Template:Did you know nominations/Crime in Sri Lanka
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Gatoclass (talk) 14:46, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Crime in Sri Lanka
[edit]- ... that Sri Lanka (police cars pictured) is cited as "one of the most corrupt nations in the world"?
Created by Bonkers The Clown (talk). Self nominated at 13:21, 12 June 2013 (UTC).
- Date, length, hook, all checked. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 01:05, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- On hold per issues raised at this discussion. Gatoclass (talk) 11:34, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- Subsequently, this article has been substantially edited and expanded by 3 others (Dr. Blofeld, Nvvchar, and me).
While I think an ALT hook might be more appropriate, I also think that the DYK talkpage issues have been addressed in this particular article.--Rosiestep (talk) 18:36, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- Subsequently, this article has been substantially edited and expanded by 3 others (Dr. Blofeld, Nvvchar, and me).
- Needs a new full review now that an expansion has been done. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:01, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
- I still don't like the look of this one, coverage is patchy and unbalanced. I need to check the article against its sources for comparison but I have very little time to devote to wikipedia ATM. Gatoclass (talk) 11:07, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
- The hook is unacceptable. I've done some more work on the article but not to the level where it's ready for promotion. I'll contact the article creator. --Rosiestep (talk) 15:11, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry to all those that helped me, but crime articles no longer interest me so I wish to withdraw. If a kind soul would wish to help and include more, it would be appreciated. But if not, goodbye. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 15:21, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
- Since it appears no-one wants to do any more on this nom, I think it's time to decline it. Gatoclass (talk) 05:20, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- The hook is unacceptable. I've done some more work on the article but not to the level where it's ready for promotion. I'll contact the article creator. --Rosiestep (talk) 15:11, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
- I still don't like the look of this one, coverage is patchy and unbalanced. I need to check the article against its sources for comparison but I have very little time to devote to wikipedia ATM. Gatoclass (talk) 11:07, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
- Agreed, withdrawn.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 06:47, 19 July 2013 (UTC)