User talk:82.132.213.165
Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. Administrators may want to consider using a range block as cellular IPs change frequently. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
December 2018
This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, as you did at User talk:Beyond My Ken, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bradv🍁 18:30, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
- This is the banned editor HarveyCarter. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:53, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bbb23 (talk) 19:09, 31 December 2018 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
October 2020
Hello, I'm Synoman Barris. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Fowler's syndrome have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Megan☺️ Talk to the monster 08:57, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
January 2022
Hi 82.132.213.165! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Code reuse several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Code reuse, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Pyrite Pro (talk) 14:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- "Code reuse may be achieved by different ways dependending on a complexity of a programming language chosen and range from a lower-level approaches like code copy-pasting"... you really felt it was worth your while to add that text back, after I removed it? 82.132.213.165 (talk) 15:06, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |