Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HB Construction
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn per WP:HEY, Ceyockey's work has assuaged my concerns about notability. The article as it currently is isn't perfect, but such concerns aren't dealt with via AfD. (non-admin closure) – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 03:43, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- HB Construction (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't think this business passes the general notability guideline. None of the links given inline mention the company at all (that they're not in the right format has no bearing on this AfD, IMO), and a Google Search returns nothing but such sites as LinkedIn, Newswire, etc., none of which establish notability. This could possibly fall under G11, but I wanted to play it safe and bring it here. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 00:49, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 00:49, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 00:49, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- Comment—I have done some work on the article, not enough, but there is an indication that there might be sufficient coverage to allow it to survive AfD. One problem, not an excuse, is that private firms are always less reported on than public firms. Link to the Diff between the state at time of nomination and the last edit I've done before coming here → https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HB_Construction&type=revision&diff=913932925&oldid=913915978&diffmode=source . --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:34, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.