User:NebY
| This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:NebY. |
I've been editing here[a] since 2005, off and on, but I've learnt a lot more than I've contributed.
For he has not written what was said nor the true sense of what was said, but instead offers what he thinks should have been said, and enumerates in all these speeches the concomitant details like someone at school trying his hand at a set theme; as if he were making a display of his own ability but not offering an account of what was truly spoken.
— Polybius 12.25a, [1]
Yet despite all the failures, preconceptions and deceptions, Wikipedia's a marvel.
Might be handy some day
[edit]- Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines
- Wikipedia:Deprecated sources
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources
- Wikipedia:List of companies engaged in the self-publishing business
- Wikimedia hashtag search
Special:LinkSearch, {{LinkSummaryLive}} - {{ubl}}
- Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace
- {{IPuser}} eg 177.240.49.208 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), or {{IPuser2}} eg 177.240.49.208
- Wikipedia:Template index/Cleanup
- {{Contentious topics/alert/first}}
- {{fake heading}}
- {{CURRENTTIME}} 03:35 {{UTC}} 2024-12-24 03:35 UTC - sigs are UTC, history local
- Maybe robust? 101,325 pascals (101.325 kPa), 101,325 Pa (101.325 kPa), 101,325
- Parliament diagrams
- User:NebY/referencing
- Wikipedia:Large language models
- Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trivia sections (incl MOS:POPCULT/MOS:CULTURALREFS); Wikipedia:"In popular culture" content (incl WP:IPCV); Wikipedia talk:Verifiability/Archive 63#RfC: Are "in popular culture" entries "self-sourcing" or do they require a reference under Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources?
- MOS:PIPESTYLE
- MOS:SELFREF
- {{difftext}}
- Wikipedia:Wikidata#Appropriate usage in articles
MOS:ERA serves us well as a truce. Without it, there are passionate, forthright and principled editors who would remove every BCE/CE from every article they worked on and some who would seek out any other uses too, restricted only by the equally passionate, forthright and principled editors busily removing BC/AD. You can see some strong opinions in 2022's discussion Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers/Archive 161#Article titles for years: BC/AD or BCE/CE.
Add talk page archiving with Help:Archiving (plain and simple). Bot may take 1-4 days to begin archiving, during which time there'll be a red link in the archives box. Or {{subst:Setup auto archiving}}, which is less likely to create a single very large archive on the first archiving of a very large page.
Notes
[edit]- ^ By "here", I mean Wikipedia, particularly the English-language encyclopedia at en.wikipedia.org. If you're reading this somewhere else such as "WikiProjectMed" (e.g. https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User:NebY), it's not true and it reflects very badly on them.
- ^ Marincola, John, ed. (2017). On writing history: from Herodotus to Herodian. Penguin classics. London: Penguin Books. pp. 96–97. ISBN 978-0-14-139357-5. OCLC 991754046.