Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All-Star Miracle Home

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Children's Miracle Network Hospitals but if consensus eventually lands on Children's Miracle Network, that would also be a fine target. That is an editorial decision. Star Mississippi 02:11, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

All-Star Miracle Home

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

All-Star Miracle Home (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Total spam. Would G11, but it's somehow survived for several years like this. The fundamental purpose of this page seems to be to promote a lottery, and it would need to be rewritten entirely to do anything else. Notability is also somewhat unclear based on the BEFORE search. I also suspect it to be a copyright violation, but I wasn't able to identify where it came from. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 22:25, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 22:25, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:41, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
• Redirect to the Children's Miracle Network, which seems to be the charity that benefits from this and now promotes it. Nate • (chatter) 22:47, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
• Agree – You should feel free to conduct a WP:BLAR (to Children's Miracle Network Hospitals) which would solve the problem and avoid continued, needless discussion. – S. Rich (talk) 23:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
• Delete A redirect would WP:ASTONISH since this program is not mentioned there and a reader would have no idea why they were taken there. This article was written in 2006, and I found a 2007 article, but nothing newer. I don't see enough to meet GNG even if rewritten. MB 00:10, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.