Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important! The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s). The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section: * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~ Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing. This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 16:45 on 7 November 2024 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Reports

Bot-reported

• 216.73.67.180 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 3 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user blanking articles, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 15:59, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

User-reported

• 2600:8800:FF0E:300:398C:4AFC:56AE:5217 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) IP removing content falsely claiming that previous illegitimate reverts were valid, when the reverts claimed information was not in citations [1], [2], when they clearly were in the source. [3] SkylarEstrada (talk) 10:07, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

  2 other editors have reverted the bias and opinions of User:SkylarEstrada and I most certainly am not User:The Introvert Next To You or User:Moscow Mule as User:SkylarEstrada just did above when they quoted this here [4] and here [5]. Further, user SkylarEstrada seems to have taken over https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Current_events to the point of WP:OWN wp: own. This user has repeatedly made endless posts on that page which are only Pro-HAMAS. All the citations by this editor are from al jazera as if wikipedia has become the newspaper for al jazera = WP:NOTNEWS wp: wikipedia is not a newspaper. Further, I should report that this user only created their account 6 months ago and now believes they OWN https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Current_events . Further, it appears to me that a sockpuppet investigation of this user is warranted. Please look at their posts on each and every day at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Current_events . Literally one half of all posts on that page is by this user and they are clearly biased and pro-HAMAS = see this day as an example https://xtools.wmcloud.org/articleinfo/en.wikipedia.org/Portal:Current_events/2023_November_10. Further, this user in bad faith came to this board to report me without giving me a headsup on my talk page = WP:GAME wp: gaming the system. Further, this editor has violated the following rules [...] (Copy of {{subst:alert/first|a-i}} removed ~ToBeFree) Further, here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:HJ_Mitchell&diff=prev&oldid=1184623098 this user appears to be shopping for an administrator = WP:ADMINSHOP wp: shop for admin.2600:8800:FF0E:300:398C:4AFC:56AE:5217 (talk) 10:31, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

  (Non-administrator comment) - your arguments don't seem to hold much water here. It's usually preferred to discuss issues with the editor on their user talk page instead of reverting an edit with the reasoning of more people agreeing to your preferred change. If you think that someone is engaged in ownership behavior, perhaps you should reach out to them, too, though I should mention that activity in a specific board alone is not a sign of WP:OWN, as you claimed. I don't understand your sockpuppeting accusation either.

  I therefore believe this matter should be discussed with the involved editors first, or taken to a forum like WP:ANI to reach a consensus. NotAGenious (talk) 12:19, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

• Libernius (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Disruptive; persistently restoring their old unconstructive edits despite having been blocked for a week. Skitash (talk) 10:15, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
• HimaIaya (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On List of X-Men members: actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. User's only edits have been reverted due to vandalism and now they're just trying to pull the wool over my eyes. CommissarDoggo (talk) 12:37, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
• 197.147.100.168 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – BLP violations. Renewal6 (talk) 13:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

  Actually the biographies are of corpses, not living people. 197.147.100.168 (talk) 13:23, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

• King Ayan Das (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Disruptive page moves and page duplicates. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 13:21, 12 November 2023 (UTC)