, as that really isn't enough information for me to gauge the consensus. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:47, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

i see so your the one who is going to c;ose the FG cast to right thats cause you doo not review.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 16:58, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Exactly. Sorry I can't help you out with that article. Dabomb87 (talk) 17:00, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

would you say that when TRM finishes the review you can close it.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 17:36, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Family Guy cast

Dabonb i now TRM is moveing to another house so he will not be able to dicusse the FLC , so can you review it when you got time.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 13:39, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Your slip is showing

Who, me? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:15, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

FLC delegate

I remember seeing somewhere that you were going to move in December, and that FLC was about to be short on avaliable delegates. I would be honored to be a substitute delegate, provided that the FLC community has no objections. Might want to let them know about this discussion on FLC talk. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 13:49, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you! Dabomb87 (talk) 16:25, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Padmé

Sorry for being inappropriately bold with moving the FAR to the FARC. Thing is I knew that it needed a review, but I completely spaced and blocked that fact out. Sorry again! Here's part of a cookie. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:06, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Adding the star

I have noticed you reverted my edit of adding the star to the recently promoted list Sportsperson of the Year (Czechoslovakia), because it is a job for a bot. However, I just followed the instructions written at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/archiving, where it is written, that the star can be added, and the bot will do the rest. So if this info is not valid anymore, the page should be updated. Thanks. Jan.Kamenicek (talk) 00:03, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for directing my attention to that page – there are a few things that did need to be updated. I guess you can restore the star; I actually didn't know that you could put the star on yourself without messing up the bot. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:06, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

OK, no problem. Jan.Kamenicek (talk) 00:09, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Request for Advice and Peer Review

You have reviewed one of my DYK Noms before, and I wanted to get your assistance with an issue I am facing.

As a part of my work on improving and wikifying community college articles, I am working on Rock Valley College. As can be viewed by the history, I have made several changes to the article by adding appropriate references and and NPOV content. However, there is a section called Rock_Valley_College#Controversy that was put together by an editor that only edits this one page. I have entered into a discussion with the talk page and the room agrees the section should be removed or rewritten. I have not edited it yet but made a suggestion for the section at on the talk page atTalk:Rock_Valley_College#A_review_of_citations_and_suggested_text_for_controversy. However, the user,Weezer4718 (talk • contribs has begun to get personal. I have pointed him in the direction of the appropriate policies, but the editor seems to have an ax to grind, and I wish to avoid any edit war before it begins. I would appreciate any thoughts any one has on how to improve the suggestion, and the section mentioned, and if you do or do not agree the section violates WP:NPOV, WP:POV, WP:BLP, orWP:Universities standards. Also, feel free to tell me if I am in the wrong as well. All comments appreciated. IlliniGradResearch (talk) 17:35, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

IlliniGrad: I wish I could help out, but I don't have time right now, and the dispute seems rather complicated. Do see Wikipedia:Criticism sections and Wikipedia:Criticism for guidelines on whether a "controversy" section is warranted, and if so, how it should be organized. On a short skim, it does seem that the section violates our policies on WP:NPOV and undue weight. I suggest moving the entire section to the talk page for now, as it is a BLP nightmare. Remind all users to focus on the content and not on other users. Personally, I think that if there is any recoverable info from that section, it should be briefly summarized in the history section rather than in a POV-fork section. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 21:25, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

I appreciate the help, and advice. Could you could copy and paste that statement on the talk page regarding the controversy and the BLP issues, as it would help build the case in the room. I agree, its a BLP nightmare. It would be a big help. IlliniGradResearch (talk) 21:29, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Done. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:44, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the assist. Its my goal to revamp these CC pages into something useful, and at times it can be contentious. Feel free to email me at anytime. IlliniGradResearch (talk) 22:01, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Cato June FAC

Thanks for noting the ref. I have swapped it out. Please consider getting further involved in the discussion or supporting the article.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:00, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

FLC of numbered roads in Kawartha Lakes

I was wondering if you had any thoughts as to what I can do with the FLC for List of numbered roads in Kawartha Lakes, Ontario (without regards to the article itself, as I assume you intend to remain neutral)? Though I have responded to, and fixed many of the problems presented, the editors who have opposed are not returning to nullify their oppose or respond to my comments, and I do not wish for the nomination to close given their current votes. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 21:38, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

I can understand your predicament. Unfortunately, this time of the year is the worst for review processes; those who want to nominate articles have more time to write and submit them to FAC/FLC, but at the same time there are fewer reviewers (on vacation). The only thing you can do is contact the reviewers and ask them to revisit. I'm willing to keep the FLC open for one more week, but past that I'll need to close it, and you'll have to resolve the remaining issues on the talk page. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:49, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Alright. Hopefully like me, they've just lost it from their watchlist already. Thank you for the extension :) - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 21:54, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Have I told you lately...

...that you totally rock? In the last 5 minutes you've beaten me to making a response 3 times on 3 different pages (about 2 different issues). I just love it when people can read my mind, and I really appreciate your help!! :) Karanacs (talk) 22:05, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Karanacs, what took 'ya so long ? [4] SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:07, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Dash script

Thanks for pointing me to it! It will really help with the type of cleanup editing I usually do to articles. While I'm here, I'll hit the FLC needing a revisit shortly. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 22:03, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Lisa Simpson

Hey iam trying to get lisa to FA could you take a look at this--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 23:36, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

If you just need basic copy-editing, I might be able to take a look over the weekend. Otherwise, I won't have much time to help out, nor would I be much aid anyway. Have you asked veteran WP:SIMPSONS users such as Theleftorium (talk · contribs), Scorpion0422 (talk · contribs), Gran2 (talk · contribs), or Cirt (talk · contribs)? Dabomb87 (talk) 03:07, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes all of them--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 18:37, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Tran Nghe Tong

Thanks for that. Can you run the year unlinking and whatnot on the other articles created by Grenouille vert (talk · contribs) recently? thanks YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (Invincibles Featured topic drive:one left) 03:47, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

I think I got them all. I'm turning in for tonight, but if there are any others, I'll be happy to run the scripts on them when I can. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:55, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

FA

Since you are the only one who replied at the talk page, may I ask you this question:

What are the FA you have enjoyed reading the most, say the top 10? 128.232.247.48 (talk) 18:29, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

RE: Note

Thanks, I am aware of this. Using some templates and in general a bad habit. Will be more careful in the future. --Merovingian (T, C, L) 01:02, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

BHOF list

Hey, TRM made some comments. I think I've dealt with all of them. Could you go through it and made sure everything is in order? Thanks—Chris!_c/t 20:47, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Quest

i want to nominate again the FG season 5 but i do not now ifenough time has passed to nominateit again, has it?--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 14:55, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Two weeks is probably enough, yes, but has any substantial work been done on the article since the FLC ended? Dabomb87 (talk) 16:38, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

No not realy i mean TRM did not finish the review, goodraise was too busy sohe left it on neutral and ohipos only concer left was the recep that there are not enough.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 17:43, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Ask each of them if their concerns were resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:48, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Good raise said yes Ophios said that yees(exepct the recep) and i am still waiting aa feedback from TRM--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 19:36, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Moscow - St. Petersburg

Sorry and thanks for informing me. Will be more careful in the future. --Choij (talk) 23:55, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

No problem. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:47, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Vancouver

		WikiProject Vancouver
		You have been invited to participate in Operation Schadenfreude to restore the article Vancouver back to featured article status.

- Mkdw^talk 08:19, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

PS, while in the editing screen, I see you've left a personal message above the edit box that is title "Please read before posting". How were you able to do that? Mkdw^talk 08:29, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Editnotice. As for the Vancouver project, I wish I could help but I don't have any time. Sorry. Good luck, Dabomb87 (talk) 14:10, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Glad to see you on the article =) Mkdw^talk 00:13, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

List of Minnesota Vikings head coaches

Hey man, thanks for reviewing List of Minnesota Vikings starting quarterbacks. Without your help, we wouldn't have yet another featured list here! As a follow-up to that list, you may have noticed that I have now nominated List of Minnesota Vikings head coaches for featured list status. I would therefore like to ask you to make a couple of comments about that list, provided that you have enough spare time on your hands. Many thanks. – PeeJay 10:52, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I won't have time until the new year. Sorry, Dabomb87 (talk) 00:53, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

OK, no worries. It's looking like the list will be turned down anyway as there are only seven items in it. To be honest, I don't see why the number of items should have any bearing on the assessment of a list's quality, but there ya go! – PeeJay 02:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Peer review?

Dabomb, I am hoping to get List of American politicians who admit to cannabis use to featured status eventually. I am currently looking for reviewers to assist with a peer review, before I waste any time at FLC if the list is very subpar. If interested, you are welcome to provide feedback, keeping in mind the requirement for FL status. I just thought it would be nice to know what I need to work on before even attempting FL status. Thanks, and best wishes! --Another Believer _(Talk) 20:29, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, but I won't have time for any reviews or copy-edits until next year. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:35, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Archive 10

←

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

→

Archive 20