Sirdog
| This is Sirdog's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
 | This user does not mind criticism. Feel free to let him know if he did something wrong. |
| Index |
   | SCAM WARNING I do not review drafts or newly created pages for payment. I never have. I do not possess any special permissions - technical or procedural - that would allow me to guarantee the outcome of any article or draft. Legitimate reviewers at Articles for Creation and New Page Patrol are volunteers and will never ask for payment to get a draft into the main site, improve a draft, restore a deleted article, or mark an article as indexable by search engines. If someone contacts you with such an offer, it is a scam. To report it, send a copy of the email, including headers, to paid-en-wp wikipedia.org. |
Question from Possiblegermany (17:38, 21 August 2024)
editHello there! I am curious which tools you use that are available within Wiki settings. I don't want to select every option and have my interface confused. Which gadgets are the most helpful for you? Thanks! --Possiblegermany (talk) 17:38, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Welcome to Wikipedia, Possiblegermany! This is a fairly difficult question to answer, as there are a lot of gadgets, and a lot of it has to do with what part of Wikipedia to edit interests you. Going down my gadgets list...
Navigation popups:
- Hovering over an article link, such as Emma Watson, gives a blurb without having to click the link itself.Open external links in a new tab or window
- Links that lead outside of Wikipedia automatically open in a new browser tab.Twinkle
- A very powerful script that makes it easy to do things such as warn vandals, submit articles to the venue for editors to discuss deletion, mark articles as needing some sort of attention by editors, and a lot more. I highly recommend this script if not already enabled. See Wikipedia:Twinkle for more information.Reference Tooltips
- Hovering your cursor over a citation will give you a blurb of the citation, rather than being forced to click it and going to the bottom of the page.Display watchlist notices
- Many on-wiki activities, such as when editors request administrator privileges, are advertised on your watchlist at the very top, since for many people it's a page that's visited often. I'd advise turning this on if it isn't by default.HotCat
- Easily add categories to articles.Add a clock to the personal toolbar
- Aside from the clock being somewhat useful (considering it's in UTC), if you click it, it will reset the cache for Wikipedia, which is useful in circumstances where clearing the cache is necessary for some thing you are working on or looking at to update in your browser window when refreshing isn't cutting it.MoreMenu
- A handy script that lets you have a dropdown which displays a lot more useful information about a page. For users, it'll let you quickly see their blocks, their statistics, and for articles lets you easily navigate to things like their protection log and such.
- I could go on, but here are a couple that I find help me a lot. Cheers! —Sirdog (talk) 20:58, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive
edit| New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
How can I edit an Wikipedia Article? --Yor Briar (talk) 08:35, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Welcome to Wikipedia, Yor Briar! To edit an article you can click the button labeled
Edit
near the top right of the page. It's directly underneath theAdd languages
button. You may sometimes instead seeView source
, which indicates the article is protected from editing by an administrator. See Help:Editing for more information. Feel free to ask me any further questions you may have. Cheers! —Sirdog (talk) 22:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Murder of Alayna Ertl
editHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Murder of Alayna Ertl you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alexeyevitch -- Alexeyevitch (talk) 07:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2024
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which
applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past
. - A request for comment is open to discuss whether Notability (species) should be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.
Arbitration
- Following a motion, remedies 5.1 and 5.2 of World War II and the history of Jews in Poland (the topic and interaction bans on My very best wishes, respectively) were repealed.
- Remedy 3C of the German war effort case ("Cinderella157 German history topic ban") was suspended for a period of six months.
- The arbitration case Historical Elections is currently open. Proposed decision is expected by 3 September 2024 for this case.
Miscellaneous
- Editors can now enter into good article review circles, an alternative for informal quid pro quo arrangements, to have a GAN reviewed in return for reviewing a different editor's nomination.
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in September 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,900 articles and 26,200 redirects awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
Question from Md Fahim Chowdhury on File talk:Telegram logo.svg (06:25, 3 September 2024)
editSay hello and aks your question. E.g.How do l create a citation --Md Fahim Chowdhury (talk) 06:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Welcome to Wikipedia, Md Fahim Chowdhury! There is a fantastic page about how to add citations located at Help:Referencing for beginners. If you have any specific questions that the page does not seem to address, feel free to follow up with me. Cheers! —Sirdog (talk) 23:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Question from Mzansiknightsa (20:52, 6 September 2024)
editHi there. I've got a question regarding editors who constantly engage content that I've edited to change it somehow. It is either to omitt referenced facts or to subtly focus soely on negative aspects of the person in question.
