Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernhoff Dahl
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 09:14, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Bernhoff Dahl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article does not prove the notability of its subject, and it contains extensive original research. Aliciakeyzz (talk) 19:57, 24 November 2009 (UTC) — Aliciakeyzz (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Delete. Self promo. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 23:26, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:31, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I read the articles, and none of them are reputable secondary sources about the man himself. The one from the Bangor Daily News is a total fluff piece promoting his book. 209.2.225.138 (talk) 19:19, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.