Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flower Tucci

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:10, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Flower Tucci

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Flower Tucci (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't believe the sources are adequate to support notability under WP:BIO. Morbidthoughts (talk) 08:31, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:34, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:34, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:51, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:51, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:51, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:52, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

• Delete as couldn't find any significant coverage in reliable sources via google news, books, or general search and not seeing much rs in the article. The awards are all minor awards so if the Pornbio SNG was still operating that would not be passed either, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:34, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
• Delete a non-notable performer who lacks the significant coverage needed to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:42, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
• Keep While I'd argue that 24 industry award nominations and 4 wins is possibly enough for notability alone, the fact that she's also one of the few industry performers to have done mainstream (if related) work, on a national-televised reality TV series would put her just over the top. 148.4.201.116 (talk) 15:32, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

• Even before the WP:PORNBIO guideline was superseded by WP:ENT, porn award nominations and scene-related award wins were removed as notability criteria. Porn award ceremonies tend to nominate almost everybody for something. The AVN Award is notorious for this. In the end, a new consensus formed: porn awards do not establish notability by themselves. Without acknowledgement from reliable independent references, mainstream work does establish notability either. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

• Delete. Lacks significant coverage by independent reliable sources to pass WP:BASIC. Lacks independent references that support notability per WP:ENT. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.