Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhil Bharatiya Poorva Sainik Seva Parishad
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:06, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Akhil Bharatiya Poorva Sainik Seva Parishad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article was speedily deleted under CSD:A7 on 25 October 2021 by User:Materialscientist. At Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2021 October 26, this deletion was overturned and the decision referred to AFD. I am completing this listing as a procedural measure and express no opinion on the article. Stifle (talk) 09:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:22, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:22, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Due to the lack of detailed coverage article fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH.Venkat TL (talk) 18:34, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: As I mentioned in the DRV discussion, the organization is pretty run-of-the-mill; and my BEFORE search turned up no significant sources and largely mentions in a few sources. Not much in GBooks either. JavaHurricane 04:42, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Failed WP:CORPDEPTH. Behind the moors (talk) 11:32, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.