Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Heart diagram-en.svg 2

Heart diagram

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2012 at 07:15:44 (UTC)

Original – Structure diagram of the human heart. Blue components indicate de-oxygenated blood pathways and red components indicate oxygenated blood pathways.

Reason

This was previously nominated by User:Makeemlighter here and was closed with no quorum. The diagram has evolved a bit and thought might give it another try. Issues raised by Jjron have been fixed if not improved.

Articles in which this image appears

Human heart, Heart, Ventricle (heart), Chordae tendineae

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Biology

Creator

ZooFari

• Support as nominator ----ZooFari 07:15, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
• Oppose. OK diagram and I like the cross-section approach. However, in the two general hear articles, there are a lot of similar diagrams and such (one has this image dropped down into references and is just way overloaded with same stuff). For the more particular articles on heart string and ventricle, the diagram is somewhat helpful as they lack a diagram. But I think for those articles, this drawing is overkill, labeling every part of the heart, rather than the few relevant to that smaller topic.TCO (Reviews needed) 06:53, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
  • You say "in the two general hear articles, there are a lot of similar diagrams and such", but there aren't any other cross-sectional diagrams of hearts in either article. There are external labeling diagrams, but you don't get a perspective on the actual shape of the chambers. Spencer^T♦C 06:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
• Support per previous nomination; I supported that as well. Spencer^T♦C 06:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
• Support, AGF it is accurate to the sources. upstateNYer 05:09, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
• Support It is a beautiful diagram --Guerillero | My Talk 19:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
• Support, although the highlight on the left common carotid artery should be curved to match the shape of the artery. Kaldari (talk) 07:03, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
• Comment One of the references (second) is a broken link which should be fixed. It is worth putting a webcite (http://www.webcitation.org/) link in a comment next to references if something is liable to disappear (eg web links). JJ Harrison (talk) 23:26, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Suspend until reference fixed. Makeemlighter (talk) 01:20, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

 Fixed Updated sources and fixed gradient errors. ZooFari (talk) 05:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)