User talk:Hole in the wall

Hole in the wall's talk page. (Please leave a message) Current talk page Archives Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Re: UmugaOwnsAll! What a prick Another admin has already blocked this user. If you ever see that image again, please don't hesitate to post the offending account at WP:AIV. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 03:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC) Metal Hammer review for Fear of a Blank Planet Hey, I was wondering if you could provide a link or citation for the review you added. I don't mean to say that I doubt you, but the review is liable to get removed if it doesn't have proper documentation that it actually exists. I tried looking on their website myself and couldn't find it. See WP:ALBUM#Professional_reviews for more details. Thanks! Kerrow 13:23, 17 July 2007 (UTC) You wrote The review is in the Metal Hammer magazine. It's not on the internet, but on paper. Hole in the wall 16:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC) I wrote If you still have the magazine you should have no trouble writing up a citation to be included in the references section. Kerrow 01:42, 18 July 2007 (UTC) {{subst:User:Android Mouse Bot 2/reason-warn|Sancity's First Demo|housekeeping (CSD G6) --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:59, 21 July 2007 (UTC) {{subst:User:Android Mouse Bot 2/reason-warn|Sanctity's Third Demo|housekeeping (CSD G6) --Android Mouse Bot 2 06:00, 21 July 2007 (UTC) Yo, From EndlessWires Aye, your welcome. I was bored so I thought I'd do that for you, I'll crack on with that other one you told me about some time tomorrow. Downloading Genesis tracks at the mo. How's it goin' on holiday? Havin' a fun time? Image source problem with Image:Blacklogo.jpg Image Copyright problem This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Blacklogo.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (Image:Greater Art.jpg) Thanks for uploading Image:Greater Art.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:22, 13 September 2007 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (Image:The Neonai.gif) Thanks for uploading Image:The Neonai.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (Image:Headstones (album).jpg) Thanks for uploading Image:Headstones (album).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:53, 13 September 2007 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (Image:Forever Autumn (album).jpg) Thanks for uploading Image:Forever Autumn (album).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cover acc.jpg) Thanks for uploading Image:Cover acc.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:34, 13 September 2007 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (Image:Black Brick Road.jpg) Thanks for uploading Image:Black Brick Road.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:54, 13 September 2007 (UTC) HEY! I love your name. I love any Gaelic/Scottish name. They're all wonderful. Love your userpage, too!!! P.S. Do you like Albannach? -Éowyn Alestrii 18:29, 14 September 2007 (UTC) sorry here is my email........ murtagh.eldest@hotmail.com anyways, thank you!!!!!!!!!1 --Éowyn Alestrii 15:33, 15 September 2007 (UTC) Anyways Be sure to leave your name and wikiuser name when you email me. So I can recognize you. Thank you! --Éowyn Alestrii 15:32, 15 September 2007 (UTC) Yo Hey man, I'm a bit bored at college at the mo. MySpace got blocked, so has YouTube. :( Just thought I message you on Wiki, I really do have nothing to do. I finished this really long essay on Market Research. A tad boring, but I chose to be on this course so I guess I can't complain. How's your college doing by the way, anythin' interestin' happenin'....sorry man, you'll come on here and see all this rubbish that I typed but I'm basically boreeeed. Oh, I met someone who said she recognised me from somewhere. Turns out she recognised me from Doveland, she was in the year above us. She remembers me, I didn't remember her I only remember her name, I told her about you, and she says she remembers you to, she also told me that someone in Yr. 11 at Desford actually facies you. I think she said her name was Laurie or Lauren or something like that. I said "that'll make interesting conversation." I'll talk to you later on MSN though, so I'll hopefully talk to you tonight sometime. Anyways, see you dude! EndlessWires —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.219.190.4 (talk) 11:42, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Lake of Tears pictures Thank you for your interest and effort in keeping the wikipedia pages clean. I'd like to turn your attention to the picture of LoT on their main page, tagged as inappropriate because another free image may be found freely on the web, which is not exactly correct. All the promotional photos on the LoT site may be used freely within wikipedia (and only here), as the webmaster replied to me when I asked him (via the contact form in the contact section) about this issue. Most of the other photos of LoT found on the web which are not on their official site are photos from concerts, which indeed are not suitable exactly because I could, myself, post pictures of my own after attending a concert. My point is that the picture should stay, it is a promotional one (poster, as the license tag is correct) and the webmaster allows it to be used here. Costinbanu 07:06, 24 October 2007 (UTC) For the record.. I'll leave a signing if I choose. Bug off. oi alasdhaire how is ur forehead, people keep deleting my contributions what is that all about? arrgh people keep deleting my contributions, what is that all about? Willfordy (talk) 20:48, 7 January 2008 (UTC) yo alasdhaigfrynweer, mate will you send joeyjoeyjojo that tutorial that you sent me? cheers buddy xx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Willfordy (talk • contribs) 14:11, 18 January 2008 (UTC) Animosity EP A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Animosity EP, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Animosity EP. Dchall1 (talk) 01:05, 22 January 2008 (UTC) Broken (The Berzerker EP) A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Broken (The Berzerker EP), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Broken (The Berzerker EP). Dchall1 (talk) 01:06, 22 January 2008 (UTC) Inextricable Zenith A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Inextricable Zenith, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Inextricable Zenith. Dchall1 (talk) 01:06, 22 January 2008 (UTC) Full of Hate A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Full of Hate, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Full of Hate. Dchall1 (talk) 01:07, 22 January 2008 (UTC) send joeyjoeyjojo that welcome thing that you sent me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Willfordy (talk • contribs) 16:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC) Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Albanach.