User talk:Paul venter

Aaron Swartz on Wikipedia

Even if all the formatters quit the project tomorrow, Wikipedia would still be immensely valuable. For the most part, people read Wikipedia because it has the information they need, not because it has a consistent look. It certainly wouldn’t be as nice without one, but the people who (like me) care about such things would probably step up to take the place of those who had left. The formatters aid the contributors, not the other way around.

But Wikipedia’s openness isn’t a mistake; it’s the source of its success. A dedicated community solves problems that official leaders wouldn’t even know were there. Meanwhile, their volunteerism largely eliminates infighting about who gets to be what. Instead, tasks get done by the people who genuinely want to do them, who just happen to be the people who care enough to do them right. Wikipedia’s biggest problems have come when it’s strayed from this path, when it’s given some people official titles and specified tasks. Whenever that happens, real work slows down and squabbling speeds up. But it’s an easy mistake to make, so it gets made again and again.
— Aaron Swartz Who Writes Wikipedia

Fresh start

In an effort to stave off being stalked and harassed, I have since 2006 used the sockpuppets Roxithro (talk), Raasgat (talk), Rotational (talk), Androstachys (talk) and Tekwani (talk). I am returning to my original account, renouncing all others, and hope to work in a collegiate spirit with my fellow editors. Paul venter (talk) 05:49, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Frederick Timpson I'Ons

Hello Paul venter, I just thought I'd let you know that I saw your article Frederick Timpson I'Ons in the New Articles list-- You did an excellent job uploading an image to the article.However, I think the article seems to contain a few errors: the references in the article do not follow Wikipedia guidelines. There is a tutorial on formatting citations at Wikipedia:Referencing.It would be great if you could also upload a picture for the related article Makana (prophet).

Kind regards and happy editing! Jipinghe (talk) 19:20, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Eduard Pechuël-Loesche

Hello! Your submission of Eduard Pechuël-Loesche at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Stemonitis (talk) 18:05, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MikroKopter

The article MikroKopter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of meeting notability guidelines at WP:ORG. The references given are either not independent or do not mention the company.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 12:54, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MikroKopter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MikroKopter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MikroKopter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. noq (talk) 13:37, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Lecythis zabucajo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Operculum, Fusiform and Amazon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Baron von Ludwig (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Joseph Burke

Boophone disticha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bantu

Lecythis zabucajo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to 2S

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Dierama pendulum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watsonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Curt Teichert, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Washington, Freiberg and Carnegie Foundation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Millettia laurentii, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page African Rosewood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Petrarch's De remediis utriusque fortunae

"George Bush referenced the Petrarchan form in his 2004 State of the Union Address." Really? Citation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.198.136.240 (talk) 16:34, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not my edit!! Paul venter (talk) 10:41, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Hendrik Claudius, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Trinity College and Batavia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Botanist template

Please see my reply at Template talk:Botanist#More styling issues. Thanks! Kaldari (talk) 19:21, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pelargonium punctatum00.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pelargonium punctatum00.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:57, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hieronymus Harder

Hello Paul! I've been following your edits at Binomial nomenclature. I'm hoping you are adding inline sources to support your individual points, so they can stay in the article. I was waiting until you finish your Hieronymus Harder article to make any changes (soon?), but in the Binomial article the Hieronymus info belongs in the history section (if it is sourced) instead of the lead. I'm very curious what your sources say about 1) whether he always used a binomial or only partially, and 2) how much, if any, he talked about a system of binomial nomenclature as proposed for use by everyone. Thanks for the info! --Tom Hulse (talk) 10:25, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tom, No, I don't have any sources in which Harder made notes specifically about Binomial nomenclature, but only index pages from his Herbarium vivum which clearly display his use of the idea. From the image I posted at Binomial nomenclature it should be apparent that he didn't always stick to a binomial style. "The introduction of this system of naming species is credited to Linnaeus" in the lead should certainly be balanced by a reference to earlier use of the idea by Harder and the Bauhins and others, lest a reader get the notion that Linnaeus got the idea straight from heaven rather than the tweaking of an idea that goes back much further in time! Go well Paul venter (talk) 13:53, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I sure do understand wanting to get the word out more about this great guy. His work is amazing, and I'm really enjoying the info you are adding at the other two articles, but the trouble here is that Wikipedia is about what the sources say, not about what may be true. Even if there were sources, we would still have to be careful not to give him credit for more than should apply. For instance, he did not publish a description of how to use a system of binomial nomenclature, nor is he even using a system of binomial nomenclature in his herbarium vivum, just a mix of different-sized names (although many are inividually binomials). We don't have any evidence that Linnaeus was influenced by him (we do have evidence that L. was influence by the Bauhins), nor that anyone was. Using a mixed system including binomials was not new or unique at his time, certainly less notable than the Bauhins who themselves only merit a minor mention in the History section. So I'm sorry I'll have to drastically reduce your addition to just a part of a sentence in the History section, and remove the image. They're just not that relevant to the article, I hope you understand. Best regards. --Tom Hulse (talk) 08:49, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paul I removed the unsourced material per WP:NOR & WP:RS. In the History section, the article currently says "The Bauhins... took some important steps towards the binomial system", and I would really like add info here about Hieronymus Harder, but I can't without a reliable source, so please let me know if you find anything. --Tom Hulse (talk) 09:07, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've been extremely careful about my additions and did not make any unwarranted assumptions about Harder's contribution to binomial nomenclature - I simply posted the image which clearly shows that Harder made use of the binomial idea. His early use of binomialism is extremely relevant to the article, so that I am reverting the edit and hope that a wider group of editors may become involved in the discussion before deciding that Harder is really irrelevant. cheers Paul venter (talk) 09:16, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion moved by Paul to Talk:Binomial nomenclature#Hieronymus Harder --Tom Hulse (talk) 10:15, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Robert Goldston01.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Robert Goldston01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mblumber (talk) 18:23, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Robinia pseudoacacia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Suckering (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:08, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aussenkehr Desert Extreme Trail Run

Hi,

I have nominated Aussenkehr Desert Extreme Trail Run for deletion. As you were a participant in the first AFD, you may be interested in participating in the second AFD. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 14:25, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

James Lonsdale (painter) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to George Romney, Lancastrian, Queen Caroline, Charles Turner and Lancaster

Ipomoea simplex (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Sotho and Xhosa

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Commonscat-inline2 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Commonscat-inline2. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Commonscat-inline2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MGA73 (talk) 12:58, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Charles Edward Moss (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Halifax and Transvaal

List of Johannesburg garden birds (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Grey hornbill

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dischidia major (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Follicles and Mutualism

Pannemaeker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Margaret of Austria

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. When you recently edited Streptocarpus rexii, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gloxinia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gabriel Fauré

Thank you for your passing remarks on the article talk page. I have replaced the Saint-Saëns image, and for reasons already discussed at PR am reluctant to replace the famous Sargent image at the top. But I cannot see which other two images you object to. I know that the MoS says "It is often preferable to place images of faces so that the face or eyes look toward the text. However, images of people need not be reversed simply to make the person's face point the text", but I can't find the two other images you refer to as, in your words, "happily peering away from the text". Grateful for your elucidation. Tim riley (talk) 20:36, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Immunology

I see you have edited some of the pages within the scope of immunology. Please have a look at the proposal for a WikiProject Immunology WP:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Immunology and give your opinion (support or oppose). Thank you for your attention. Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 09:41, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ernest Entwistle Cheesman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Cocoa and Musa

Ensete ventricosum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Transvaal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:52, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiThanks

In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.7.19 (talk) 15:50, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. When you recently edited Vesque Sisters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musée national des Arts et Traditions Populaires (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An award for you

Golden Wiki Award

Thanks for your recent contributions! 67.80.64.128 (talk) 01:20, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. When you recently edited Johann Christian Cuno, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buettneria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Saasveld04.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Saasveld04.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:48, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jean Ruel

Hi there, I just wanted to thank you for the creation of the Jean Ruel (a very interesting man) article in the English wikipedia. I have some personal bibliography on him so I will edit it in some days ok? Maybe I can contribute. There is also a Spanish and a French article of Jean Ruel I think, they should be associated. We talk in some days.--Schuylkill52 (talk) 10:38, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Download sites

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. West Eddy (talk) 07:11, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: "Download sites"

Hi Paul. Thanks for your note regarding your article "Download sites". I took a look at it and as it was, I agree the deletion was appropriate. However, I can see that it could be useful to have a page listing relevant databases, sites, journals etc, so I have restored it and moved into your userspace here: User:Paul venter/Download sites. I don't recommend re-posting it into the article space as it will most likely be deleted again, but you can keep it in your userspace. You could also talk to the botany wikiproject about making it into a resources subpage of the wikiproject or possibly even writing a subject area database list, such as: List of biodiversity databases, List of neuroscience databases, List of online databases and List of academic databases and search engines. Unfortunately I don't know enough about botany or these websites to know if developing your page into such a list would be appropriate or not so I cannot advise you either way but it's just an idea that you might consider discussing with other editors more knowledgeable about this area and these databases. I noticed that someone has also started collection some links to botanical databases and catalogs here: Outline_of_botany#External_links. Also, in future, if you are starting a new article which you haven't finished and are still actively working on, you would be best to start the article in a sub-page of your userspace (for example, User:Paul venter/Drafts). We give people a lot of leeway with userspace drafts so you would generally be free to work on it in your own time and without having to worry about people interfering with it or nominating it for speedy deletion before you have even finished. Then once you have finished working on it, simply move the page to the main article space. Hope this helps. Cheers, Sarah 06:48, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS Just FYI, I found the name "Download sites" confusing and it really didn't seem to be an appropriate name for an article. Please see the policy on article titles for more information about article titles, but I would suggest that an article listing botanical databases be named something like "List of botany databases". Sarah 06:48, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Adam de Colone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to James III, Charles I and Queen Margaret of Denmark

William Oliphant Hutchison (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kinloch

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:57, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Julius Detmold

Just wanted to drop by to say thanks for all your work on Edward Julius Detmold, which I read with fascination. I made a few minor changes (mostly cosmetic) to the article, which I hope don't offend – do feel free to revert any of them if you prefer. I've also added Authority Control links and Persondata. Thanks again – it's so pleasing to read such a well-written article. — Hebrides (talk) 11:36, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

Hi. When you recently edited Edward Barton Shuldham, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Trinity College and MA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

Hi. When you recently edited Henry Detmold, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St Ives (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sophie Darlington

Hi, just letting you know i removed the {{in use}} tag from your Sophie Darlington article, as it hasn't been edited since 3 August. These tags are only supposed to remain for only a few hours. Maybe add an {{under construction}} tag if you are still going to edit it more. Thanks --Mjs1991 (talk) 03:19, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. When you recently edited Acacia ataxacantha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transvaal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Acacia caffra, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bantu and Transvaal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beer Stein Marker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bavarian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:40, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Van Riebeeck Society, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Africana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Gauteng birds, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Common Stonechat and Black Crow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Gauteng birds, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Purple Gallinule and Wood Owl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commiphora africana

Why did you remove the taxobox here? jonkerz ♠talk 05:29, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did I? I was busy editing the article and must have inadvertently overwritten your contribution. Why did you ignore the "in use" template? Paul venter (talk) 05:33, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, just an edit conflict. The page was last edited 10 hours before I added the taxobox. jonkerz ♠talk 05:38, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Buckland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Islip (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gonometa postica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to San and Bantu

Fibroin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Samia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:19, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Latin place names used as specific names, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Abyssinia, Northern and Schönbrunn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Claës Fredrik Hornstedt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandarin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Jean Giono00.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jean Giono00.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WB Macdougall

Paul

Thanks for creating the William Brown Macdougall Wiki page. Incidentally, Macdougall has no capital 'D" in his name, although the information you have provided is otherwise quite accurate. I wondered where you sourced it from as some of it is not widely documented ?

We have more information regarding WBM if you are interested in adding it. Alternatively, we could add it ourselves although not exactly familiar with how to go about it.

Kind regards G. Jones — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.24.160 (talk) 15:52, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi G Jones, Thank you for your note. Additional material would always be welcome. If you are uncertain of how to go about it you can paste text on this page. For images you would need to create a blog of your own and post the URL on this page, otherwise you would need to email me at paulvent@gmail.com regards, Paul Venter Paul venter (talk) 18:10, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ignaz von Szyszyłowicz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Diospyros crassiflora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oliver Dennett Grover, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Banff (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:34, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexander Marshal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Royal Library (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Four glasses puzzle

See Talk:Four glasses puzzle#Hiding the solution. Gandalf61 (talk) 10:41, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Frederick Schoenfeld, Paul venter!

Wikipedia editor Modern.Jewelry.Historian just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice article!

To reply, leave a comment on Modern.Jewelry.Historian's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Metalasia muricata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fascicled (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Talk:Four glasses puzzle#Hiding the solution

Hello, Paul venter. You have new messages at Talk:Four glasses puzzle.
Message added 19:28, 14 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Requested autopatrolled

I requested the autopatrolled permission for your account. VQuakr (talk) 08:50, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kindness! Paul venter (talk) 08:55, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol granted

Hi Paul venter, just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled right to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Mifter (talk) 22:41, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SummerPhD#blocked_editor Paul venter (talk) 13:44, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Spaces in botanical author abbreviations

I initially wrote more-or-less what you changed the template to say, but it's not correct. Search [1] for the surname "van Wyk" for example. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:38, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Too true - I must have suffered from a mental aberration (momentary I hope). Thanks for picking it up! I notice the author abbreviations are not consistent in their treatment of, for example, "de Winter' and "de Wit", using "De" and "de" in the abbreviations. Is there a reason other than "oops"? Paul venter (talk) 10:38, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bernard de Winter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Okavango (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Crematogaster peringueyi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Honeydew

Manuel de Mesquita Perestrelo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to São Bento

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

C. P. Lounsbury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Transvaal

MikroKopter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Traffic control

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Keith Joubert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Linyanti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cape Gannet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sula (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Cor Dirks00.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Cor Dirks00.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 09:29, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cor Dirks00.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Cor Dirks00.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:23, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hermann Merxmüller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alpine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of No Original Research Noticeboard discussion

Hello, Paul venter. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Calappa calappa. Thank you. Rkitko ^(talk) 06:15, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Calappa calappa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Abrolhos Islands

Cape Pioneer Trek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to George

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:42, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Hi Paul, Thanks for your contributions to articles on Joseph Storr Lister, Comte Médéric de Vasselot de Régné and others! Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 17:31, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why hello David! Most kind of you to notice and comment - your interest in matters forestry is quite unusual. Mine stems from having worked for 5 years for forestry when I was young. Regards Paul venter (talk) 22:23, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're most welcome, Paul. I teach at a forestry school and, while I'm not a forester, am interested in forest(ry) policy and history. I was impressed by South Africa's extensive Pinus radiata plantations when I visited several years ago (did not get to the Cape, though)... Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 01:42, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I notification

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Rkitko ^(talk) 00:43, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, of course. This is all dreadfully familiar - your drumming up support from your acolytes, branding your prejudice as consensual and just generally carrying on with your stock-in-trade bullying. When will you ever learn to step back along with your self-satisfied interpretation of the MoS, and leave the constant nit-picking to others? Paul venter (talk) 06:12, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions!

	WikiProject Forestry
	Thank you on behalf of WikiProject Forestry! We appreciate your contribution(s) and invite you to join us in further improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to forestry. Feel free to ask questions or make suggestions on the project's talk page.

Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 21:59, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sandfall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sandfall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandfall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pburka (talk) 03:30, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Millwood, South Africa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:14, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mass wasting - cautions

Please use caution and read WP:RS and WP:Copyvio. In your recent edits to mass wasting here you (inadvertently) left a fragment copied from the source you were using. It was removed by another user, and although obviously an error, it was simply a violation of copyright and we must be very careful about such things. Secondly the source you used, some professor's "lecture notes", fails our referencing requirements. We must use material published in a reliable source. I am well aware that back 7 or 8 years ago WP was much more lax on this and much unreferenced and poorly referenced content remains. Back then "content was king", but now Wikipedia has tighter standards - and "lecture notes" simply are not reliable sources. Please study the guideline pages linked above and use caution. Vsmith (talk) 11:08, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If I inadvertently left that fragment, why am I getting this entirely gratuitous sermon about stuff I already know? Paul venter (talk) 14:05, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fairy circle (Africa)

I was just wondering if you had a more specific source for the information you added to the article fairy circle (Africa), as in the title of the actual paper that references the information added. Angryapathy (talk) 13:51, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Helena Scott

