Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sekthaus Carl Graeger (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:05, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sekthaus Carl Graeger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Discussed last summer and restored as a contested PROD. However, as was the case then, I do not see CORP level sourcing here, the German article or via a before. While they no longer make their own wine, it's still produced and sourcing should be accessible if it existed Star Mississippi 01:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Wine, Organizations, Companies, and Germany. Star Mississippi 01:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The article, for me lacks significant coverage in current reliable sources. The majority of the references cited are from archival sources or are dated, which raises concerns about the contemporary relevance and notability of the subject. Additionally, there's a limited amount of recent information or ongoing significance to the brand beyond its historical achievements. Also, the quality of old sources is questioned, and seems not to follow the Wikipedia guidelines for reliable sources and verifiability. --Mozzcircuit (talk) 08:35, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete for now. I found a lot of old ads, a brief discussion that is in the references, a patent, but no WP:SIGCOV. This is an old and small company. A combination that can go either way. I'm definitely open to the idea that there is WP:SIGCOV out there. Just couldn't find it. gidonb (talk) 01:40, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.