Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flower Tucci: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for Flower Tucci. (TW)
 
Flower Tucci: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
===[[:Flower Tucci]]===
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
<!--Template:Afd top


Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus|talk]], [[Special:CentralAuth/Jo-Jo Eumerus|contributions]]) 09:10, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
===[[:Flower Tucci]]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|Flower Tucci}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flower Tucci|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 September 1#{{anchorencode:Flower Tucci}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Flower_Tucci Stats]</span>)
:{{la|Flower Tucci}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flower Tucci|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 September 1#{{anchorencode:Flower Tucci}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Flower_Tucci Stats]</span>)
:({{Find sources AFD|Flower Tucci}})
:({{Find sources AFD|Flower Tucci}})
I don't believe the sources are adequate to support notability under [[WP:BIO]]. [[User:Morbidthoughts|Morbidthoughts]] ([[User talk:Morbidthoughts|talk]]) 08:31, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
I don't believe the sources are adequate to support notability under [[WP:BIO]]. [[User:Morbidthoughts|Morbidthoughts]] ([[User talk:Morbidthoughts|talk]]) 08:31, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Women|list of Women-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 08:34, 1 September 2019 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/California|list of California-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 08:34, 1 September 2019 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Film|list of Film-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 09:51, 1 September 2019 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Television|list of Television-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 09:51, 1 September 2019 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Sexuality and gender|list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 09:51, 1 September 2019 (UTC)</small>
:<span style="font-size: 85%;">Note: This debate has been added to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography|WikiProject Pornography]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Deletion|list of deletions]].[[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 09:52, 1 September 2019 (UTC) </span>
*'''Delete''' as couldn't find any significant coverage in reliable sources via google news, books, or general search and not seeing much rs in the article. The awards are all minor awards so if the Pornbio SNG was still operating that would not be passed either, thanks [[User:Atlantic306|Atlantic306]] ([[User talk:Atlantic306|talk]]) 19:34, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' a non-notable performer who lacks the significant coverage needed to pass GNG.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 01:42, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' While I'd argue that 24 industry award nominations and 4 wins is possibly enough for notability alone, the fact that she's also one of the few industry performers to have done mainstream (if related) work, on a national-televised reality TV series would put her just over the top. [[Special:Contributions/148.4.201.116|148.4.201.116]] ([[User talk:148.4.201.116|talk]]) 15:32, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
:*Even before the WP:PORNBIO guideline was superseded by [[WP:ENT]], porn award nominations and scene-related award wins were removed as notability criteria. Porn award ceremonies tend to nominate almost everybody for something. The AVN Award is notorious for this. In the end, a new consensus formed: porn awards do not establish notability by themselves. Without acknowledgement from reliable independent references, mainstream work does establish notability either. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:22, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Lacks significant coverage by independent reliable sources to pass [[WP:BASIC]]. Lacks independent references that support notability per WP:ENT. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 02:48, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 09:10, 8 September 2019

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:10, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Flower Tucci (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't believe the sources are adequate to support notability under WP:BIO. Morbidthoughts (talk) 08:31, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:34, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:34, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:51, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:51, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:51, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:52, 1 September 2019 (UTC) [reply]
  • Delete as couldn't find any significant coverage in reliable sources via google news, books, or general search and not seeing much rs in the article. The awards are all minor awards so if the Pornbio SNG was still operating that would not be passed either, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:34, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a non-notable performer who lacks the significant coverage needed to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:42, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep While I'd argue that 24 industry award nominations and 4 wins is possibly enough for notability alone, the fact that she's also one of the few industry performers to have done mainstream (if related) work, on a national-televised reality TV series would put her just over the top. 148.4.201.116 (talk) 15:32, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Even before the WP:PORNBIO guideline was superseded by WP:ENT, porn award nominations and scene-related award wins were removed as notability criteria. Porn award ceremonies tend to nominate almost everybody for something. The AVN Award is notorious for this. In the end, a new consensus formed: porn awards do not establish notability by themselves. Without acknowledgement from reliable independent references, mainstream work does establish notability either. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy