User talk:Krishna's flute

Welcome!

Hello, Krishna's flute, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Harshil ^{want to talk?} 02:41, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Morari Bapu: Assume Good Faith

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on Morari Bapu. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Moksha88 (talk) 02:53, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You can avoid this notice. This is reductant. — Harshil ^{want to talk?} 05:19, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Swaminarayan Sampraday: Belittling Editors

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you.

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Please have a look at NPOVN#Morari Bapu. -Nizil (talk) 06:17, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic Edit

I looked at this edit and I want to tell you that this is problematic. Swati is unknown and not notable figure outside Wikipedia and we generally don’t include names of accused in article per WP:BLPCRIME policy. Also, note that article you quoted is funny and includes opinion of one anonymous not notable twitter handle. Her alleged fake news peddling and fake reports have nothing to do with her company and their reception. I’ll request you that you’ll self-revert your edit and follow steps of WP:BRD. You’re already contributing in India, Pakistan and Afghanistan (IPA) are which is highly controversial on Wikipedia and has Discretionary Sanctions power to any uninvolved admin. WP:TBAN on you will be bad decision but it can be if you’ll do WP:TE. — Harshil ^{want to talk?} 07:04, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of A New Idea of India

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on A New Idea of India, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Limited Idea4me (talk) 10:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A New Idea of India moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, A New Idea of India, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Aloolkaparatha (talk) 14:28, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shuttler Flick.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shuttler Flick.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:55, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Whose Samosa Is It Anyway

Hello, Krishna's flute. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Whose Samosa Is It Anyway, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Whose Samosa Is It Anyway

Hello, Krishna's flute. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Whose Samosa Is It Anyway".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of GAP Associates

The article GAP Associates has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability is WP:INHERITED from the Dholera Special Investment Region project

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:17, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of GAP Associates for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GAP Associates is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GAP Associates until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:39, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]