Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aware Girls

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)‎ Wikibear47 (talk) 06:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Aware Girls

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Aware Girls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability issue. WP:GNG Wikibear47 (talk) 04:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Wikibear47 (talk) 04:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
• Comment Can you elaborate on the notability concerns? On a quick glance, there are a lot of cites from major publications. The founder has her own article, no doubt at least partly on the strength of having founded this organization. If there's a notability issue I'm not seeing it but perhaps you had something specific in mind. Oblivy (talk) 05:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
  • I suppose @Wikibear47: should edit all of their AFDs and provide more detailed explanations so that we can better analyze them. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 05:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

    The only reason for AFD is because this one looks like WP:PROMOTION to me. Does it really deserve its own article? Just my thought. Wikibear47 (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

• "Notability issue. WP:GNG" is not a sufficient reason to offer for an article's deletion. It also doesn't demonstrate that you followed procedures and did a WP:BEFORE before deciding to nominate this article. You have to show your work. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:14, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep If the language is promotional, it can be fixed but WP:NOTCLEANUP says that such issues shouldn't be raised here.
  Since nobody has voted to delete, you can still withdraw the nomination. Once you're up to speed on how these things work, and if at that point you genuinely believe there's a notability issue, you could bring the AfD again. Oblivy (talk) 06:16, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

• And what is worse is that you cut and pasted this same deletion rationale for all of your deletion nominations! This is not acceptable. I'm going to consider doing a procedural close on these AFDs because it's apparent you didn't put much thought into these nominations, Wikibear47. I would encourage you to withdrawn these nominations. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Pakistan. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.