Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Origin (Evanescence album)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 01:30, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Origin (Evanescence album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Demos are assumed non-notable per WP:MUSIC; this article only has three refs: one of them non-credible and one of them third-party. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:22, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. SilverserenC 03:41, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have tagged this article for rescue and have put a number of links into the article. SilverserenC 03:41, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per sources in article; significant coverage in reliable independent sources is sufficient to defeat the presumption against demos at WP:MUSIC. Which is good, because this is a particularly excellent demo which I highly recommend. :-) - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:02, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:00, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. Armando.O talk ● Ev ● 3K 01:39, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I forgot to vote. There is significant enough coverage to override the demo rules. SilverserenC 01:54, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as others--Childzy ¤ Talk 18:46, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The sources really just aren't there. Only two articles are actually about the album, the Chowk and the Jambar; the Jambar is a student newspaper and Chowk doesn't seem reliable. So the article lacks notability-indicating sources. A merge is the most appropriate action. ÷seresin 20:12, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- If you really feel you need more sources, try Omnibus Press' book on the band.[1] - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:19, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- We do not need more sources about the band. The band is not what we must prove notability for. ÷seresin 05:10, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The book details the band's origins, including (unsurprisingly) their first album, Origin. - DustFormsWords (talk) 05:40, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: When you sell a few thousand copies of it and sell it at your shows, its not really a "demo" as I think of it.--Milowent (talk) 03:50, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.