Hi Paul Venter, Before I saw your article on Helena Scott I created an entry on Helena and Harriet Scott. Now there are two similar articles which I think should be one article as they are always referred to together as the Scott sisters. This is why I entitled my version Helena and Harriet Scott. I therefore suggest we move the content you created along with the images and categories into the article with the jointly named title. Do you think this is a good solution? Elara7 (talk) 04:00, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Elara, My first reaction would be to leave both articles as is with a 'See also' note and/or piping in the lead paragraph. Some rabid editor is bound to object in order to do some grandstanding, but I can see no compelling reason to merge the articles. The other way to go may be to do a separate article on Harriet Scott, something which shouldn't be too difficult as the groundwork has already been done. Anyway, whatever we decide is bound to be set aside by a bunch of editors who would claim to know better and also claim to have consensus, so that in the end it doesn't matter. Cheers Paul venter (talk) 06:51, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paul venter, Thanks for your suggestion. I will go ahead and do a separate article on Harriet, which as you said should be easier than merging the two articles. Thanks Elara7 (talk) 23:15, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hazell, Watson and Viney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Temperance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A. Cutler & Son, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clinton, New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:31, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review request

Hi Paul, I've initiated a peer review request for the List of historic schools of forestry article, and would appreciate your input on ways that it can be improved. Ultimately, I would like to nominate it for Featured List status. Please add any comments or suggestions at this link. Thank you & Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 13:53, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David, Useful list indeed. After a cursory inspection (I'll return later) the only change I made was lifting the size restriction on the image of Heinrich von Cotta. Regards Paul venter (talk) 14:20, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Paul. I look forward to learning of any further suggestions for improving the list that you might have. Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 10:08, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Rita Miljo02.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:Rita Miljo02.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:20, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MEDRS

Discussion transferred to Stroke talk page Paul venter (talk) 08:22, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request for help regarding a block

(see discussion here) (Criteria for speedy deletion#G5)

As i have explained at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard, I deleted Ecolon on the basis of a block log entry for Androstachys, referring to you as a "community-banned long-term disruptive editor". However, I see no evidence that this is correct. Can you clarify the circumstances that led to the Androstachys account being blocked? If you can, I will consider changing the block log, to prevent the same sort of mistake being made again. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:03, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the offer. The Androstachys account was blocked by Hesperian as a result of long-standing friction with him and Rkitko over interpretations of the MoS and consequent edit-warring. For the exact sequence of events one would have to inspect the history log of Androstachys. Also relevant was the removal by Hesperian to mainspace of about a dozen articles which had been developed by Rotational in his user space (for the history of one such article see here). Paul venter (talk) 14:53, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is also relevant. Paul venter (talk) 15:00, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that information. On the face of it, it seems that the block log entry made by Hesperian is way out of line. However, I have asked Hesperian to comment, and am willing to wait a little while to see if he/she makes any response. Feel free to contact me about this if I don't get back on this within a couple of days, if you wish to. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:33, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hesperian is still, it seems, of the opinion that you were community banned, but since nobody has produced a record of when or where this happened, I don't know whether it is true or not. However, it is evident that you created the article while evading at least one block, and whether the block was based on a ban or not is of little relevance, as the deletion reason "Creation by a banned or blocked user" is still valid. The undeletion of the article took place because the deletion was believed to have been made on the basis of a false impression, but it is now clear that that was not the case. On a different but related issue, your request for undeletion says "Previous nominations of other articles created by user Androstachys were dismissed since the articles were found to be useful, and that being banned or blocked did not automatically mean that work prior to the ban was without merit". However, the policy that pages created by editors evading blocks can be deleted does not depend on lack of "merit" of those pages. It is true that there are some administrators who choose to ignore this particular policy, because they personally disagree with it. My own belief, however, is that the job of an administrator is to administer policy, not to use one's administrative powers to further one's own personal view. No administrator is ever obliged to take action that he or she doesn't personally agree with, but undoing an existing action because of one's own view, even though that view is contrary to policy, is, in my opinion, unacceptable, and so requesting undeletion on such grounds is invalid. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:22, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Robert Soderstrom

Hello, Paul venter, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Thomas Robert Soderstrom, appears to be directly copied from http://pt.encydia.com/es/Thomas_Robert_Soderstrom. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Thomas Robert Soderstrom if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 16:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Eucallipterus tiliae may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:49, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Real big brother watching! Paul venter (talk) 11:01, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jewellery may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

wide variety of sophisticated metalworking techniques, such as [[cloisonné]], [[engraving]], fine {{Granulation (jewellery)|granulation]], and [[filigree]].<ref>Nemet-Nejat, ''Daily Life'', 295–297.</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:17, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Allium may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of the number of species have been as low as 260,<ref name="rahn1998"/> and as high as 979. <ref>[http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/search?q=Allium "Kew Checklist of Plants"</ref> The [[type species]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:31, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Thomas Pearson Stokoe00.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Thomas Pearson Stokoe00.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:07, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that James is busy with some sort of crusade - I believe to the detriment of WP - and has also deleted Thomas Pearson Stokoe, Johannes Schumacher and Getaway (magazine). Deletions of this sort have come up before here and here. In my opinion the G5 policy is not so much punitive to the erring editor, but rather shoots WP in both feet. The G5 policy should be reviewed to align with WP's oft-stated goal of doing that which is in the best interest of the Encyclopaedia. Paul venter (talk) 19:32, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henry Bishop Horton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Melodeon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Granulation (jewellery), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sumeria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nudaurelia cytherea capensis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watsonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:15, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Saturniidae may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

], examples being the Mopane Worm (''[[Gonimbrasia belina]]''), the Cabbage Tree Emperor Moth (''[[Bunaea alcinoe]]'' and the Pallid Emperor Moth (''[[Cirina forda]]''). <ref>[http://www.fao.org/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:25, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to William Alexander Stables may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

factor or property manager of [[John Campbell, 2nd Earl Cawdor]]. Later Stables became a banker at [[Nairn]<ref>http://www.thepeerage.com/p30526.htm</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:02, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Brian Kesinger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Walt Disney Studios

Protos of Nonnendamm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Le Matin

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Alexander Stables, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madras Cavalry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:09, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello, I'm AndrewDressel. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! -AndrewDressel (talk) 12:43, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cer-Vit

Hi Paul venter. In the Cer-Vit article, as created by Androstachys, which i understand was your account, you have written that it was made by "Owens-Illinois Corning", which is not clear. Was it made by Owens-Illinois and Corning Inc., two separate companies, or by Owens Corning, an offshoot of them both? I'm merely asking so i can send the wlink(s) to the right place (currently the Corning one goes to a disambiguation page). Thanks for your help. Cheers, Lindsay^Hello 13:49, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know how to respond to this

repeated invocation of my name: "I first touched on it some while back when I pointed out to Sminthopsis84". It sounds as if you are criticizing me for not understanding everything that it is your mind, and, frankly, I find that unpleasant. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 22:22, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peter coxhead wrote I'm baffled by your phrase "the plant". What plant? I and Sminthopsis84 have spent time trying to explain that "nettle" doesn't refer to one plant, so how can the primary meaning be "the plant"?. I found this surprising in view of the fact that I had commented to you at the very outset that the article was taking a very narrow view of 'nettle' if it didn't include all the other plants so named across the English-speaking world.. Please do not introduce inflammatory rhetoric where there was none before and also confine this sort of comment to the article's talk page. Paul venter (talk) 22:55, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe that this sort of thing belongs on the article talk page. Clearly, you and I are unable to communicate. What you've just said about "the plant" and a much earlier discussion when the page was about the genus Urtica still makes no sense to me, but I don't care to engage with someone who uses phrases like inflammatory rhetoric. However, please stop abusing me on the article talk page. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 23:02, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the average person would regard my comments as abuse - or abstruse. Paul venter (talk) 23:06, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frederik van Zyl Slabbert00.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Frederik van Zyl Slabbert00.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:45, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gazania krebsiana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bantu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Nudaurelia cytherea capensis00.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nudaurelia cytherea capensis00.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:08, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nudaurelia cytherea capensis00.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Nudaurelia cytherea capensis00.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:01, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arthur Stanley Hirst, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hackney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mange may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of follicular mange, which is due to a bacterium [[Staphylococcus epidermidis]] or some allied form). The mite plays an important part in the disease, however, by preparing the ground for the

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:25, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:SolarReserve00.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:SolarReserve00.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 13:49, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Intikon00.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Intikon00.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 13:50, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Kensani00.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Kensani00.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 13:50, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jean-Henri Marlet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Restoration (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Retief, de Ville & Co. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Abyssinia

Thomas W. Naylor Beckett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Canterbury Museum

