Talk:Chinese ophthalmology
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for merging with Traditional Chinese medicine on 21 November 2016. The result of the discussion was not merged. |
Merge to Traditional Chinese medicine?
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of the discussion was no consensus to merge. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:51, 9 June 2018 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
[1] --BallenaBlanca (Talk) 02:09, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support Makes sense to me Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:50, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose: Traditional Chinese medicine is already 140k and unwieldy; Ophthalmology is sufficiently distinct branch of medicine that it seems reasonable for Chinese Ophthalmology to have a distinct page. The further reading section alone suggests that there are more than enough references supporting this as a distinct topic. Klbrain (talk) 21:16, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/30 October 2015
- Accepted AfC submissions
- Start-Class China-related articles
- Unknown-importance China-related articles
- Start-Class China-related articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- Start-Class medicine articles
- Low-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages