Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of songs
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (Non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 06:37, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Lists of songs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This just seems to copy and organize the contents of Category:Lists of songs and its subcategories, which makes this list subject to continual maintenance and being out of date, while the categorization method should be more complete and easier to navigate. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:35, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:CLN/WP:NOTDUP. Lugnuts Precious bodily fluids 18:06, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Don't see how this is beneficial since it does not include any features that aren't already available within the existing category scheme (per WP:NOTDUP). Would a list of discographies that just copies the entire contents of Category:Discographies be beneficial? --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:15, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep – Qualifies for an article per WP:NOTDUP relative to Category:Lists of songs. Also qualifies as a functional navigational aid per WP:LISTPURP, and also as an easier means for users to access song list articles compared to having to having to click through all of the subcategories on the category page. WP:LISTPURP being met is evidenced in part per the 28,867 page views the article has received in the last 90 days. Deletion would simply make this content more difficult for users to access. North America1000 02:56, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:22, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.