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

''Cephalotaxus harringtonii redirects to Cephalotaxus harringtonia which is an incorrect name - see http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/kew-2709751 The correct name is Cephalotaxus harringtonii Paul venter (talk) 15:50, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done JamesBWatson (talk) 19:39, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you....Paul venter (talk) 20:20, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Charles de Worms

Hello. Thank you for creating Charles de Worms. Could you please add references/citations for the page however? Please reply on my talkpage. I am working on his immediate ancestors btw. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 23:07, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You added none. I add one a few hours ago. I wonder where you found all this info you added to create the page?Zigzig20s (talk) 06:40, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No idea, but a quick search turns up http://books.google.co.za/books?id=cAUTW-ax-SgC&pg=PA226&lpg=PA226&dq=Charles+de+Worms&source=bl&ots=S0f--_zwVA&sig=NcNna5DDwZuHtEwutQoIH7ad9Yk&hl=en&sa=X&ei=t1hSUs_xDLSb0AWPlIDwCA&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAQ and http://books.google.co.za/books?id=cAUTW-ax-SgC&pg=PA226&lpg=PA226&dq=Charles+de+Worms&source=bl&ots=S0f--_zwVA&sig=NcNna5DDwZuHtEwutQoIH7ad9Yk&hl=en&sa=X&ei=t1hSUs_xDLSb0AWPlIDwCA&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Charles%20de%20Worms&f=false Paul venter (talk) 06:51, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In use vs Under construction

Hi. Just to make sure we are on the same page. {{Under construction}} differs from {{in use}}. Since page stayed "in use" for 24 hours I thought something might have gone wrong. Happy editing. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:23, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quite right! It was the "In use" tag which was in place..... Paul venter (talk) 07:37, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"In use" tag is used in case you want to open the editor and you need something like 1 hour to complete editing. If you need more please use your sandbox and place the "under construction" tag. -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:51, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elisabeth Sonrel, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sceaux and Exposition Universelle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accidental reversion

Sorry - think I fixed it but I undid an edit of yours by mistake - had a bad minute of clicking on the wrong link. ◊ Antiqueight ^confer 12:15, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jacques-Philippe Cornut, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry IV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to João de Loureiro may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[File:Homalium cochinchinensis00.jpg|thumb|<center>''Homalium cochinchinensis'' (Lour.) Druce [

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:11, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Spirostachys africana

Dear Paul venter, you created the article Spirostachys africana in the english version from wikipedia. I worte the german article and i´m searching for a picture with a overall view of Spirostachys africana for my article. You upload the earliest Pictures in Commons. Do you maybe have a overall view-picture? Greetings, --M. Krafft (talk) 07:59, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - but it involves some searching through slides - so be patient Paul venter (talk) 04:43, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your work! I hope you´ll find a picture... --M. Krafft (talk) 19:11, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning! I saw your (maybe new) pictures in the en-Wiki. I put it to Commons, so that i can use it too. Do you´ve found any overall-view-picture from Spirostachys africana? Greetings, --M. Krafft (talk) 08:33, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I found a picture in the Internet an i think it´s yours. Maybe you can upload this with a CC-license? Greetings, --M. Krafft (talk) 10:23, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, not mine. Still on holiday for 2 weeks - till then Paul venter (talk) 14:05, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Paul, maybe you´ll find time for searching a photo. I searched in the whole Internet but can´t find a free-licensed picture, so you´re my only chance. In the next days i want to candidate for a good article-award and i think without a picture this will be very hard... Best wishes, --M. Krafft (talk) 17:13, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles Edward Legat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transvaal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Psychotria capensis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Northern Province (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Psychotria capensis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Priscomyzon riniensis

Hello Paul, I hope you don't mind, but because this new article had not been edited in the last 4 hours, I changed the template at the top. I also slapped in a bunch of headings, but please feel free to change them any way you want to. Best wishes, Invertzoo (talk) 22:02, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Today I removed the template, but again, feel free to add it back in if youo are going to do a bunch more work on the article. Best wishes to you, Invertzoo (talk) 02:37, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Photos and provenance

Paul, I've been looking at the photos you've uploaded, and several years ago, you uploaded multiple photos as "GFDL - own work" which clearly are not (for instance, File:Sydney Skaife.jpg). Could you go through these and add proper Nonfree - Fair Use notices instead? Thanks. DS (talk) 22:41, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder! You said you'd get to this after the Christmas break? DS (talk) 14:07, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder! Fixed. You wrote 'multiple photos as own work' - could you list a few?.... the Sydney Skaife image came from the South African Museum, Cape Town after I'd requested a photo in the public domain to use on WP - I never tagged it as my own work!! cheers Paul venter (talk) 15:12, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eupatorium macrocephalum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pappus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Please see WP:RS. There is no requirement for a reliable source to be available online; books are fine as sources. Peter coxhead (talk) 18:38, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it SHOULD be a requirement when challenged, lest enormous inaccuracies be perpetuated without the possibility of being reviewed. Paul venter (talk) 07:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maerua cafra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pax (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tentamen

Hallo, in this edit you over-wrote a long-standing and helpful redirect (from alternate spelling of "Tentamun") and replaced it with an unsourced dictionary definition. I've reverted. If you have sourced information for something beyond a dictionary definition, then create an article but make a hatnote to replace the current redirect (or make a dab page to offer the two meanings), rather than losing that navigational assistance. Thanks. PamD 00:31, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Please note that, per WP:BRD, if you make a change to a longstanding title, redirect, or other facet of an article, and that change is reverted, you must discuss the matter and achieve a consensus before attempting to implement the change again. Cheers! bd2412 T 16:10, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from talk page of BD2412

Thank you for your note on my talk page refreshing my memory about edit-warring. I notice that you did not warn the other party PamD - was that deliberate or inadvertent? cheers Paul venter (talk) 21:04, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That was deliberate. Your initial bold edit was proper; PamD's initial revert was proper; undoing the reversion without discussion was improper, and required a response. bd2412 T 23:27, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PamD's initial revert may have been proper, but it was followed by 2 more reverts on the 24th - were they also proper and not falling within the meaning of edit warring? I think if one uses a system one should try to be even-handed.....Paul venter (talk) 15:40, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think that even-handedness requires ignoring clearly differing degrees of impropriety. bd2412 T 15:43, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Really? This is from your post on my page

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

I do not see your "clearly differing degrees of impropriety" but rather a clear case of prejudice. Paul venter (talk) 16:09, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have explained above that your first move was proper, that PamD's first revert was proper, and that your following move was improper. You appear to have accepted that this was a correct judgment, so no further examination of the question is required. Cheers! bd2412 T 16:24, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what gives you the impression that I have accepted your action as the "correct judgement"!!?? You obviously are not giving my notes close attention. I ask again "Why do you regard PamD's reverts after my 'improper' revert as being acceptable? Paul venter (talk) 19:13, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Let me ask you plainly, then. Do you agree that it was wrong for you to revert PamD? bd2412 T 19:25, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No! I do not think it was wrong. Her note read "revert to long-established redirect, instead of unsourced dicdef" As I pointed out to her a 'long-established redirect' was of itself not a compelling reason for her to revert. As regards 'unsourced dicdef', I provided sources with my next edit. Paul venter (talk) 06:50, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You then created a page tagged as a disambiguation page, but which violates numerous aspects of MOS:DAB, including the express prohibition on external links appearing on disambiguation pages, and failing to actually disambiguate between ambiguously titled entries in the encyclopedia. Your actions in this regard were ultimately reverted by another administrator. Please do not create disambiguation pages unless and until there are multiple articles in Wikipedia that share an ambiguous title, or at least mention the topics by the name or term proposed to be ambiguous. bd2412 T 13:25, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your gratuitous lecture is noted, but you have consistently failed to explain your bias in issuing edit-warring tags. Paul venter (talk) 15:03, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I had explained things, but to be clear, yours was the first improper act, and the impropriety of your conduct grew worse with each successive edit. No other editor in this dispute was seeking to impose a page containing materials prohibited by MOS:DAB (which I encourage you to review if you intend to continue editing disambiguation pages), which any editor could and should therefore have immediately removed from the page. bd2412 T 15:15, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)I don't remember why I'm a talk page stalker of BD2412...but I am. Get over it Paul. You made a bad edit and then edit warred over it. Did someone else edit war? Yes....but they were right. Get over it. I make mistakes here, and I am happy when people correct me. I want the wiki to be accurate. --Onorem (talk) 15:18, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The edit-warring tag is intended for editors who are edit-warring - it doesn't ask who was right and who was wrong. Read this post with more care so that you can understand my concern, instead of rushing off half-cocked. Paul venter (talk) 09:55, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, interesting: I've just seen all the above for the first time, as Paul's talkpage is on my watchlist. I'd actually disagree with your (BD2412)'s statement above that "[Paul's] initial bold edit was proper": he over-wrote an existing redirect without supplying any replacement (such as a hatnote) for the reader looking for the Egyptian name. That was improper, and the reason that having initially PRODded the unsourced dicdef I instead reverted to the pre-existing redirect. PamD 12:28, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Proper in the sense that it wasn't straight-up vandalism. It could, in theory, have been a first step towards building a sourced and cited article on the topic. It turns out that it wasn't, but the edit by itself was merely poor editorial judgment, as opposed to something sinister. In any case, I do not think that there is any value to be gained by continuing this discussion. If anyone has anything further to say, please take it to WP:ANI. Cheers! bd2412 T 13:50, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Edit-warring is edit-warring, and if you're going to slap edit-warring tags on editors, then do so on ALL the parties involved - don't try to prejudge the situation by deciding who was right or wrong, or what was proper and improper - in this case your judgement was poor. Paul venter (talk) 08:16, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Provenance