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Albanach.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC) Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Static-X DVD.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Static-X DVD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:26, 18 February 2008 (UTC) Demo '98 A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Demo '98, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? B. Wolterding (talk) 14:58, 28 April 2008 (UTC) Speedy deletion of Image:Kristian Ranta.jpg A tag has been placed on Image:Kristian Ranta.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Kristian Ranta.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 21:28, 29 April 2008 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Trading Pieces A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Trading Pieces, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Vianello (talk) 05:49, 16 June 2008 (UTC) I removed the rest of these, since it's all pretty much the same darn thing for the same darn reason. Only one album wasn't marked in this fashion. No need to spam your talk page unduly. Proposed deletion of …Beyond Recognition A proposed deletion template has been added to the article …Beyond Recognition, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mdsummermsw (talk) 16:29, 30 July 2008 (UTC) AfD nomination of Promo 1999 I have nominated Promo 1999, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promo 1999. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Undead Warrior (talk) 19:46, 5 January 2009 (UTC) TfD nomination of Template:Albannach Template:Albannach has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 11:10, 23 April 2009 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Sanctity Template:Sanctity has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Cannibaloki 20:29, 1 December 2009 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Filth Catalyst The article Filth Catalyst has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links: Filth Catalyst – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability. While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Darkwind (talk) 02:13, 26 March 2010 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Aes Dana Template:Aes Dana has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:32, 14 July 2011 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Chroniques du Crépuscule The article Chroniques du Crépuscule has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Self-released demos are assumed non-notable per WP:MUSIC While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:33, 14 July 2011 (UTC) New Page Patrol survey New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Hole in the wall! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey Nomination for deletion of Template:Black Books Template:Black Books has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. – hysteria18 (talk) 22:40, 7 April 2012 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Battered Template:Battered has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:48, 2 November 2012 (UTC) Nomination of Nachthymnen (From the Twilight Kingdom) for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nachthymnen (From the Twilight Kingdom) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nachthymnen (From the Twilight Kingdom) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 20:57, 16 January 2013 (UTC) Nomination of Satanized for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Satanized is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satanized until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 09:35, 17 January 2013 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Soldiers (Drowning Pool song) The article Soldiers (Drowning Pool song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 18:33, 30 April 2015 (UTC) Quixotic plea You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 06:27, 23 May 2015 (UTC) ArbCom elections are now open! Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC) New deal for page patrollers Hi Hole in the wall, In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created. Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work. Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Urban War faction Template:Urban War faction has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC) Nomination of As Blood Flows for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article As Blood Flows is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/As Blood Flows until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:42, 21 February 2019 (UTC) Nomination of World Abomination for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Abomination is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Abomination until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:43, 21 February 2019 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Troy Template:Troy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. TheImaCow (talk) 09:10, 30 June 2020 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Where the Hell Are We and What Day Is It... This Is Static-X Hello, Hole in the wall. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Where the Hell Are We and What Day Is It... This Is Static-X". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code. If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:57, 20 November 2020 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Deathbound Template:Deathbound has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Lennart97 (talk) 20:15, 18 March 2021 (UTC) Nomination of Driven Under for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Driven Under is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Driven Under until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – DarkGlow • 19:31, 17 August 2021 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Vargaresa Cover.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Vargaresa Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 3 June 2023 (UTC)