Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louisa Connolly-Burnham

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:39, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Louisa Connolly-Burnham

Louisa Connolly-Burnham (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actress, Found nothing to indicate notability, Fails WP:GNG. -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 16:50, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 11:06, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

• Delete Not notable yet. Give her time. LucyLucyLucyLucy1 (talk) 21:13, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:31, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

---

• Delete Unable to find sources which would establish notability under GNG. Currently only sourced to an unreliable database. --j⚛e decker^talk 23:23, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.