Hm, could've sworn that there were more with incomplete or obviously bad metadata. That said, I'll accept that you might have been present to photograph Rosa Hope in the 60s/early 70s, or Judith Mason in 1980. But some of the pictures of Cuan and Phyllis McCarthy seem to be from the 20s/30s. DS (talk) 15:43, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Phyllis McCarthy was my mother-in-law while Cuan was her son - Phyllis was a painting companion of Rosa Hope and took the photo of her painting in the Drakensberg. The article on Phyllis states quite clearly "She established the Glenaholm Kennels in 1949" which was when she started breeding Ridgebacks, while Cuan was only born in 1929 - I have no idea which photos you presume to date from the "20s/30s". Paul venter (talk) 15:57, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll accept that these are family photos. (Also, I got the names and timeline bungled - Phyllis and Victor are one generation, Cuan and Gillian are a different generation! Good thing I got that sorted out before I renamed any files!) However, you weren't quite paying attention to what "own work" meant, back in '07 when you uploaded these. "Own work" specifically means that you were the one holding the camera — which you weren't. For the photos where you have no idea who the photographer was, you can get away with "family photo -- as a representative of the McCarthy estate by virtue of having married into it, I release the rights to this photo under <license>"; for the ones where you do know who the photographer was (e.g., the picture of Rosa, painting... the photo is by Phyllis McCarthy, and so she owned the copyright, which will not expire until either 50 years after she took the photo (1970ish?, so 2020ish) or 50 years after her death (1986, so 2036). But, as a representative of the McCarthy estate etc etc etc. So if you could fix those details for the McCarthy family pictures, that'd be really helpful. Thanks. DS (talk) 16:48, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

However, you weren't quite paying attention to what "own work" meant, back in '07 when you uploaded these. "Own work" specifically means that you were the one holding the camera — which you weren't. - Which images specifically are you referring to when you say I tagged them as "own work"? Paul venter (talk) 19:06, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cuan McCarthy02.jpg, File:Phyllis McCarthy05.jpg, File:Rosa Hope00.JPG, file:Phyllis McCarthy02.jpg, file:Cuan and Gillian McCarthy (1954).jpg, and file:Phyllis McCarthy00.jpg. DS (talk) 20:07, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cuan McCarthy02.jpg "Own image of Cuan McCarthy during his Cambridge University years" - This image, taken c1952 by Cuan's friend and under South African PD, was given to me by Cuan McCarthy who also owned the copyright.
File:Phyllis McCarthy05.jpg "Own photo showing McCarthy Twins with Rhodesian Ridgeback champion Glenaholm Dido and Glenaholm Cleopatra (1950)" - This image, taken c1950 by Phyllis McCarthy, was given to me by her; she also owned the copyright.
File:Rosa Hope00.JPG "Own image of Rosa Hope painting in Natal Drakensberg, South Africa" - Taken in 1950s and discussed previously.

etc. These photos, with their copyright, were left to me by Phyllis and Cuan McCarthy and it is in that sense that they were owned by me and labelled "own image" or "own photo" - in none of the descriptions did I claim to be the author or label them as "own work". Paul venter (talk) 06:36, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Paul, DS asked me to take a look at this. After looking at it, I think you're right; I would interpret "own image" as saying that you hold the copyright, not that it's necessarily your work. However, it might be easiest, if you're willing, to add a brief explanatory note to the ones that aren't your own work, saying that you inherited the copyright. It's up to you, though; I think you're all right regardless. Thanks, Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 03:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Writ Keeper, thanks for the suggestion - have re-labelled the photos accordingly. cheers Paul venter (talk) 09:43, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Statistics

Page history

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Gossweiler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catete (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Urera trinervis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cyme (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

William Felton (coachmaker)

Hi, I wonder if you might know whether or not there was any connection between this William Felton and a Colonel Arthur Felton Mulliner, coach builder and part of a coach making etc dynasty see Arthur Mulliner. I've accumulated quite a bit of bumpf about the Mulliner family and they had a habit of marrying into other coachbuilding families - I suppose because of the practice of sending each other's sons for apprenticeship to someone of at least equal standing. Anyway do you know much of William Felton's family? Regards, Eddaido (talk) 21:50, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Sorry, no I don't. I would suggest you start with a Google search including the 2 terms "William Felton" and "Colonel Arthur Felton Mulliner". Cheers Paul venter (talk) 06:46, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pearl body, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Piper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Sydney Skaife.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sydney Skaife.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:54, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sydney Skaife00.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Sydney Skaife00.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 19:53, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

By the time I saw this message the image had already been deleted. This is an idiotic process which allows the uploader no time to object to the deletion and does not take into account global time differences. If you're going to use this tag make sure that it means what it says...Paul venter (talk) 10:13, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cistus may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

sources state that under dry, hot conditions these species may be capable of self-ignition. <ref>[https://openlibrary.org/books/ia:cistusfuelmoistu159olse/Cistus_fuel_moisture_and_flammability "

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rising Star Cave

Dear Paul,

I see you started the Rising Star Cave page and thank you for that. There are however a number of errors as well as speculation that is not factual nor supported and much of which is wrong (as you will see from my profile, I am in some position to weigh in on this matter. I have tried to change some of the inaccuracies and the keep re-occurring perhaps because you are an editor? I don't know, but I would appreciate assistance in getting the factual content correct.

For example:

"who, as part of an organised search commissioned of geologist Pedro Boshoff" in fact Pedro works for me (and was under my employ) and I commissioned the exploration with him as lead caver.

"for the exploration" should read "for the expedition" - we already had funds for the exploration from national geographic, the expedition was funded separately

"which commenced on 10 November" the expedition began on 7 November

Paul, thank you for your comments on my personal page. Please address the issues that you do not have issue with for which you are responsible. Rather than go into a tit for tat discussion, I believe we should call for a more senior editor to deal with our issues. Do you agree? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Profberger (talk • contribs) 17:16, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

this entire sentence "The large number of individuals found in a tiny underground chamber, though, invites speculation on the cause. The difficulty of access as well as apparent early age of the site would seem to rule out formal burial; the only possibilities remaining are transport by water from another location, or an attempted escape from a catastrophic surface event. Interestingly, the Tswaing crater, some 200,000 years old, lies only 70km distant." is entirely speculative, unsupported and in fact most probably wrong The first sentence is ok, because it does invite speculation of course, but to speculate in the absence of evidence does not support the encyclopedic nature of the wiki.

"The cave system has been previously visited by recreational cavers, though not the fossil chamber. " we have not said the latter part of this sentence and it is unsupported.

" Lee Berger noted on Facebook that he assembled a skeleton from UW-102 materials.[6]" I perhaps think your using a facebook posting to leap to assembling what is implied as a whole skeleton is perhaps a bit much don't you think?

I would very much appreciate your assistance in correcting these factual errors as soon as possible. I have tried and they keep bouncing back so your assistance as an editor and creator would be greatly appreciated.

Profberger (talk) 12:21, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from Lee Berger's talk page:
Dear Lee, Thank you for your notes on the cave. The first thing I should bring to your attention is that I am an editor of the article, but not the only editor. Wikipedia frowns on ownership of articles.

