Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mika Nagano
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 02:36, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Mika Nagano (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
MMA fighter with no top tier fights so fails WP:NMMA. I don't read Japanese, but the coverage looks routine.Mdtemp (talk) 17:42, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I just opened up a vote on WT:MMANOT to make Jewels a top-tier WMMA organization. I would suggest delaying any related deletions until that discussion has had time to develop. Luchuslu (talk) 15:26, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Based on the discussion at WT:MMANOT and the new criteria it generated, I wish to withdraw my nomination of this article.Mdtemp (talk) 14:23, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:27, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:27, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:27, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:27, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 21:53, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep Subject appears to meet new criteria and the nominator has asked to withdraw his AfD nomination. Papaursa (talk) 18:26, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.