Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diono (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:16, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Diono

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Diono
• Articles for deletion/Diono (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Diono (3rd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Diono (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. I looked at all the references in the article. They are links to the company's own website, reprints of press releases, routine coverage of funding and other business announcements, and reviews of some of the company's products. Nothing that talks about the company itself.

My own searching failed to turn up anything better. Searching for the company name brings up a large number of hits, but they're mostly just mentions of the company name on web sites that sell or review their products. I found some announcements of product recalls; I don't hold that against them, but it's not something that supports WP:N. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:06, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Hmmm, I see there was a previous AfD on this, which I had some minor involvement in (relisted), and long since forgotten about. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:23, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:23, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

• Delete All the sources I can find are reviews of one of their products. I'm not sure that the reviews are in reliable sources. Either way, notability is not inherited. Rockphed (talk) 12:28, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
• Delete. Sources are limited to mentions in passing, local press and product reviews, nothing to suggest the company is significant and warrants an encyclopedic entry. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:16, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.