The inclusion of Pedro Boshoff was done by an editor called Paleo Bonegirl.
"Lee Berger noted on Facebook that he assembled a skeleton from UW-102 materials.[6]" I perhaps think your using a facebook posting to leap to assembling what is implied as a whole skeleton is perhaps a bit much don't you think? I do indeed think it's a bit much, but if you examine the history of the page you will find that it was editor 68.97.5.247 who added the piece - perhaps it might be a good idea to address him/her with your concern. Did you, in fact, post such a statement on Facebook?
"The large number of individuals found in a tiny underground chamber, though, invites speculation on the cause. The difficulty of access as well as apparent early age of the site would seem to rule out formal burial; the only possibilities remaining are transport by water from another location, or an attempted escape from a catastrophic surface event. Interestingly, the Tswaing crater, some 200,000 years old, lies only 70km distant." The process by which the remains ended up in the chamber is indeed speculative. The sentence on the Tswaing crater has, as is noted, been added for interest - it is up to the reader to make a connection if he so desires.
The lack of information forthcoming, though, is not speculative, but very real, and if you would like to add any data to the article, it would be most appreciated. Paul venter (talk) 13:26, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In response to the new note you posted on my page, I should point out that after your first note I amended the issues which you raised and which I did not consider problematic. Paul venter (talk) 17:30, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Southern African indigenous trees and woody lianes may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* ''[[Milicia excelsa (Welw.) C.C.Berg (''Chlorophora excelsa'' (Welw.) Benth.)
* ''[[Xeroderris stuhlmannii]]'' (Taub.) Mendonça & E.P. Sousa (''Ostryoderris stuhlmannii'' (Taub.) Dunn ex Harms

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:19, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Southern African indigenous trees and woody lianes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* ''[[Cassine peragua]]'' subsp. ''barbata'' (L.) R.H.Archer)(''Cassine barbara'' L.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:41, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Searsia pyroides, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Searsia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Southern African indigenous trees and woody lianes may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* ''[[Grewia damine Gaertn. (''Grewia bicolor'' Juss.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:43, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Story (botanist)

Whoops, editing quickly I missed your "in use" notice. Apologies! Peter coxhead (talk) 09:09, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem....Paul venter (talk) 09:48, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Your addition to Calappa calappa has been removed or altered, as it appears to closely paraphrase a copyrighted source. Limited close paraphrasing or quotation is appropriate within reason, so long as the material is clearly attributed in the text. However, longer paraphrases which are not attributed to their source may constitute copyright violation or plagiarism, and are not acceptable on Wikipedia. Such content cannot be hosted here for legal reasons; please do not upload it. You may use external websites or printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If you own the copyright to the text, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the copyright but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. --Rkitko ^(talk) 11:23, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Try telling me things in your own words instead of just copypasting paragraphs from the MoS - stuff I already know. The degree of similarity between my source and my contribution to the article, calls for some degree of judgement, a quality in which you have shown yourself to be lacking. Your propensity for issuing threats, on the other hand, has not diminished with the passing of years.Paul venter (talk) 13:07, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Paul, the message above is generated by {{uw-paraphrase}} and is not a threat. The following is an analysis of your contribution on this edit (parts in bold are exact):

Original source: And some predators have evolved structures that are specifically designed to deal with the more common dextral snails - they have essentially become right-handed. ... Here, one of the claws is enlarged and operates with a scissor-like action that facilitates peeling open the snail.

Your text: Calappa species have evolved claws shaped to deal with common dextral snails - they have essentially become right-handed. One of the claws is enlarged and functions with a scissor-like motion that allows a peeling open of the snail.

It's quite clear that, whether knowingly or not, you have simply replaced a few words, dropped one, and added some others -- the word more was dropped, operates became functions, action became motion, facilitates became "allows a", and you added the word of. It's not significantly different. I am sympathetic to the fact that proper paraphrasing might be difficult when vocabulary is limited (there is only one way to describe the morphology of a leaf blade), but the structure of the sentences here and the imagery used is copied from the source instead of using the source to support text written in your own words that conveys the same meaning. Cheers, Rkitko ^(talk) 13:33, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan, then show me how you would rephrase the text you criticise (as I invited you to do after your initial revert) - being sympathetic to the problem of finding new words and phrases is not enough - lead by example and rewrite the offending text. The effort you have already expended on chastising me must be considerably less than correcting my transgression. Paul venter (talk) 15:36, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Paul, I'm not the one interested in including this information in that article. I saw a case of close paraphrasing and reverted. As I noted in my edit summary, the burden is on you to write in your own words if you think the article needs that information. The effort expended informing you that close paraphrasing is unnecessary and infringes on the copyright of other authors is just as valuable as writing article content. Hopefully you now know that close paraphrasing isn't permitted under most circumstances. This will prevent future problems. Rkitko ^(talk) 15:57, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan, your response is absolutely in line with what I expected......Paul venter (talk) 16:28, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Atlantic puffin

In 2013 I greatly expanded the article Atlantic puffin and brought it successfully to FAC. So I have an ongoing desire to see the article remain of high quality. The information you added seems inherently unlikely to me. Ravens are not usually considered as kleptoparasites in the way suggested and whether puffins have learned to behave in the way mentioned seems unlikely. Unless you can find a reliable source for the information I think it should be removed. I have raised this matter on the article's talk page, so please respond there. Another point, during the FAC process, careful attention is paid to the formatting of references. You have left a bare url in the article as a result of your addition. When editing articles, and especially FAs and GAs, it is best to adopt the format of citations already present in the article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:33, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are the person who wants to add the information so it is your responsibility to provide a reliable source. I tried "Corvus corax kleptoparasite Fratercula arctica" in Google Scholar and found nothing useful. You could look at this but the abstract does not mention fish being included in the raven's diet, and you would still need a source for the puffin behaviour. Do ravens steal puffins' catches? I couldn't find anything about that elsewhere. Some gulls and skuas do however so perhaps you misremembered what species of bird was involved. Or was it a throwaway remark "It almost seems as if the puffins have learned to ..."? I need convincing. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you unable to give the episode number and the timing within the episode? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:28, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want this to look like an edit war between the two of you, so I'll add my comments.

Although audiovisual material can be used as a reference, you need to give episode and timing, particularly in a featured article. Otherwise it's like give a multi-volume book as a ref without volume or page number
without pin-pointing the source, we don't know who has said this and with what authority. It could be an opinion from a non-expert, a mistake, or even a reflection of genuine research
the latter seems unlikely. Two of us at least have failed to find any published source for the claims you have made. A vague reference which can't be examined or verified is not acceptable, particulalry in an FA Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cnestis polyphylla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reunion. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stereospermum kunthianum

Hi, I think that what is now the Description section of Stereospermum kunthianum is too close a paraphrase (and in some cases a direct copyright violation) of this source. See Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. I'm reluctant to tag this with {{close paraphrase}} or {{copyvio}} as you may not have finished editing, but will have to do so if it isn't sorted out fairly soon. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:45, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This text:

" The alternate leaves are imparipinnately compound and some 25 cm long; leaflets are nearly opposite with one terminal leaflet, and with short, soft hairs, oblong to oblong-elliptic in shape, green and hairless above, yellow-green with prominent veins under, apex broadly tapering or abruptly attenuate, base tapering, margin entire or occasionally toothed in coppice growth, petiolules almost absent; petiole up to 7 cm long, caniculate above; young leaves sometimes toothed and hairy."

is, in my opinion, too close to this source and, for that reason, is too technical for Wikipedia readers. But I assume you'll be editing it further. Peter coxhead (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Sceliages

Hello there! I recently discovered Sceliages, and as a biologist interested in millipedes it is neat to learn of obligate millipede predators. However, a reference such as "Pers. comm. from Shaun A. Forgie, PhD" is unverifiable, and may constitute original research, even if true, and should be replaced by published sources. Also, the block quotes of Woodward -especially the Latin description- strike me as unnecessary and pedantic, of interest only to scarab systematists. I will do what I can to improve the article. Cheers! --Animalparty-- (talk) 20:57, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Costus spectabilis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DRC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

Hi Paul venter! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tree

Hello Paul venter. As per WP:BRD, I have reverted the Tree article back to the version that does not mention "underground trees". This is so the subject can be discussed on the talk page and a consensus can be reached. Please note that my reversion of your edit is not a statement about my personal opinion on the matter. Please also note that if you undertake any further reversions, you will be contravening WP:3RR. Thanks. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 20:31, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paul, please do not keep reverting back to your preferred version while the matter is under dispute - it doesn't solve anything. In order to stop the edit war, consensus must first be gained, and as per WP:BRD, this should be done with the article in its original version. Thanks. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 08:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PaleCloudedWhite, instead of telling me not to revert would you kindly be specific about YOUR reasons for removing an adequately sourced contribution? Paul venter (talk) 10:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Order of Little Bedlam

Dear Paul, Thanks for creating the article on the Order of Little Bedlam. It's good to see the information here. There was a problem with the caption on the image you uploaded a year ago, of Thomas Barker. The portrait is in fact of Sir Thomas Barker 1648-1707 - who was, correctly, a member of the Club - but your caption (and the image File title in Wikimedia Commons) is for Thomas Barker (meteorologist) (1722-1809) - whom it is evidently not. So I have put the correct caption on the image in the article.

