Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rivka Ladin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 23:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rivka Ladin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Attempts to find sources for notability in WP:BEFORE came up empty handed. Cheers! Fakescientist8000 23:41, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: also attempted WP:BEFORE and found nothing Jack4576 (talk) 11:15, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. At the very least, the article should mention the subject's current position/institution/company and major contributions to the field, and there aren't even any RS on that. --Tserton (talk) 20:56, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: I added 2 references proving she holds a patent, and published multiple papers about distributed computing. She worked for Digital Equipment Corporation and Compaq. She is (a retired) Director at Hewlett-Packard. Geertivp (talk) 10:22, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't think that the simple fact of holding a patent is anything to write home about - it depends whether the patent is widely used and whether it has been defended successfully in court. The subject has contributed to several highly cited papers, but citations in computer science are so high that I don't know whether she passes WP:PROF#C1 on their basis. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:49, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, regretfully. I am hesitant to delete any articles about Women in STEM, since there is such legion gender discrimination in those fields. That having been said, there is too little about the person readily available online to make even a decent stub. I would not oppose userfication, even if it's dumped in my user space. Bearian (talk) 14:47, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy