Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1574 Meyer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Davewild (talk) 07:26, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

1574 Meyer

1574 Meyer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (preferably) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 06:11, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:27, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

• Unsure. Observed in an occultation event [1] and mentioned briefly in several papers about resonances and about the spectral properties of Cybele and D-type asteroids. Is it enough? —David Eppstein (talk) 06:38, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:22, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

• Keep: OMB@59km and thus somewhat more notable than a common MBA<50km. -- Kheider (talk) 14:51, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:39, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.