User talk:Irbox

Irbox, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Irbox! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Doctree (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hamid Nematollah

added a link pointing to Director

Mohsen Tanabandeh

added a link pointing to Director

Shahab Hosseini

added a link pointing to San Sebastian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi. It's Done Irbox (talk) 22:59, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Hello, I'm Creeperparty568. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Jamshid Hashempur without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Creeperparty568 ~ Cool Guy (talk) 22:55, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello Creeperparty568 please Help for Match up Jamshid Hashempour with other wiki language is:Jamshid Hashempour and fa:جمشید هاشم‌پور. Irbox (talk) 22:58, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello Irbox. It seems that you are trying to deal with a problem related to another language wikipedia. Please do not edit the english wikipedia with spellings from different languages. Please use your respective wikipedia. View the wikis at wikipedia.org. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Creeperparty568 (talk • contribs) 23:03, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

I'm want the page to be linked other wiki, is:Jamshid Hashempour and fa:جمشید هاشم‌پور. Irbox (talk) 23:06, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Ghermez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghermez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghermez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I'm been doing} 00:30, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fish may fall in love movie.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fish may fall in love movie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:59, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Irbox, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ⁓ Hello71 12:28, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

لطفا از این ترجمه به زبان شما

(please translate this to your language) I've come to the conclusion that you probably don't know English or at least not much of it. But the solution can't be that you copy texts from all over the internet. As long you are not fluid in English you should stick to data and tables and leave the texts to other people. Things like this ([1]), meaning finding a sentence somewhere and simply copying it to Wikipedia, are not correct, even if you give a source. --92.73.28.106 (talk) 21:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Your addition to As Simple as That (film) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 00:08, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

i'm no understand your mind. its not copy, is orginal text and translate me. I should distort the text?. It's funny. Irbox (talk) 08:43, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content into the article As Simple as That (film). Everything you add MUST be verified with reliable sources. The burden is with you to provide them. If you continue to add unsourced information into articles, this will be viewed as disruption and you'll face being blocked from editing. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 08:44, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Your Please stop funny work. i'm creat new awards for movies? yeah?!! im no understand your mind. Do not threaten mr Lugnuts. Your behavior is greatly nasty. Irbox (talk) 08:49, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Again, you add no sources to the articles you're editing. Please read WP:RS. And see WP:CIR too. The next unsourced addition could result in you being blocked. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 08:57, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Sir Again for you. Do not threaten. listen to me. i'm not film festival, i'm wikipedia user. he is orginaly award for movie I don't think I can manipulate. understand?1 Irbox (talk) 09:00, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

I'm not threatening you - I'm pointing out the WP polcies that you MUST abide by. Also please read WP:RS/IMDB - you can't use IMDB as a source. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 12:38, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

House of Cinema

added a link pointing to Cinema

The Salesman (2016 film)

added a link pointing to Variety

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

It's Done Irbox (talk) 11:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Ghermez. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:56, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Your recent editing history at As Simple as That (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dl2000 (talk) 22:28, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

It is an insult and slander. Your support saboteurs Irbox (talk) 00:29, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Your addition to Bist (film) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you continue to copy & paste vast amounts of text from other websites into WP articles, you will be blocked from editing. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 08:49, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Katie^talk 17:41, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Irbox (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This is a great insult and abuse, Wikipedia dont personal house lugnutsIrbox (talk) 02:02, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have been warned multiple times for violating Wikipedia's copyright violations, and your unblock request is not convincing to me. It doesn't show that you will stop, nor does it show that you understand at all. Therefore your unblock requests is denied. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:11, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fereydoun Jeyrani

added a link pointing to Executive

Iran Cinema Celebration

added a link pointing to Persian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing to add copyright violations and unsourced text after your previous block for the same thing. Please read WP:COPYVIO and WP:VERIFY. You may be unblocked if you clearly indicate that you understand Wikipedia's policies on copyright and will abide by them in the future. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Black Kite (talk) 08:29, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Irbox (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My work Translate from the site SourehCinema and Farabi. My work not copy. My work Translate the from site SourehCinema and Farabi. My work not copy. My work Translate from the site SourehCinema and Farabi. My work not copy. NO C O P Y . UNDERSTAND??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????/ Shame work by PamD - Lugnuts - Black Kite - DMacks your source me copy work?? Admin unfair!!!!!

Decline reason:

If you are simply translating from another site, that would be a copyright violation. If that's what you mean, the block is appropriate. If you mean something else, please specify. Yamla (talk) 12:20, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Tell me

For example, Please Give me English links Awards Hashempour and [2]. My work not copy. Translated from Persian Language. Your job is bullying Mundi, Lugnuts, Black Kite, User:DMacks.

• If you are translating from a copyrighted source, as you appear to be doing (Soureh Cinema, for example, is copyrighted), then that is still copyrighted. Black Kite (talk) 12:28, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

• Soureh Cinema no copyrighted. im Translation from Persian to English language. but not straight copy, i translated and edited. You say this is not legal!. Irbox (talk) 14:07, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fish may fall in love movie.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fish may fall in love movie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Unknown

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Irbox (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I once explained. My work do not copy. It is legal

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but you will need to explain yourself in a lot more detail than that. If you do not have sufficient command of English to hold a discussion here, then the chances of your being able to continue editing the English language Wikipedia are slim. Have you considered sticking to the Wikipedia in your native language? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:39, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please review Appealing a block - Mlpearc (open channel) 14:14, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Houseofcinema.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Houseofcinema.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Investigation

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Irbox (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Investigation with justice and No insulting and illusion- My work Legal No copy. For the thousandth time!!!!!

Decline reason:

I understand that you are frustrated and upset over your account being blocked. I hope you understand that we are not here to make your life harder or keep you away from the project. We are here to build an encyclopedia and keep it protected from edits and content additions that would put the encyclopedia's integrity and underlying principles at risk. Looking at your unblock request reasons (including this one) it doesn't appear that you have taken the feedback and responses from other administrators to mind. You have not only failed to demonstrate an understanding of the violation that you repeatedly engaged in, but you have also failed to demonstrate that your intentions and your priorities are in-line with building an encyclopedia. Because of this, I am declining your request to have your account unblocked. Please read and understand Wikipedia:Copyrights as well as Wikipedia:Five pillars and come back when you are confident that you can make a genuine and well-mannered unblock request. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:03, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Irbox. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dokhtarmovie.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dokhtarmovie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Doraneasheghi.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Doraneasheghi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mohakemedarkhiaban.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mohakemedarkhiaban.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:06, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Iran Cinema Celebration

The article Iran Cinema Celebration has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No real indication of notability, virtually all the reliable sources are related to it, among other cinema groups, shutting down during covid.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 03:23, 15 February 2023 (UTC)