User talk:Afterwriting

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anne, Princess Royal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equestrian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Wimberley Mossman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cardinal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jenny Geddes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Episcopal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi! I know we had disagreements on the 1662 BCP page, but I would appreciate your MOS help on a question regarding another article I'm in the draft stage of. I already asked Ltwin this question, but figured you were also a good ask on the topic given your familiarity with it and MOS experience. The standard naming convention for Books of Common Prayer is "Book of Common Prayer ([Year of full adoption])". Unfortunately, the article I'm helping start is the 1928 American BCP and there's already an article for the English 1928 BCP. Do you think moving the first article to "Book of Common Prayer (England, 1928)" and titling the new article "Book of Common Prayer (U.S., 1928)" is a good idea? Or maybe some other option? Your input is appreciated and I'll tag you as soon as a final draft is ready so that you can implement MOS edits before I move it in a stable form to the mainspace. ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:24, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited St Peter's, Eastern Hill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page High Mass.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Church Army, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evangelist.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting discussion for George Pell

An article that been involved with (George Pell) has content that is proposed to be removed and moved to another article (Name to be decided). If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. _MB190417_ (talk) 14:05, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Bendigo

Hi Afterwriting, I have recently joined WikiProject Bendigo and I am currently recruiting more editors to join also. I can see that you are a regular editor of Victorian-related articles, so I was wondering whether you might be interested in joining the project, as there are still a number of Bendigo articles that need improvement. Please let me know what you think. All the best, Lotsw73 (talk) 04:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hannah Grier Coome, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orangemen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Cleese, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spaghetti Westerns edits

You have reverted hours of diligent hard work. I spent time painstakingly proofreading and copyediting the spaghetti Westerns article, just for you to come along and arbitrarily revert nearly everything willy nilly.

I suggest letting knowledgeable editors improve Wikipedia. Reverting valid changes improves nothing. milladrive (talk) 17:44, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Really? What I have actually reverted are your multiple editing mistakes. So, instead of making false and patronising comments on my talk page, I suggest that you try becoming a knowledgeable editor yourself and stop making invalid changes which not only don't improve articles but also waste the time of other editors who correct them. It is obvious from your own talk page that you have an aggressive attitude towards editors who try to advise you about your incorrect editing. You need to stop this. Afterwriting (talk) 00:24, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, talk about patronizing and aggressive.

My indignation this week was from the frustration of having hours of work undone by people who think they're authorities on written English. That's all. milladrive (talk) 17:28, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is really frustrating is the time spent undoing incorrect editing by people who falsely think they're authorities on written English and then being abused for doing so. Afterwriting (talk) 01:55, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abused. Gimme a break. milladrive (talk) 11:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your behaviour clearly expresses several forms of abuse. So I suggest you give it a break. Afterwriting (talk) 04:24, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What? My behavior has done no such thing. I had an objection, and I voiced it. Didn't call anyone names, didn't use foul language, didn't do anything that could be construed as "abuse". And then I let it go and moved forward. So I suggest you give it a break. milladrive (talk) 01:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]