Do I keep re-editing the article until they relent, or is there a way to protect the content from being changed in this way?
Best regards --Mzansiknightsa (talk) 20:52, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Welcome to Wikipedia, Mzansiknightsa. It is never acceptable to repeatedly edit an article to restore (or remove) content edited by others unless it is blatant vandalism (which has a very specific definition and scope on Wikipedia) or the removal of restored content is to uphold our policy on the content which may be in biographies of living persons. Short of that, you should have a discussion on the talk page of the article to reach a consensus. Continually editing to restore (or remove) content may constitute editing warring and result in sanctions from administrators. If talk page discussion does not seem to work you can review additional options at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. —Sirdog (talk) 08:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Administrator Elections: Updates & Schedule
edit| Administrator Elections | Updates & Schedule |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors September Newsletter
editGuild of Copy Editors September Newsletter
  Hello and welcome to the September newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since June. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Election news: Project coordinators play an important role in our WikiProject. Following the mid-year Election of Coordinators, we welcomed Mox Eden to the coordinator team. Dhtwiki remains as Lead Coordinator, and Miniapolis and Wracking returned as assistant coordinators. If you'd like to help out behind the scenes, please consider taking part in our December election – watchlist our ombox for updates. Information about the role of coordinators can be found here. Blitz: 13 of the 24 editors who signed up for the June 2024 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 169,404 words comprising 41 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: 38 of the 59 editors who signed up for the July 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 482,133 words comprising 293 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: 10 of the 15 editors who signed up for the August 2024 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 71,294 words comprising 31 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: Sign up here to earn barnstars in our month-long, in-progress September Backlog Elimination Drive. Progress report: As of 05:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 233 requests since 1 January, and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 2,824 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we do without you! Cheers from Baffle gab1978 and your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Mox Eden and Wracking. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Message sent by Baffle gab1978 (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:54, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Saying hello!
editHi Sirdog! I'm new here and just wanted to contact you as my new mentor, do you have any tips to start collaborating with Wikipedia? Thanks! Monicagoy (talk) 09:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Welcome back to Wikipedia, Monicagoy. I don't think I'm your mentor, as my dashboard doesn't list you as a mentee, but that's not really important. Some tips include...
- Read up on the fundamental pillars that Wikipedia uses to direct how it runs alongside what Wikipedia is not. This will save you a lot of heartache down the road. Many an editor has been blocked or dealt with considerable negative attention due to not understanding these things.
- Wikipedia has a lot of rules, conventions, policies, and guidelines. If you decide to dig deep, you can get overwhelmed very easily. However, one of our guidelines is to be bold. In other words, just do what you believe makes the most since to improve something, and generally you will be fine. Just make sure if you are corrected, directly or indirectly, to take the criticism with stride and learn from it. That's how 99% of the memberbase gets up to speed.
- There is a Discord server for Wikipedia editors, if you are so inclined. Can be an more intuitive way to ask questions and connect with others if the style of talk page discussion is not clicking yet.
- A very well respected and easy task to begin your editing career is to fight vandalism. Make sure you read the definition of vandalism (click the blue word), as it's very specific You can also check out the Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit, a "task force" so to speak of editors that maintain high quality resources on how to fight vandalism.
- Once you qualify, enable Wikipedia:Twinkle. It's so popular and well used that even official pages describing how to do something will simply assume you have it and tell you to use it. I spent a long time doing things manually that Twinkle will let you do in clicks.
- The Wikipedia:Task Center is a good place to get ideas on what to do if you aren't sure on what you want to do. You can also peruse our many Wikipedia:Backlogs and decide to whittle away at one.
- If you ever want to ask a quick question on-wiki, you can't ever really go wrong with doing so at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, a venue designed specifically for newer editors to ask random questions about how the site works.
- I could go on, but I think the above should give you a very nice head start. I hope they help, and feel free to drop by whenever if you have more questions.
—Sirdog (talk) 10:39, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Murder of Alayna Ertl
editThe article Murder of Alayna Ertl you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Murder of Alayna Ertl for comments about the article, and Talk:Murder of Alayna Ertl/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alexeyevitch -- Alexeyevitch (talk) 03:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Responding to opposes at rfa
editI noticed your comment at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Significa liberdade. It's not entirely without precedent to respond directly to opposes (see my RfA). I will say that you're right that it does go against conventional wisdom even if I've never really understood why. If you're curious, I go into this further in my debrief. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 11:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Clovermoss: Good to hear from you . Yeah, it wasn't my intention to imply that it is unprecedented but against conventional wisdom. The "wisdom" probably stems from the idea that, if justifying an action in response to an oppose vote, the justification may not be good enough for some voters and thus potentially prompt more opposes than may have been cast otherwise. But I'm not a big fan of that rationale. A lot of the conventional wisdom surrounding RfA seems to revolve around minimizing opposes, both as a pragmatic "how to not lose" guide but probably also a "how to make the process as painless as possible" guide, which is fair considering how grueling it can be, but I think in some cases it does more harm than good.
- I'm also familiar with your debrief, as I've tried to read most any debrief I become aware of, but I appreciate you reaching out with more information. Cheers! —Sirdog (talk) 13:02, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Question from Zavolzhye on Tupperware (20:50, 18 September 2024)
editHi, I’m not sure how to flag a sentence but the entry “Women at parties were exhorted at parties to sell more via the slogan ‘No Sex, No Sup, Just Tup-Tup-Tup!’” and the citation provided are wholly inaccurate. The article cited even states that this was made up by the man who was being interviewed. I didn’t want to just remove the sentence. --Zavolzhye (talk) 20:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Welcome to Wikipedia, Zavolzhye! Thank you for taking the time to find the error and bring it to the attention of an editor. I've gone ahead and removed the sentence entirely. While I understand the hesitation to do something like that yourself, one of Wikipedia's tenets is to make changes that feel like they are helpful even if unsure of our rules so long as you do so in good faith. You may be reverted in the event you are wrong, but that isn't necessarily a bad thing, but more of a learning experience. Many newer editors tend to learn that way. In this case, removing the sentence is helpful since it was providing misinformation, and there isn't really a way to re-word it where it is relevant or useful to the article. Feel free to point out any future things you see, but feel unsure of handling yourself, and I'll be more than happy to advise you. Happy editing! —Sirdog (talk) 22:47, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Question from Kevinfarnan (03:48, 20 September 2024)
editHello the person in this article died from Medical assistance in death not assisted suicide there is a difference iny country how can this be changed --Kevinfarnan (talk) 03:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Welcome to Wikipedia, Kevinfarnan. I apologize for my tardy reply. I would advise you to read the messages left on your talk page by R0paire-wiki as I assume your question relates to this reverted edit. Wikipedia requires reliable sources for the information that it presents, and your relationship to Mike Farnan would not qualify. If you have more specific questions, do not hesitate to reach out to me again or the Teahouse, a venue designed specifically for newer editors. If you choose the former, I'll endeavor to respond more promptly. —Sirdog (talk) 04:41, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
edit
Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Keep local on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Question from Lunaboost on Help:Introduction to editing with VisualEditor/6 (12:01, 26 September 2024)
editHow we create our company profile? --Lunaboost (talk) 12:01, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Welcome to Wikipedia, Lunaboost. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia with the intent of writing articles in a balanced manner that are neutral and reliably sourced. Wikipedia may not be used as a means of advertising any person, place, or thing. Whether an article on an entity may exist is based on our notability criteria and, for companies, we have even more stringent standards due to attempts by such entities to undermine the principles I've highlighted just now.
- If you are writing on behalf of any such entity, and are financially compensated for doing so, you are legally required to disclose this relationship immediately - or affirmatively decline the existence of such relationship - before you continue editing. —Sirdog (talk) 13:52, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Question from Myntrashopper (19:52, 29 September 2024)
editHow can earn money with you on editing --Myntrashopper (talk) 19:52, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Already asked and answered at Wikipedia:Teahouse#How_can_earn_money_in_Wikipedia. -- Hoary (talk) 02:49, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2024
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- Administrator elections are a proposed new process for selecting administrators, offering an alternative to requests for adminship (RfA). The first trial election will take place in October 2024, with candidate sign-up from October 8 to 14, a discussion phase from October 22 to 24, and SecurePoll voting from October 25 to 31. For questions or to help out, please visit the talk page at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
- Following a discussion, the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion G8 to F2. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
- A request for comment is open to discuss whether there is a consensus to have an administrator recall process.
