Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working/Manual
These are nominations that need attention and work by editors before the CfD request can be completed.
Listify
editThere are also 3 pages in Category:Categories to be listified then deleted.
Please link to the discussion, and tag the category with {{listify}}
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 August 7#Category:List of place names of Choctaw origin in the United States
- Listify then delete. Might tackle this if I can find some free time. Queen of Hearts (talk) 03:46, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Queen of Hearts: as this listification has been pending since August, I'll move forward with it. Regards --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Please do. Charlotte (Queen of Hearts • talk) 01:02, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Queen of Hearts: as this listification has been pending since August, I'll move forward with it. Regards --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 August 27#Category:Baseball players suspended for drug offenses
- * Pppery * it has begun... 22:54, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Other
editThere are also 7 pages in Category:Categories needing manual work after a discussion.
Please link to the discussion, and tag the category with {{Cfd manual}}.
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 October 29#Category:Nineveh
- Split. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:16, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 October 27#Uezds of Vitebsk Governorate
- Add links as specified at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 October 27#c-Fayenatic london-20241028214400-Uezds of Vitebsk Governorate. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 18:44, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 October 21#Category:Free compilers and interpreters
- Split Category:Free compilers and interpreters to Category:Free and open source compilers and Category:Free and open source interpreters. @Zerbu: Would you be able to implement this one? HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:26, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 October 10#Category:Film and television memes
- Purge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 21:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Just came across this randomly, but I could do this one within the next few days. However, just for clarification, because it isn't entirely clear for me from the discussion/close how strict the purge should be: It reads to me like we only keep existing articles (so excl. redirects) where the subject is a meme or memes (related to or stemming from film and television, incl. web series), which means the following would be removed: a) redirects (for specific memes or any other subject, but excl. soft redirects, e.g., to Wikiquote) and b) articles about films, tv shows or any other subject that is not a meme (regardless of whether or not a meme is associated with the subject and sourced content about a meme is in it). Have I got that right? Felida97 (talk) 23:14, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Felida97, and thank you so much for volunteering to take this one on! The closure is requesting that the category only contain articles which are defined by being memes. So redirects from specific memes to the film/movie they come from should remain in the category. What should be removed is all articles about films/TV shows/etc. which happen to have memes. If a hypothetical television show is in and of itself a meme, that would belong in the category, but I do not think there is anything in the category which meets that description. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:33, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- @HouseBlaster: Ok, no problem, sounds good! I wasn't sure about the redirects, because the nominator had said that "redirects aren't helpful either because no sources can be applied to them", and I do see their point (or at least the issue I believe they were referring to; see, e.g., Is mayonnaise an instrument?, which redirects to a section/article without any indication that this is a meme or that it comes from that TV episode), but you probably meant that the meme must be mentioned in the film/TV show article in order to keep the redirect (e.g., Baneposting), right? Felida97 (talk) 03:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- You have it exactly correct, Felida97 :) HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 19:37, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- @HouseBlaster: Ok, no problem, sounds good! I wasn't sure about the redirects, because the nominator had said that "redirects aren't helpful either because no sources can be applied to them", and I do see their point (or at least the issue I believe they were referring to; see, e.g., Is mayonnaise an instrument?, which redirects to a section/article without any indication that this is a meme or that it comes from that TV episode), but you probably meant that the meme must be mentioned in the film/TV show article in order to keep the redirect (e.g., Baneposting), right? Felida97 (talk) 03:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Felida97, and thank you so much for volunteering to take this one on! The closure is requesting that the category only contain articles which are defined by being memes. So redirects from specific memes to the film/movie they come from should remain in the category. What should be removed is all articles about films/TV shows/etc. which happen to have memes. If a hypothetical television show is in and of itself a meme, that would belong in the category, but I do not think there is anything in the category which meets that description. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:33, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Just came across this randomly, but I could do this one within the next few days. However, just for clarification, because it isn't entirely clear for me from the discussion/close how strict the purge should be: It reads to me like we only keep existing articles (so excl. redirects) where the subject is a meme or memes (related to or stemming from film and television, incl. web series), which means the following would be removed: a) redirects (for specific memes or any other subject, but excl. soft redirects, e.g., to Wikiquote) and b) articles about films, tv shows or any other subject that is not a meme (regardless of whether or not a meme is associated with the subject and sourced content about a meme is in it). Have I got that right? Felida97 (talk) 23:14, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 June 28#Category:Body horror video games
- Purge articles and categories that aren't characterized by reliable sources as the body horror genre. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 30#Category:War video games
- Purge. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:17, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Zxcvbnm: would you be willing to purge this category? See also the one further below. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:19, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Zxcvbnm: pinging one more time. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 27#Category:Fictional characters with disfigurements
- Purge. --Qwerfjkl talk 18:13, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Zxcvbnm: would you be willing to purge this category? Marcocapelle (talk) 20:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Zxcvbnm ping? Mason (talk) 02:36, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'll add that "no" is a valid answer (though it is custom for the proposer to implement the thing, because they have the vision for what should happen). HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Zxcvbnm ping? Mason (talk) 02:36, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Zxcvbnm: would you be willing to purge this category? Marcocapelle (talk) 20:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Templates removed or updated – deletion pending automatic emptying of category
editThese requests are automatically processed by the job queue. The current backlog size can be seen there. Null edits can also be used to empty these categories. Please tag these categories with Template:Cfd jobqueue to show the CFD discussion has ended.
Please link to the per-day page that has the discussion on it.
- None currently
Templates removed or updated – deletion completed but backlinks yet to be resolved
editThese requests have been processed but "what links here" on the deleted category still shows multiple links from article and category space. This may be, in part, due to links in templates for which the revised version has yet to be populated; these are automatically processed by the job queue. The current backlog size can be seen there. Null edits can alo be used to resolve these backlinks. Please do not remove entries from the list until the only remaining backlinks are from project or user space pages.
Please link to the per-day page that has the discussion on it.
- None currently