Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jw (Counter-Strike player)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:44, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- Jw (Counter-Strike player) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unfortinately for video game players, they are not covered by a dedicated subguideline like WP:SPORTSBIO so they have to meet the same WP:GNG as lesser, non-regular sport mortals. I don't see what makes is individual notable. He seems moderately successful, but - so what? Coverage of his career seems limited to niche portals/trade journals on video games. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 17:12, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:38, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:38, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I'm quite familiar with the ESL and I have heard of this guy but Godsent isn't really a major team and none of their players have articles except for this one. He played with Fnatic for 3 years with Olofmeister but was really a background player (I think he was the reserve in fact). Therefor I can't see how he is notable. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 18:58, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- Neither of these claims aree true, he was a full member of fnatic for all three years, and the team won a record number of majors those years.--Prisencolin (talk) 17:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- @AlessandroTiandelli333: Flusha has an article that looks even worse then this. Should we AfD it as well? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:12, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- Yes please, User:Piotrus. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 21:18, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- Typically better to redirect the player articles to the team articles, if they're mentioned there in detail czar 18:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
- Yes please, User:Piotrus. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 21:18, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete both - neither have the third party coverage to meet the GNG. Sergecross73 msg me 19:18, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete ESPN, Yahoo, Daily Dot, Aftonbladet etc don't amount to significant coverage.--Prisencolin (talk) 16:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.