Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 December 25

December 25

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No consensus * Pppery * it has begun... 05:58, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charli XCX - Unlock It.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by GiankM. M (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I don't believe this is the actual cover art for the single. Released on 11 December 2017, the Internet Archive shows the Pop 2 artwork being used on the single on the 12th when the mixtape wasn't released until the 15th. Launchballer 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:43, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep About whether "Unlock It" doesn't have a cover is something I disagree for the following reasons:
  • It's true that in Spotify, all the singles Pop 2 show the album's cover and don't have an artwork of its own. However, Spotify it's not the only source that can determine if a single has its own cover or not.
  • The cover I uploaded comes from a post of Charli's official Tumblr account. Kim Petras also uploaded the same image to her Facebook.
  • It was designed by the same person who did the cover for "Out of My Head". From what it seems, both covers are from a series of pictures created to promote the mixtape. They follow the same style so its safe to assume that Charli hired a person to do them and its not fanmade content.
  • Regardless of whether a song doesn't have a cover on streaming platforms, other articles have used promotional images for singles.
GiankM. M (talk) 04:50, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep As I am not sure since it's been done on multiple song articles, can a picture that is promoted by the artist be used ?Because if so strong keep as Kim Petras had posted it to her Facebook years ago. If this however is not eligible for fair use on song articles then delete. Edit: Actually strong keep. It serves it's purpose, showing who the song is featuring with the main singer listed as well, not just any photo nor is it fanmade. This0k (talk) 18:23, 11 December 2024 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE. plicit 03:50, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 21:21, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete--Ymblanter (talk) 23:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosé and Evan Mock.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lililolol (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The image doesn't significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission wouldn't be detrimental to that understanding (WP:NFCC#8). Sricsi (talk) 22:18, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No consensus Looks like nobody's taken up the offer I gave on my last relist. Ah, well. With two people disagreeing with each other and no other participants then there's nothing I can do here. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:58, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indian Bank logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by VNC200 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

A low-quality fake (WP:HOAX) that is not capable of replacing the original image for encyclopedic purposes (WP:NFCC# 4, 5, 8). — Ирука13 19:58, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change your own file to proper SVG file, and upload it in the old file. It would be better. VNC200 (talk) 03:35, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You could have informed me in my own chatbox such issues. I would have tried to make such changes accordingly. Is it possible to get some time to change and modify and upload it in a new form ? Please let me know. VNC200 (talk) 03:38, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I inform the community of a conflict of interest regarding this image between me and the administrator Ymblanter. — Ирука13 13:09, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Iruka13: I don't think that's a conflict of interest as the term is used on Wikipedia. jlwoodwa (talk) 05:22, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:42, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Let's try to bring some clarity to this mess. The dispute here seems to be whether to use File:Indian_Bank_logo.svg or File:Indian_Bank_logo_2023.png as the logo for Indian Bank. The SVG has an unclear source (it claims to have been extracted from a PDF, but what specific PDF is not specified). The PNG seems to be identical to the logo that appears at the top of the website. On the other hand, it's generally agreed that vector graphics are preferable to raster graphics, all else equal. If this gets no more comments in another week, it will probably be closed as no consensus, but I'm giving people one last chance to sort this out.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 22:46, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indian_Bank_logo_2023.png is a real logo. Not because it was copied from the official website, but because it graphically matches the original logo by more than 97%. File:Indian_Bank_logo.svg is not a real logo. Not because it was not copied from the official source, but because it does not graphically match the original logo.
Please open the .svg-version in a high enough resolution and compare it with the original. Please open the list of deleted files of the editor VNC200, and/or their talk page. Please read the comment to the deleted message on the Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 November 15 page. Please reread what the author of the nominated file writes here.
We should not use low-quality images when we can use high-(or at least official)-quality ones. And we should not create precedents for doing so. — Ирука13 02:38, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy