Talk:Đurađ I Balšić
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Đurađ I Balšić article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Peja
[edit]Ragusa is also called Dubrovnik in the article, we might as well refer to Peja as Pescium or Episkion, the respective Latin and Greek names widely used during that time. What justifies the usage of the Serbian form? The domain of Balsha was certainly not a fully Slavic one. AlexBachmann (talk) 19:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Do not muddy the water, please. There’s nothing to debate here. The Balšićs identified as Slavs, were Christians, and spoke Serbian. Whether their distant ancestry was a Vlach-Slavic mix, Albanian-Slavic mix, French, or something else is irrelevant. The town of Peja is not mentioned in their charters, and it just happens to share a name with a local male nickname. — Sadko (words are wind) 19:19, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- I suggest you reading the article of the Balsha and get a clearer picture of the situation.
The Balšićs [...] were Christians
So were almost all Albanians at that time, is being Christian now solely attributed to being Serbian? Guess you learn new things every day. I don't see this conversation going anywhere, I maintain my arguments I've provided. AlexBachmann (talk) 23:48, 3 October 2024 (UTC)- Unconstructive snide comments aside, POVPUSH and stonewalling will come to an end sooner or later. You have provided zero arguments but regardless I'll wait for a new consensus. — Sadko (words are wind) 10:20, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- What's POV about that statement? I'm referring to the opinion that is the most common one today, even if it is only a slight majority.
- The only one WP:STONEWALLING is you. So, again: Why don't we use the Latin name for Peja, or even the Greek one? The Serbian form might have been used (at best) in some other Slavic-speaking Balkan countries at that time. But that's it. (Even that would be to substantiate) I see no reason to include the Serbian orthography.
- In contrast to Scutari, a widely used name, even in usage today. AlexBachmann (talk) 21:25, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Unconstructive snide comments aside, POVPUSH and stonewalling will come to an end sooner or later. You have provided zero arguments but regardless I'll wait for a new consensus. — Sadko (words are wind) 10:20, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (royalty) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (royalty) articles
- Royalty work group articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs of royalty and nobility
- Wikipedia requested photographs of people
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Montenegro articles
- High-importance Montenegro articles
- Start-Class Albania articles
- Mid-importance Albania articles
- WikiProject Albania articles
- Start-Class Serbia articles
- Mid-importance Serbia articles
- WikiProject Serbia articles