User talk:CartoonDiablo
Archives:
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, CartoonDiablo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frankfurt School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Brooks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:13, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
"Second referendum" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Second referendum. Since you had some involvement with the Second referendum redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ‑ Iridescent 17:53, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
A heads-up
In 2011 you created a redirect, at Amir_Mohamed_Meshal.
In my opinion that kind of redirection is generally a bad idea. It misleads contributors who might otherwise see the redlink, and work to create an article about individuals like Meshal.
And it is generally confusing to our readers. What one will often see are sentences with two links, one of which is a mere redirect to the second link.
We have policies and procedures on redlinks. When a redlink could credibly have an article at that page I think those wikidocuments recommend leaving it as a redlink. Geo Swan (talk) 23:29, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- You're more than welcome to nominate the redirect for deletion, I just thought it was helpful given that case but if it's not I won't have any problems with getting rid of it. --CartoonDiablo (talk) 00:23, 2 June 2020 (UTC)