Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New York Model Management
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 08:44, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- New York Model Management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability nor any independent reliable source in the article as it stands. Yes, I've just slimmed it down by reverting a number of COI edits by paid editor Trident13 (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#LA Models), but there weren't any independent sources before that either. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:14, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - No notability or verifiable source is seen. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 09:21, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - No in-depth coverage in independent sources, thus the company is not notable for an article at this time. -- Diannaa (talk) 18:24, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - unsourced, and difficult to source, stub. Bearian (talk) 20:00, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.