Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liquid V (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:26, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Liquid V (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not convinced this meets WP:NCORP; its parent label, V Recordings, was WP:A7d by RHaworth in 2015. Launchballer 19:47, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:48, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:48, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:48, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. In the fourteen years this article has been here nobody has managed to add evidence of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 02:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Search for reliable sources was futile. Non-notable as a corporation, non-notable as a record label. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 13:55, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.