But (forgive me if I am wrong) I feel sure this photographic image has been taken from the 2010 issue of the magazine in which it appeared as an illustration (Bryan Waites, 'Sir Thomas Barker and the Order of Little Bedlam', Rutland Local History and Record Society Newsletter No. 1 Pt 10 (April 2010), pp 5-6. read here), or else from an associated website - because it is cropped in the same way. I therefore wonder if the licence can really be free, as you put in the commons file? Sorry to ask but better safe than sorry! I have posted a query on the relevant talk pages. Thanks and sorry to trouble you about this. Eebahgum (talk) 12:02, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Intikon00.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Intikon00.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:34, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kensani00.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kensani00.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:34, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SolarReserve00.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SolarReserve00.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorted out - thank you Paul venter (talk) 08:57, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gomphrena celosioides, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reunion. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Kensani00.png

Thank you for uploading File:Kensani00.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Cryptic 01:17, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:SolarReserve00.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:SolarReserve00.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Cryptic 01:17, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Intikon00.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Intikon00.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Cryptic 01:17, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maytenus nemorosa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Addo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Callichirus kraussi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yabby. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing up the new ghost shrimp article

Hello Paul. I saw your new article on Callichirus kraussi. I fixed it up a bit to make it easier for a reader to find the info they want. I might also suggest that you start a very simple genus article on Callichirus which is not hard to do by copying and cutting down the species article and adding a species list. That way you could link to the species article from the genus one. You can use WoRMS as a source. WoRMS even gives you the citation to use at the bottom of each taxon page:

http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=367974

If you create a genus page, no matter how simple, your species article would no longer be an orphan. Best wishes, Invertzoo (talk) 11:45, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Origin of the name San Diego

Hello! Yes, I know that you believe San Diego is named for Santiago or Saint James. But it isn't. I just added an "etymology" section to the article, with a scholarly reference that clearly shows the area was named San Diego after Saint Didacus of Alcala (better known as San Diego). The still-exiting mission in San Diego is also called San Diego de Alcala (not Santiago de Compostello or any other variant of Santiago). Thanks for caring about San Diego, but we have to go with what the references say - not what some people believe. --MelanieN (talk) 18:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Even if "Didacus" is a Latinized form of "Diego", which it probably is, the "Diego" or James that the city was named for was not James the Apostle, the patron saint of Spain. San Diego de Alcala was a 15th-century monk. --MelanieN (talk) 18:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - that is not a compelling argument. Your scholarly reference has many 'scholarly' sources disagree with him - for one see http://www.behindthename.com/name/diego. Perhaps you might also read Santiago (name) and Diego. Failing to mention 'Santiago' in the etymology section and linking 'San Diego' directly with 'Saint Didacus' is blatantly ignoring dissident views and is a philological travesty. Paul venter (talk) 19:31, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion has been copied to the article's talk page and continues there. --MelanieN (talk) 21:29, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sefapanosaurus

Hallo Paul venter! I noticed you created the article Sefapanosaurus zastronensis. In the describing scientific article, the authors mention that A.W. Keyser found the fossils between 1936 and 1948. This obviously cannot be the famous palaeontologist André Werner Keyser. As you created the latter's article also, I wondered whether you knew who this other man (?) is. An elder relative maybe?

Greetings, --MWAK (talk) 18:21, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MWAK - Yes, I noticed that.......I've been offline for the last 4 days, but will ask Bruce Rubidge about that tomorrow. I should think it was just a careless blunder, but a bad one since it implies that HE misidentified the fossils.

cheers

Thank you! In any case, it would be interesting to determine the exact identity of the discoverer.--MWAK (talk) 15:49, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've talked to Bruce Rubidge and he agrees it's a blunder, but one of the co-authors Jonah is still unavailable.....

We can only wait :o).--MWAK (talk) 19:02, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Art Jewelry Forum

Hello, I am working on a pet project to help digitize information about the field of metalsmithing+jewelry. I started with making a page for Art jewelry forum (AJF), and have a list of artists that I would like to make pages for as well. The AJF page has been nominated for deletion because it is questioned if the organization is "notable". I am reaching out to you because I saw that you edited some pages that relate to studio craft, and thought you may have an informed opinion (unlike the mathematician who nominated the page for deletion) about whether or not it is a "notable organization". If you have an opinion, one way or another, please way in on the articles for deletion discussion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Art_jewelry_forum Clarefinin (talk) 21:10, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Josephine Duddle00.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Josephine Duddle00.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chas Grave

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Chas Grave, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://webmii.com/people?n=%22Chas%20Grave%22.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:51, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paul, you are an experienced editorso my guess is there is a innocuous explanation for the match between the new article and the other site mentioned. However I'm not seeing what it could be, and you haven't yet explained it, son taking the safe route and deleting the article. If there is an explanation please let me know my talk page and it can be easily restored, a low if that is done it needs more references is only the quote seems to be cited and no other information.--S Philbrick (Talk) 01:20, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Drosera magnifica

Hi Paul. I see you're working on the Drosera magnifica article. You might want to use this piece of news for a source as well: http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/internacional/en/scienceandhealth/2015/07/1662281-biologists-discover-new-species-of-giant-carnivorous-plant.shtml --Pikolas (talk) 12:45, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pikolas, Thanks for the link - I've included it in the references.

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Katharine Saunders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trinity College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Buxus macowanii, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Natal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:40, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Serenichthys kowiensis

Hi there. Thanks for starting the article Serenichthys. I deleted the verbatim text of the abstract, as it seemed excessive use of Non-free content that could easily be reworded. Also, there seems to be a good amount of content that is not about Serenichthys kowiensis , i.e. content that might better be incorporated in articles such as Coelacanth, Rhabdoderma, etc. Also, don't forget to cite sources with footnotes: if there are multiple sources, a minimum of one footnote per paragraph helps to keep correct attribution. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 02:21, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arthur Szyk09.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Szyk09.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:57, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reniform, Abaxial, Adaxial

Thank you for your contribution but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a dictionary. Please add reliable sources, name of category.Xx236 (talk) 10:46, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New article

Hello. It seems that you have a bit of experience. I have noticed you've created an article. That's good. Except it doesn't have sources. That's bad. I left it there because the article is new, but articles may get deleted after a while if they don't have sources. If you have questions, concerns, or would like to talk with me, simply click the links in my signature. Thanks. I'm returning...from the WikiDead. (But you still dare speak to me...) 11:35, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes indeed!! I put up the tag "in use" to convey the impression that I was busy on the article, while I went off for a spot of lunch. I had hoped that the message "This article is actively undergoing a major edit for a short while. To help avoid edit conflicts, please do not edit this page while this message is displayed" would be sufficient to stave off editors who were itching to tell me the various respects in which the article was still incomplete - but, to no avail. On a positive note, I'm sure that you perform a useful service on Wikipedia. cheers Paul venter (talk) 12:32, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kaditshwene

Great job in creating that article. It was listed in the list of Articles to be Created on Wikipedia:WikiProject South Africa/Wikipedia Primary School/Articles list. I am glad to see it now exists ! Thanks Anthere (talk) 17:19, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure! Paul venter (talk) 18:20, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mondia whitei, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fimbria. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phytelephas macrocarpa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santiago River. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Metschnikowia pulcherrima, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Candida. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Stereospermum kunthianum02.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Stereospermum kunthianum02.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:32, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eileen Adelaide Bruce, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Petersham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:12, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Aloe vera. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jytdog (talk) 07:25, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harry Struben, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transvaal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Strickland Goodall00.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:John Strickland Goodall00.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Majora (talk) 21:44, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Strickland Goodall00.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:John Strickland Goodall00.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't