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Historical elections has been closed.
- An arbitration case regarding Backlash to diversity and inclusion has been opened.
- Editors are invited to nominate themselves to serve on the 2024 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission until 23:59 October 8, 2024 (UTC).
Miscellaneous
- If you are interested in stopping spammers, please put MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist and MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist on your watchlist, and help out when you can.
Administrator Elections: Call for Candidates
editAdministrator Elections | Call for Candidates
The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Call for candidates.
Here is the schedule:
- October 8–14 - Candidate sign-up (we are here)
- October 22–24 - Discussion phase
- October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
Please note the following:
- The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
- Prospective candidates are advised to become familar with the community's expectations of adminstrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
- The process will have a one week call for candidates phase, a one week pause to set up SecurePoll, a three-day period of public discussion, followed by 7 days of no public discussion and a private vote using SecurePoll.
- The outcomes of this process are identical to making requests for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA or administrator elections.
- Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.
Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. A separate user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.
To avoid sending too many messages, this will be the last mass message sent about administrator elections. If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Administrator Elections: Discussion phase
editThe discussion phase of the October 2024 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:
- October 22–24 - Discussion phase
- October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
- November 1–? - Scrutineering phase
During October 22–24, we will be in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages will open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Discussion phase.
On October 25, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RFA.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Question from ADPettorossi (13:29, 23 October 2024)
editI would like to have this personal page in Wikipedia. What should I do? Thanks, Alberto
=
editAlberto Pettorossi is a "Docens Turris Virgatae" of Theoretical Computer Science at the University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Career He obtained a Laurea degree "cum laude" in Electronic Engineering in 1971 from the University of Rome "La Sapienza". From that same university, he also obtained in 1973 a Postgraduate Diploma in Engineering of Control Systems and Automatic Computing. In 1978 he received a Master degree in Computer Science from the School of Computer and Information Science at Syracuse University, N.Y., USA. In 1984 he obtained a Ph.D. in Computer Science from the University of Edinburgh, UK. From 1975 to 1988 he was a researcher at the Institute of Systems Analysis and Informatics (IASI) of the Italian National Research Council (CNR) in Rome. From 1988 until 2017 he was professor of Computer Science at the University of Rome "Tor Vergata". In 2017 he retired with the honorary title of "Docens Turris Virgatae".
Awards In 1988 he was awarded together Professor Andrzej Skowron a prize for achievements in the field of Programming Theory by the Polish Mathematical Society. In 2023 he was awarded the title of "Docente d’onore" (teacher of honor) of the University of Rome "Tor Vergata".
Research Areas Throughout his career he worked in various areas of Theoretical Computer Science including: lambda calculus, rewriting systems, concurrent programming, functional programming, categorical semantics, program transformation, verification, and synthesis of constraint logic programs. Link to my personal page: https://www.iasi.cnr.it/~apettorossi/
Nationality: Italian Alma mater: University of Rome "La Sapienza" Known for logic program transformation
Scientific career Institutions: Computer Science Department, Edinburgh, UK. Thesis: Methodologies for Transformation and Memoing in Applicative Languages (1994) Doctoral Advisor: Rod (Rodney Martineau) Burstall === --ADPettorossi (talk) 13:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Important: Please update user script installation
editHi there, you currently have a user script installed from Anne drew Andrew and Drew. Several weeks ago, I changed my username to Anne drew, and unfortunately, due to an issue with script redirects, the scripts you have installed under my old username no longer function.
To fix this, please update your JavaScript pages (Special:MyPage/common.js or Special:MyPage/skin.js) by replacing all instances of Anne drew Andrew and Drew with Anne drew.
If any of this is unclear, please ping Anne drew for help. I apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your understanding!
Thanks – Anne drew
You are receiving this message because you have installed one of Anne drew's user scripts. If you'd like to stop receiving notifications, you can unsubscribe here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Administrator Elections: Voting phase
editThe voting phase of the October 2024 administrator elections has started and continues until 23:59 31st October 2024 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Voting phase.
As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:
- October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
- November 1–? - Scrutineering phase
In the voting phase, the candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies for a vote will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RFA.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)