Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aek Chabhi Hai Padoss Mein
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:30, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
- Aek Chabhi Hai Padoss Mein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced article that fails to credibly assert notability of the subject. The only valid link in this article is an archived link from 2007 from the TV station's website. A Google search identified some links from directory listings and a couple of links that may be LINKVIOs. I couldn't really find anything to establish notability. AussieLegend (✉) 11:41, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:36, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:36, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 03:00, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 03:00, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SophisticatedSwampert let's talk about that 01:30, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SophisticatedSwampert let's talk about that 01:30, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - It seems that article could be broadened using Hindi news sources but it wasn't done just like most of other Hindi TV shows articles. D4iNa4 (talk) 15:54, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - I can't find any sourcing for it, so in its current state it doesn't pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 21:52, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.