…start pages, with no sources, and all original research. This is not your blog. It is an encyclopedia. The Wikipedia article traffic article is a shameful defiance of WP policies and guidelines. Le Prof 50.224.57.42 (talk) 11:30, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wikipedia article traffic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wikipedia article traffic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia article traffic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ringbang (talk) 14:33, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Strychnos pungens00.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Strychnos pungens00.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 00:51, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Strychnos pungens00.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Strychnos pungens00.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:55, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Strickland Goodall00.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:John Strickland Goodall00.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Paul venter. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anna Pavord00.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anna Pavord00.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brian Kesinger22.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brian Kesinger22.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anna Pavord00.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anna Pavord00.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brian Kesinger21.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brian Kesinger21.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello, I'm Ahunt. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Multirotor‎ have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. - Ahunt (talk) 16:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ahunt, would you please explain why you feel an external link is inappropriate for Wikipedia, and cite a reference from the MoS. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul venter (talk • contribs)

Sure, it is linked in the note I left you above at WP:ELNO, which says "5. Individual web pages[6] that primarily exist to sell products or services, or to web pages with objectionable amounts of advertising. For example, the mobile phone article should not link to web pages that mostly promote or advertise cell-phone products or services." Also WP:LINKSPAM which says: "Adding external links to an article or user page for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam." It is clearly not appropriate to add links to products for sale when the article is on the general subject. I have removed the link as per WP:VANDTYPES. You can note that explicitly says: "Adding or continuing to add spam external links is vandalism if the activity continues after a warning. A spam external link is one added to a page mainly for the purpose of promoting a website, product or a user's interests rather than to improve the page editorially." Future insertions will be treated as vandalism as per that Wikipedia policy. - Ahunt (talk) 12:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attacks

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Multirotor#Subjective_decisions_on_spam_external_links. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. - Ahunt (talk) 14:08, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your gratuitous advice.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul venter (talk • contribs)

Replaceable fair use File:Clare Abbott00.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Clare Abbott00.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:31, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Maureen Elizabeth Church03.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Maureen Elizabeth Church03.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done

Replaceable fair use File:Maureen Elizabeth Church03.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Maureen Elizabeth Church03.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:38, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Robert Goldston01.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Robert Goldston01.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:04, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Goldston01.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Robert Goldston01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Goldston01.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Robert Goldston01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking

Hello, I'm Smjg. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Oecanthus rufescens. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Smjg (talk) 17:19, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Goldston01.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Robert Goldston01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daniel Rossouw Kannemeyer, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages San and Alfred Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Paul venter. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Predatory journals

Predatory journals, by definition, do not have functional peer review. They accept articles based on payment, not merit. They presumptively fail WP:RS, and this has been the consensus in several past discussions of the subject. On Wikipedia, they are often added by the publishers or authors (OMICS Group are site banned as a result). Guy (Help!) 12:27, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that - I had no idea.......Paul venter (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Peter Richard Wallis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Robert Goldston01.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Robert Goldston01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hamlet Clark, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corpus Christi College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Clodomir Houard00.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Clodomir Houard00.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert William Plant, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Zululand and Natal, South Africa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of PrncesRachel

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on PrncesRachel, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:45, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harry Hall00.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:10, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Winifred Wright04a.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:16, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:William Campbell Tait00.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:14, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lady-Cynthia-Tait00f.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:19, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lady-Cynthia-Tait01.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:19, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Georges Léonnec00.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:12, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Georges Léonnec00.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Georges Léonnec00.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:18, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hans Otto Hoheisen00.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:12, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosemary Charlotte Holcroft02a.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:23, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosemary Charlotte Holcroft01.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 23:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hertha Bokelmann00.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Streptocarpus rexii00a.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Auriol Batten02.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:14, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Paul venter. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Norman Cornish01.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stan Jones00.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:09, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pauline Bohnen01.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Goldston01.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Robert Goldston01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:33, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

Just follow the steps 1, 2 and 3 as shown and fill in the details

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.

While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
Then click on "templates",
Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details beside a magnifying glass followed by clicking said button,
If the article is available in Pubmed Central, you have to add the pmc parameter manually -- click on "show additional fields" in the template and you will see the "pmc" field. Please add just the number and don't include "PMC".

We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:37, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joseph Burke (botanist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Hooker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:26, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Paul venter (talk) 09:03, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Stanley Charles Seagrief01a.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Stanley Charles Seagrief01a.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am puzzled - if the bot did not nominate this file for deletion then what is the issue? regards Paul venter (talk) 20:11, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Protos vehicles05.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Protos vehicles05.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem Paul venter (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frederick William Moore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trinity College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:EA Bowles.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:EA Bowles.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:EA Bowles.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EA Bowles.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:37, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Francisco Javier Matis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Francisco Javier Matis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zaxxon0 (talk) 21:22, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed that this has no content, but I am working on an article with the same title at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francisco_Javier_Mat%C3%ADs and am concerned that deleting the zero content article will affect the other one. The duplication of titles came about when I attemped a redirect which went wrong. cheers Paul venter (talk) 21:35, 12 April 2020 (UTC) Paul venter (talk) 21:37, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Francisco Javier Matís, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antioquia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:20, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Bessie Niemeyer Marshall00.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Bessie Niemeyer Marshall00.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The new Johann Jakob Walther (artist) article

Hi Paul. I just compared the Johann Jakob Walther (artist) article you created today and the article Johann Walter (painter). Is there any chance these two articles might refer to the same person? They both worked for Count Johann of Nassau-Idstein in the seventeenth century and they both produced floral anthologies, two of which survive today. Best regards — Hebrides (talk) 20:41, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hebrides, Undoubtedly the same. The Wiki search engine and Google search both missed this, perhaps because most reliable sources spelled 'Walther' with an 'h'. I will merge the articles after looking again into the Walter/Walther spelling issue. Thank you for the heads-up. Cheers Paul venter (talk) 04:47, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of florilegia and botanical codices, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Archibald Fullarton

Possible additions to this article:

Biographical info on Fullarton himself
Biographical info on John MacNab - see https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/3c969ae5-056b-44ca-8440-dab40736c661
History of the company (when did it begin, what happened to it?) - maybe about 1810 to 1880?
Glasgow, or Edinburgh - see https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/1824-beauties-rev-ralph-erskine-1732808127 - appears Edinburgh from circa 1843 onwards; New York enterprise of Fullarton, MacNab & Co; printing enterprise of Fullarton and MacNab, Leith Walk, Edinburgh
Connection and separate existence with Khull, Blackie and any other Blackie connections - see Blackie_and_Son; "Blackie, Fullarton, and Co" in late 1820s to 1830
Legal case of Atlas Company against Fullarton
Connection with the Secession Church (Seceders, Associate Presbytery) as Fullarton's published works by Ralph and Ebenezer Erskine, John Brown of Haddington, and Ralph Wardlaw, as well as other evangelical authors from Scotland and elsewhere

I have had some 70 items for sale over the past 20 years with Fullarton included in the publisher name. Can provide records sorted by date showing different associations of names during the 19th century. --PeterR2 (talk) 10:23, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Edna Plumstead01a.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Edna Plumstead01a.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing this out - someone must have inadvertently removed the image. Paul venter (talk) 14:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hiroshi Yoshida01a.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hiroshi Yoshida01a.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ymblanter (talk) 22:01, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:William Cornwallis Harris01.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:William Cornwallis Harris01.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --TheImaCow (talk) 16:45, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Edith Holden01.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Edith Holden01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Endangered Wildlife Trust00.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Endangered Wildlife Trust00.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Otto Baumberger02.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Otto Baumberger02.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Charles Michell01.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Charles Michell01.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. matt br 12:00, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Charles Michell05.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Charles Michell05.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. matt br 12:05, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:South African traders

A tag has been placed on Category:South African traders indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:34, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ancient Greek statesmen has been nominated for renaming

Category:Ancient Greek statesmen has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 16:02, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Homer LeRoy Shantz00.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Homer LeRoy Shantz00.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:19, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ernest Bieler00a.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ernest Bieler00a.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Moses Angel00.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Moses Angel00.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Viney

The article John Viney has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. WP:SIGCOV lacking. Orphaned for a decade.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PepperBeast (talk) 17:18, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:French phytogeographers has been nominated for splitting

Category:French phytogeographers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:52, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:South African ethnologists

A tag has been placed on Category:South African ethnologists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Anna Pavord

Good work on Anna Pavord. Viriditas (talk) 08:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Salt islands

What are the "salt islands" which you seem to have added to Southern carmine bee-eater? JMK (talk) 08:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AfrikaBurn logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AfrikaBurn logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:05, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]