Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karol Bedorf (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 04:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Karol Bedorf

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Karol Bedorf
• Articles for deletion/Karol Bedorf (2nd nomination)

Karol Bedorf (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As per WP:MMANOT and only one source. SQGibbon (talk) 23:02, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:18, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:18, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:18, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

• Delete It is all a list of stats without anything in the way of a comprehensive biographical sketch.TH1980 (talk) 00:32, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
• Delete per reasons listed by Papaursa in the previous deletion discussion regarding this article. I don't know what state the article was in when it was deleted in 2014, but I don't see anything that suggests that the article is more notable now than it was then. Neil916 (Talk) 09:35, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
• Delete This should have been a simple DB-repost.Peter Rehse (talk) 10:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
• Should also consider Mateusz Gamrot and Borys Mańkowski for the same reasons (same time and author) although these ones were not previously deleted.Peter Rehse (talk) 10:37, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

I agree that those two do not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NMMA, but it may be a bit late to include them in this discussion. Papaursa (talk) 01:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

• Delete No top tier fights shows that WP:NMMA is not met. In addition, routine sports reporting is insufficient to meet WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 01:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
• Delete Per above arguments, failing NMMA, sketchy on GNG, and bad article. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 02:43, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.