User talk:Euroflux
m:User Talk:Euroflux
b:User Talk:Euroflux
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
K7L (talk) 16:41, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:13, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
|
Hello! Euroflux,
you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:13, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Sionk (talk) 18:22, 8 October 2012 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
CharlieEchoTango (contact) 02:01, 11 October 2012 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Guillaume2303 (talk) 11:21, 21 October 2012 (UTC)October 2012
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Salvio Let's talk about it! 23:50, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Euroflux (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My activity on en:Wikipedia mainly consists in writing articles in my sandbox where there is no battleground at all. Those articles are biographies of notable French engineers and chief executives (living) and professional descriptions of the French engineering system. I feel - rightly or wrongly - that I am a little bit knowledgeable in this field. I have made use of the AFC reviewing process which shows no special battleground mentality.
5 of my articles have been accepted, one of them already nominated for some criteria for level B. As you can see 21 articles are in my sandbox "to be improved", either rejected by the AFC process, or not yet ready to be put in the AFC reviewing process. In another subpage of my sand box I am categorizing French engineers by Corps, by school and by specialty.
Please have a look ; this is a huge piece of work, all the more since I am doing this in parallel for the French, German, Russian, Swedish Wikipedias. My account Euroflux is exclusively dedicated to Aerospace engineering and Economics of innovation ; this is a "professional" account. As a human person, I have many other fields of interest, languages, anthropology, ethnonoly, religion, freediving, but I forbid myself to edit in those other fields in order to avoid confusion. I discovered only very recently the potentiality of the "sandbox" and as you can see I am now mainly active in my sandbox and its subpages. By definition and by construction there may be no conflict in my sandboxes since I am the only user, if I understood right the Wikipedia rules. As you can see, I created other subpages of my sandbox for aeronautics industry and for economics of innovation, all of those sandbox subpages being built in parallel for at least the English, French, German, Russian, Swedish Wikipedia.
I had been asked last August on the German Wikipedia to make a global presentation of my categorizing trees but I had been unable to do this at that time partly due to the language and due to the fact as well that I did not master at that time the “sandbox”. As a result, the (= Category:Aerospace engineers), existing in 25 different Wikis…) had been removed. Amazingly enough, this category had been assessed appropriate, but it had to be removed because there had not been a prior consensus obtained before. The (= Category:Space agencies), had been removed as well ; the argument that this category exists in 45 different wikis had not been considered sufficient. Germans consider that it is irrelevant whether the category is correct or not. They focus on the process ; the (= Category:Space agencies) should have been decided with consensus.
My working in my sandboxes is therefore an excellent way to avoid any kind of conflict. I am working very fast and this speed frightens people a little bit. If I work directly on the categorizing tree, it is too quick for people to understand. On the 30th of July I was blocked on the French Wikipedia because some people thought that I was making a wrong tree. They were no category “specialists”. After my blocking, a “category” specialist examined my categories and he stated that 95% was correct ; the only removed categories were “Ingénieur aéronautique français vivant” (living) and “Ingénieur aéronautique français décédé” (deceased).
I recently broke my own rule of "only aeronautics and economics of innovation". I wrote the biography of Alain Bugat, a former boss of mine. He had undergone the reviewing process and had been accepted. The banner “Autobiography” was added on his page, which was rather insulting for me. I felt insulted and this made me think immediately of the biography of Florence Devouard. If you have a look at the , and if you can read French, the autobiographical character is pretty obvious. It took me 30 seconds to add the banner "Autobiography" on FD's page and it was over ! I went back to my work. I would never had put the banner "Autobiography" on Florence Devouard's page if this banner had not been put previously on Alain Bugat's biography !
The problem is that the banner "Autobiography" was removed in a rough, almost threatening way... Guillaume2303 called this a "personal attack" against Florence Devouard, which forced me to justify the banner... I would never have written these long justifications if I had not been requested to ! I just made the remark that this shows a double standard policy on Wikipedia... Tougher rules regarding "notability" are applied to people outside Wikipedia than to insiders.
This was an obvious big mistake of mine to add the "Autobiography" banner on FD's bio. It was an obviously sensitive issue, almost a “blasphemy”, and it is none of my business.
Again I 99% work in my sandbox on my articles, and on my categorizing trees for French engineers, Aeronautics industry, and Economics of innovation.
My newly acquired working method allows me to work very fast and in a peaceful context since on my sandbox, I am not obliged to justify every step of this long lasting work. My work is done in a meta-wiki perspective.
I really have no objection to every Wikimedia employee having their biography on Wikipedia ; again, my adding the “Autobiography” banner was nothing but a reaction to Alain Bugat receiving this banner. And my long justifications were done on request.
I request to get the possibility to continue my long lasting work in my sandboxes. The value of this work has already been at least partially demonstrated. Euroflux (talk) 15:03, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
After reading this discussion about you on AN/I and seeing your behavior in this CfD there is absolutely nothing in your request above that leads me to believe that you will behave yourself from now on. — Hex (❝?!❞) 09:45, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Category:Sociology of innovation
[edit]Category:Sociology of innovation, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 03:30, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marwan Lahoud, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:24, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AeroSpace and Defence Industries Association of Europe concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AeroSpace and Defence Industries Association of Europe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:00, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yves Sillard, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:25, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election
[edit]Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 16:41, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marwan Lahoud
[edit]
Hello Euroflux. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Marwan Lahoud".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marwan Lahoud}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:03, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
da:Brugerdiskussion:Euroflux de:Kategorie:Raumfahrtagentur es:Usuario discusión:Euroflux fr:Discussion:Florence Devouard ko:사용자토론:Euroflux ja:利用者‐会話:Euroflux ru:Обсуждение участника:Euroflux sv:Användardiskussion:Euroflux
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yves Sillard, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:54, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Draft:Yves Sillard concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Yves Sillard, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:04, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Yves Sillard has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
DGG ( talk ) 00:54, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bundesamt für Wehrtechnik und Beschaffung, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bundesverband der Deutschen Luft- und Raumfahrtindustrie, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Conseil général de l'armement concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Conseil général de l'armement, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Frédéric van Roekeghem concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Frédéric van Roekeghem, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Yannick d'Escatha concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Yannick d'Escatha, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Bundesamt für Wehrtechnik und Beschaffung
[edit]Hello, Euroflux. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Bundesamt für Wehrtechnik und Beschaffung".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 13:40, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Bundesverband der Deutschen Luft- und Raumfahrtindustrie
[edit]Hello, Euroflux. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Bundesverband der Deutschen Luft- und Raumfahrtindustrie".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 13:40, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Yannick d'Escatha
[edit]Hello, Euroflux. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Yannick d'Escatha".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 10:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Conseil général de l'armement
[edit]Hello, Euroflux. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Conseil général de l'armement".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 15:09, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
[edit]Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 06:02, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Euroflux/École supérieure des techniques aéronautiques et de construction automobile
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User:Euroflux/École supérieure des techniques aéronautiques et de construction automobile, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:29, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Category:Aerospace agencies has been nominated for deletion
[edit]
Category:Aerospace agencies has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 17:20, 15 October 2020 (UTC)