1997, Kenji Ueno, translated by Goro Kato, Algebraic Geometry 1: From Algebraic Varieties to Schemes, American Mathematical Society, page x:
This book develops Grothendieck's scheme theory as a method for studying algebraic geometry.[…]In the preface of EGA [ Éléments de géométrie algébrique ], Grothendieck even claimed that a knowledge of classical algebraic geometry may hinder the reader from studying scheme theory.
1999, Freddy Van Oystaeyen, “A Deformation of Projective Schemes”, in Freddy Van Oystaeyen, editor, Commutative Algebra and Algebraic Geometry, Marcel Dekker, page 295:
There is another approach dealing with more ring theoretical objects, i.e. starting from a nice class of algebras, called schematic algebras, it is possible to define a space, a Zariski topology, points, lines etc..., cf. [VOW1], [AZ], [ATV]. then it becomes possible to develop a scheme theory, completely extending the theory of schemes in classical algebraic geometry.
2004, Haruzo Hida, p-Adic Automorphic Forms on Shimura Varieties, Springer, page 68:
The main point of scheme theory is to consider as a covariant functor from the category (also written as ) of -algebras into the category of sets.
(psychology) A theory of group decision-making which explains group decisions as the result of a decision scheme on the initial distribution of attitudes in the group.
1998, Douglas J. Hacker, Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, page 78:
With these ideas of scheme theory, perturbation, and abstraction, it becomes possible to see how metacognition might be interpreted in constructivist terms.