User talk:10alatham

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, 10alatham, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! VictorianMutant (talk) 09:10, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Will James (Welsh footballer) for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Will James (Welsh footballer), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Will James (Welsh footballer) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Pee Jay 10:23, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adam Henley for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Adam Henley, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Henley (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Pee Jay 10:26, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Biographies of Living Persons prods from articles without addressing the issue, as you did with Jhon Pírez. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective talk page instead. Thank you. iGeMiNix/What's up?/My Stuff 17:55, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Jhon Pírez. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. - Happysailor 14:31, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Jhon Pírez. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Wayne Olajuwon chat 14:33, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For the last time, you can't use Wikipedia as a source. It's not reliable. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 14:34, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Fabio Zamblera. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. He did not play for Italy U21 team, if you submit hoax again, i will ask admin to block you. Matthew_hk t c 03:38, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fabio Zamblera for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Fabio Zamblera, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabio Zamblera (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Matthew_hk t c 03:47, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/10alatham for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. bonadea contributions talk 13:15, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jhon Pírez for deletion

The article Jhon Pírez is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jhon Pírez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Zanoni (talk) 18:00, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/10alatham, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:17, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]