Jump to content

Second Battle of Kulm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Second Battle of Kulm / Battle of Teplitz
Part of the German campaign of the Sixth Coalition
Date17 September 1813
Location
Kulm (Chlumec) in northern Bohemia
50°41′59″N 13°56′23″E / 50.699725°N 13.939653°E / 50.699725; 13.939653
Result Coalition victory
Belligerents
 Austria
 Prussia
 Russia
 France
Commanders and leaders
Austrian Empire Karl von Schwarzenberg
Austrian Empire Eugen von Württemberg
Kingdom of Prussia Friedrich Graf Kleist
First French Empire Napoleon
Strength
120,000[1] 60,000[1]
Casualties and losses
Light[2] Moderate[3]

The Second Battle of Kulm or the Battle of Teplitz[a] was fought on 17 September 1813 upon the heights immediately above the town of Kulm (Chlumec) in northern Bohemia, by the Army of Bohemia commanded by the Austrian field marshal, Prince of Schwarzenberg, and a French army under the command of Napoleon. It resulted in a Coalition victory over the French.

Background

[edit]

After the defeat of the French at the 1st Battle of Kulm on 30 August, the Coalition armies of Prussia, Russia, and Austria commanded by Schwarzenberg bivouacked in Bohemia for a period of approximately a week to recuperate and bring up reinforcements.[4]

Meanwhile, from his military position at Dresden, Napoleon continued to prosecute the war. Aside from Schwarzenberg’s armies to the south in Bohemia, Napoleon was threatened by Coalition armies at Berlin commanded by Bernadotte and at Breslau commanded by Blücher.[5] For their part, the Coalition commanders were attempting to execute a strategic plan during the summer and fall of 1813, to avoid direct confrontations with the French Army when commanded on the battlefield by Napoleon choosing rather to retire and attack his lieutenants wherever they commanded or were positioned.[6][7] This strategy proved quite successful during this time, as Napoleon’s commanders were defeated in important initiatives in his absence at the Battle of Großbeeren, the Battle of the Katzbach, the 1st Battle of Kulm, and the Battle of Dennewitz. In addition to the battlefield losses, the strategy kept Napoleon off-balance and weakened his core army at Dresden as he frequently led his men out and back in exhausting but useless attempts to go to the aid of his lieutenants.[8]

Continuing to watch Napoleon during the first week of September and again approximately a week later, Schwarzenberg sent forces north on the Pirna Road toward Dresden to conduct reconnaissance. In both cases, Napoleon detected and approached the Coalition forces causing them to withdraw.[9] By that time, the Coalition strategy of avoidance had become evident to Napoleon. In response, Napoleon reorganized his corps in and around Dresden and made the decision to drive Schwarzenberg’s troopers back across the Erzgebirge Mountains and force a battle on the plains of Kulm.[1][10]

Battle

[edit]

On 15 September, Napoleon made his plans for the consolidated of forces and led his corps south from Gieshibel to Peterswalde causing Coalition forces to withdraw in a disorderly fashion.[1] The following day, Napoleon advanced to the defile and mountain pass at Noellendorf.[11] Protecting Napoleon’s right flank at Geyersberg was Saint Cyr. Schwarzenberg meanwhile had continued his withdrawal out of the mountains south to a point close to Kulm where he repositioned his army to resist Napoleon’s entry onto the plain. Supporting Schwarzenberg’s deployment on the extreme right was Austrian General Meerfeldt.[12] In total, the Army of Bohemia had 120,000 men assembled for battle compared to less than 60,000 for Napoleon. [1]

Napoleon spent the night at Noellendorf and rose early on 17 September to reassess his situation. Although haze and fog enveloped his position, Napoleon made the decision to initiate an attack on the Coalition forces and sent his battalions down the mountain on the road and through the woods. As the French advanced they were fired upon by Russian light infantry and artillery positioned high above the road. Fighting along the road continued until the French infantry, cavalry, and artillery fought their way down to the plain advancing to Doelnitz.[11]

Although the weather had improved somewhat, the full magnitude of the Coalition force was not evident to Napoleon. As the French advance paused, a Coalition cannonade began from several different directions. Later during the course of the battle, Schwarzenberg threatened Napoleon’s flanks by sending a brigade of Prussian Ziethen cavalry through mountain paths to attack the French on the right and concurrently sending the Austrians commanded by Meerfeldt up into the hills on Napoleon’s left near Knienitz in an effort to attack the French from the rear.[13][14]

As Napoleon responded to these threats by partially re-ascending the heights and using reserves to defend at Knienitz, nightfall and a violent rainfall caused the armies in the field to become obscured. This ended the battle with Napoleon withdrawing back into the mountains to Noellendorf. The Coalition forces chose not to pursue, reforming at Kulm on the plain. No fight occurred the next day and on 19 September, Napoleon’s forces withdrew back to Gieshibel.[15][16]

Aftermath

[edit]

Later that month, Schwarzenberg leading the Army of Bohemia and Blücher leading the Army of Silesia would advance toward Dresden forcing Napoleon to withdraw west to Leipzig.[17][18]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Also known under the alternative spelling of the Battle of Toeplitz

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e Thiers 1861, p. 503.
  2. ^ Smith 1998, p. 455.
  3. ^ Smith 1998, p. 456.
  4. ^ Cathcart 1850, pp. 258–260.
  5. ^ Chandler 1966, pp. 900–901.
  6. ^ Chandler 1966, p. 901.
  7. ^ Thiers 1861, p. 436.
  8. ^ Thiers 1861, p. 500.
  9. ^ Cathcart 1850, pp. 260–262.
  10. ^ Odeleben 1820, p. 292.
  11. ^ a b Odeleben 1820, p. 309.
  12. ^ Cathcart 1850, p. 263.
  13. ^ Odeleben 1820, p. 310.
  14. ^ Cathcart 1850, pp. 263–264.
  15. ^ Odeleben 1820, p. 311.
  16. ^ Cathcart 1850, p. 264.
  17. ^ Odeleben 1820, pp. 319–322.
  18. ^ Chandler 1966, p. 916.

References

[edit]
  • Cathcart, Sir George (1850). Commentaries on the War in Russia and Germany in 1812 and 1813. London: John Murray.
  • Chandler, David G. (1966). The Campaigns of Napoleon. New York: The Macmillan Company.
  • Odeleben, Baron von (1820). Kempe, John Alfred (ed.). A Circumstantial Narrative of the Campaign in Saxony, in the Year 1813: Volume 1 (in German). London: John Murray.
  • Smith, Digby (1998). The Greenhill Napoleonic Wars Data Book. London: Greenhill Books. ISBN 1-85367-276-9.
  • Thiers, Adolphe (1861). Campbell, D. Forbes; Herbert, Henry William (eds.). History of the Consulate and the Empire of France Under Napoleon, Volume 4 (in French). Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Company.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Turnbull, Peter Evan (1840), Austria, London: J. Murray, p. 17
[edit]
Preceded by
Battle of Dennewitz
Napoleonic Wars
Second Battle of Kulm
Succeeded by
Battle of the Göhrde
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy