Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 747
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:24, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Gliese 747 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO. StringTheory11 (t • c) 03:02, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per a SIMBAD lookup, this system only seems to be a data point in more general studies. No suitable references found. Praemonitus (talk) 16:23, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:20, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:54, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 05:47, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge however I do not know which article to merge this to. Perhaps there could be an article on binary m type stars. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:12, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or possibly merge to List of stars in Lyra per WP:NASTRO. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:06, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.