Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data Palette (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 01:39, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Data Palette (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am not seeing how this passes WP:PRODUCT and Wikipedia:Notability (software). One inline ref is not accessible without subscription; the other is from Network World, which itself seems like a publication of dubious notability. A review in two or three niche websites is not enough to make software notable. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:22, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete same observations. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 19:29, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Advertisement. Gamaliel (talk) 23:27, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.