Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Basar International Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 00:48, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Al Basar International Foundation

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Al Basar International Foundation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No substantive coverage in Reliable Sources. Nothing to indicate notability. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 00:04, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

• 'Source Searching - Google web search provides no reliable 3rd party secondary sources. Google news search provides the following:

• [1] Arab News: Needy families in Mauritania and Nigeria benefit from KSrelief surgery projects - mentions Al Basar International Foundation providing surgeries.
• [2] Saudi Gazette: Dr. Al Rabeeah meets with UNHCR regional representative to GCC States - Exact same text as above, probably just copying a press release or it's a paid article.
• [3] International Centre for Investigative Reporting: An investigative piece talking about how Al Basar International Foundation is being asked to STOP helping with a program because of fraud allegations.
• [4] Vanguard: Talks about providing surgeries, different wording than previous articles suggesting not just a press release.

These were just the 1st 4 news articles that I checked, seems to be more. I was all set to !vote delete after doing the simple web googling, but now I actually think these sources support marginal notability. So instead I'm going to vote Keep. Fieari (talk) 04:43, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

• Keep. I added some references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:06, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:34, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:34, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:34, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

• Keep passes WP:GNG.[5][6][7]Brayan ocaner (talk) 16:06, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.